520
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 153 points 1 year ago

Shit like this should be illegal and should allow company to be seized.

[-] ram@bookwormstory.social 124 points 1 year ago

It is illegal, but the US is completely toothless with enforcement on anyone with any amount of wealth.

[-] Dragonmind@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago

Thankfully, Biden recently gave the IRS some teeth to go after millionaires who rely on tax dodging. So there's hope as long as a criminal isn't put in charge to de-teeth the government again.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

And hopefully the pendulum doesn't swing too far next year for all that effort to be rolled back

[-] MisterD@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

The penalties are also so minimal that it's cheaper to re-offend

[-] DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 112 points 1 year ago

"If two people who don't normally speak to each other start speaking, they may be organising"

Making new friends 😤😤😤👎🚫🚫🚫

[-] Flying_Hellfish@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago

Warning signs include terms like "living wage".... fuck me for wanting to live, right?

[-] crashoverride@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yes, fuck you, your mother, your daughter, your son, your grandmother, and granddaughter f ok r wanting to b able to afford to not die.fuck all y'all! Happy fall

[-] matengor@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago
[-] staticblanket@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 year ago

We're not anti-union but we hire the actual fucking Pinkertons to stalk and intimidate you!

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Makes me wonder if we might have battles with them again. States that are anti union also have stand your ground laws.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

Just goes to show you that unions work, otherwise they would not be so scared of it.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You might not interpret the motive as based on fear, if you think your employer loves you wants to make you happy and feel protected.

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Umm, that wouldn't change the truth? I guess I'm confused about what your argument is...

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If everyone already knew the truth, then most arguments would be without value.

[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

Are you trying to say that these videos work because most people do not know the truth?

If that's your point then I agree. But it sounds kinda like you're implying that everyone already knows unions are good and for that reason we should stop saying that they are. Which is patently false.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Someone who relates to employers as though they were benevolent would reach a different conclusion from you about the motive for the presentation.

I think there is no great complexity beneath the observation.

[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

Someone who relates to employers as though they were benevolent would be incorrect in the case against unions though? Unions have shown to be nearly universally beneficial to the workers that participate in them. That is not my opinion. That is verifiable fact.

If a company was strictly benevolent as you've claimed then why contest the union? Why negotiate terms at all? Just hear what the employees en mass want and sign your name on the dotted line. The fact that this does not happen, and we constantly see company's hire law firms to bust the unions or otherwise drag their feet to apply changes to company structure upon reaching a compromise is objectively evidence that the company is not benevolent.

If unions didn't work then there would not be unions.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just so you know, some people really do hold beliefs that are incorrect.

[-] catboss@feddit.de 66 points 1 year ago

I'd like to take this chance to say

Fuck Amazon. Fuck this video. Fuck Amazon. Fuck whoever thinks this is okay. Fuck their management. Fuck this union busting bullshit. Fucking make these assholes pay taxes. Fucking break their shit company up. Also fuck Amazon.

Thanks for coming to my TED Talk.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of fucking. Anyone got any lube?

[-] Fraylor@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Nah man, Amazon needs it raw, uncut, and dry.

[-] Rayspekt@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Raw-dogging Amazon

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Why bother?

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Reminder that Whole Foods is notoriously easy to shoplift from.

[-] oroboros@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago

Wow be on the lookout for people talking to people they didn't talk to before, or people being upset, this is thought police, this is actually, literally, fucking 1984!

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

“We’re not anti-union, but we’re not neutral either.”

Well Amazon, you’re not pro-union, so what exactly are you? ‘Cause that pretty much covers the full spectrum.

[-] krimsonbun 39 points 1 year ago

"Workers have the right to unionize, but-"

[-] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

"We're not anti-union, but fuck unions"

[-] frogfruit@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

Union words: living wage, grievance, contract, representation

Yea, but I want my bug spray delivered to my door for a few small coins less /s

[-] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I don't understand the media professionals who made this. How can you live with yourself?

[-] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

They've unionised and got fuck you money.

[-] Thrife@feddit.de 33 points 1 year ago

Holy shit is this badly done. Starting with no answers whatsoever, why unions are regarded as bad except for "but our customers and partners!" and then a huge load of infodump about potential signs..

[-] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Explaining why they think unions are bad requires them explaining what a union even is.

[-] danwardvs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Not partners, but shareholders. It doesn’t beat around the bush. It outright says “unions are not in the best interest for shareholders”

[-] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 3 points 1 year ago

I was thinking about this the other day and while I'm sure they would never admit it, I think the reason Amazon is so anti-union is to prepare for automation.

Whenever they can reliably replace all the low-income employees with robots, they will do so. If employees had a union they might be able to stop or slow the replacement of people with robots.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

We aren't against unions or organising, but anyone seen doing so is to be immediately reported to their manager's manager's manager so they can ~~be fired immediately~~ kindly defend their right to a direct relationship with the "associate"

[-] HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

"Speed...and customer obsession are not typically associated with unions." Gee, you think?

Usually giant companies like Amazon are overly concerned with optics. So one would think that the long list of "warning signs" to look for in your coworkers' behavior would have made someone go "hey, maybe we should make this a little less fascist before we ok it." Jesus fucking christ.

[-] Staccato@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I can't get past the awful animated guy

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They couldn't get professionals to do the video because the professionals are union members.

[-] stewie410@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

We didn't get a video, but my first employer (Food Lion, a grocery store) did give us almost an identical spiel about once a year as "mandatory training".

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

And, again, your point?

Amazon is afraid of unions. So, you're saying that some workers might not agree? That doesn't contradict the previous statement. Are you arguing in favor of Amazon's actions? Are you criticizing employees who didn't unionize? There doesn't really seem to be any point to your statements.

My apologies for sounding argumentive; my intention is simply to try to understand where you are going with this...

[-] Darkncoldbard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Now do the home depot one

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
520 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

10134 readers
51 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS