Why are we okay with every robin hood movie being an interpretation, but all the sudden the oddesy needs to be historically perfect?
Because racism
And because "ewwww trans person."
It's all just so pathetic.
Evidently Lupida isn't beautiful enough to be Helen even as she is one of the prettiest women alive.
I can't wait to see a historically accurate Polyphemus.
It was just a midget with poor eyesight.
Um, the Odyssey is fiction. It literally can't be "historically accurate".
Grok probably told him it's a true story, and he believed it
Elon will run his mouth for a while, then forget about this.
He will never follow through.
nono it will come any day now, just like hyper loop and self driving car
You don't need to make en entire fantasy film to show us that historically accurate cyclops, Elon!
Not enough gay sex, I'm guessing?
Is this because they made Helen of Troy black
Yes
Bring back Troy McClure and his cologne, Smellin of Troy.
You may remember him from such classics like "Lead Paint: Delicious But Deadly".
And he wants to do it all with AI, of course, because he has even less talent and creativity than a rotting dog turd.
I'm going to pray to Jah every night that he follows through on this train wreck of a movie.
The Odyssey is fictional story.
Does he think magic and giants and gods are historically accurate?
What about a historically accurate version of Harry ~~Potter~~ Dresden?
Does he think magic and giants and gods are historically accurate?
Would you put it past him? The guy is so high most of the day he probably thinks the sparkle fairy brings him a coffee every morning.
JK Rowling is a bigoted cunt, and her content doesn't deserve even a sliver of acknowledgement.
I do think it’s still fair to consider the very likely possibility that there’s a fair amount of truth contained within the story though (obviously not all the supernatural stuff, but still). That’s definitely the case with the Iliad; Troy was literally discovered in modern-day Türkiye in the 1800s.
All the crazy stuff in it is probably at least in part a result of its origin as an oral tradition instead of written text. The story being passed down across generations of memorizers without any hard reference to go off of tends to make for a really long game of telephone.
None of this is to humour Musk by the way. I just think this topic is interesting in general.
The theories are that its a mythic retelling of a legend that's an embellished version of something that basically 'kind of' happened, around the time of the Late Bronze Age Collapse, between the 13th and 12th centuries BCE.
The original date of it being first written down is somewhere in the 8th century BCE, so, yeah roughly 500 years of oral tradition untill then.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Is-the-Odyssey-a-True-Story
Schliemann’s findings and the continuing work of later archeologists seriously fueled theories of the historicity of the Trojan War, dated by later Greek authors to the 12th or 13th century bce. While the mere existence of Troy is not proof that the war was real, the discovery of arrowheads, signs of fire, and unburied bodies found in a layer corresponding to the 13th century bce indicates the possibility of battles having occurred.
Supporting evidence includes Hittite records mentioning warfare with Wilusa, their name for Troy. Some historians believe that a kingdom the Hittites called Ahhiyawa was really Achaea, or ancient Greece. Records suggest that sometime in the 13th century, Ahhiyawan forces were involved in a war against Wilusa, whose ruler, Aleksandu (very similar to Alexandros, a name for the Trojan prince Paris), requested military aid from the Hittites. Experts believe that a real conflict or a series of conflicts of some scale—either a struggle for political or commercial supremacy—inspired embellished accounts of the Trojan War.
So... taken in whole... the Odyssey is maybe roughly as actually historically accurate as... the Old Testament.
If your lense is 'is this legitimate history?'...
There are kernels of events that basically actually happened, and some important people who did something vaguely similar to what's described in the stories... around which is erected a grand mythic narrative featuring a great amount of totally fantastic and impossible nonsense, and many wholly fabricated characters and 'plot points'.
Schliemann dug straight through the actual Troy that he was looking for, destroying a huge chunk of it to get to an even earlier settlement in the strata beneath that he decided to call Troy. His "method" was essentially do dig a trench all the way to the bottom, assuming that the oldest level would be Troy. (Yes...he was that stupid).
It was only afterwards that other, actual archaeologists placed the proper stratum that the homeric Troy would have existed in. And by then, much of it was already obliterated.
I majored in Near Eastern Classical Archaeology with a focus on the Bronze age (Hittites, Minoans, Mycenaeans, Babylonians, etc...), and lesson one may as as well have been titled "Why Heinrich Schliemenn was an asshole."
This is extremely true and worth saying as you have.
Yeah, I'm not an subject matter specialist? expert? as you are, but yeah... errybody hates Schliemenn, because his idiotic site practices very likely destroyed a whole lot of ... pretty important history.
I'm far from a specialist. Not only is my knowledge about 25 years or so out of date, I ended up leaving with half a year left on my degree because not only did a divorce make me unable to afford to continue, but some guys from the middle east crashed into the World Trade Center and ignited a war that shut down any actual archaeological work in the most of that part of the world for a decade or so.
So rather than specialist, I'm a guy that has 3.5 years of a 4 year Bachelor's degree, and then went off to take a bunch of computer certificates instead. lol.
Still regret never going back to finish it once the middle east settled down again.
Well... middle east is never settling down again, in our lifetimes, so... best make your peace with it, if you can.
I still appreciate 3.5 years of out of date study.
3.5 more years than me!
New York City is a real place that exists, but that doesn’t make the Avengers films any less fictional.
He couldn't do a worse job tbh. They are wearing pants in that movie, the Greeks thought only effeminate barbarians wore those.
I have a feeling he wouldn't wanna hear about Caeneus
The Lapith Caeneus was originally a young woman named Caenis and the favorite of Poseidon, who changed her into a man at her request, and made Caeneus into an invulnerable warrior
With historically accurate cyclops, scylla, charybdis, sirens and ghost of Agamemnon...
Elon Musk says
ok
This is not oniony, this is just yet another "Elon musk says"
Elon's breath reeks of onion, though
he should buy memphis the water treatment plant he promised so grok can stop using AQUIFER DRINKING WATER for cooling.
fuck elon i hope he gets pancreatic cancer and 4 flat tires on his ride home.
Maybe he actually meant Biblically accurate? The two are quite easily confused, after all.
Also, remember DeepDream?
Like that.
Thank GOD! I HOPE he can do the Same with Avengers so we can FINALLY get a HISTORICALLY Accurate version of THAT too!
I can’t wait to see what a historically accurate cyclops looks like.
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
Posts must be:
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!