520
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Thrife@feddit.de 33 points 1 year ago

Holy shit is this badly done. Starting with no answers whatsoever, why unions are regarded as bad except for "but our customers and partners!" and then a huge load of infodump about potential signs..

[-] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Explaining why they think unions are bad requires them explaining what a union even is.

[-] danwardvs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Not partners, but shareholders. It doesn’t beat around the bush. It outright says “unions are not in the best interest for shareholders”

[-] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 3 points 1 year ago

I was thinking about this the other day and while I'm sure they would never admit it, I think the reason Amazon is so anti-union is to prepare for automation.

Whenever they can reliably replace all the low-income employees with robots, they will do so. If employees had a union they might be able to stop or slow the replacement of people with robots.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
520 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

10011 readers
296 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS