Try reading your own post out loud, get out the rubber duck if you need to, and see if you can understand why you sound like a deranged zealot rather than simply a passionate user.

I'll help you get started: note that every argument you've made starts with a base assumption about your interlocutors pulled from nothing, and note that every assumption conveniently draws a stark dichotomy between you as the informed rational party and the other as a bumbling uninformed moron.

Also notice how you draw lines in the sand that let you completely dismiss any thought you don't like.

Anyone with this view instantly goes in the "doesnt know wtf they are talking about, skill issue" bin.

Ah, I see painting everyone with one brush. Never mind the numerous studies stating otherwise. Oh the irony when you claim others are spreading misinformation.

“the tools are built in unethical and morally deficient ways”.

For coding, not really tbh. People are also deeply misinformed on this as well.

People are still operating on assumptions of how these tools work like its 2023 and not 2026.

So tell me, what has changed? Are we suddenly not gobbling Up the entire internet without permission to train AI models anymore? I must have missed something... (/s)

Honestly, personally, I tend to agree with Linus on his position, but holy fuck you have your hypocritical nose way up in the air.

You don't need to experience suffering to empathize with it.

Listening to the stories of people who are personally dealing with the pushing of data centers into urban areas is heartbreaking and should be a deal killer by itself. Honestly if that doesn't make you angry in the extreme that is very concerning to me.

Watching people lose their livelihoods in a massive wealth transfer should be infuriating. The class warfare is out and plain sight and should feel intolerable.

Watching scores testing decision making skills plummet at alarming speeds, education benchmarks erode, and young people get talked into suicide; all of these things do not require personal experience to understand.

The writing is on the wall, I honestly can not understand reading it and not getting angry.

falsifities

Did AI also tell you this was a word?

As opposed to your comment here?

Maybe ask ChatGPT to think harder next time.

Fundamentally that's a purely ethical decision about whether a machine doing something should be treated with the same understanding the same as a human would. But we don't consider remembering something with a neurochemical storage the samd as taking a picture of something even if they're basically the same.

Digital reproduction is digital reproduction no matter how many extra steps are added to the reproduction process. It's just an algorithm that sorts through a collection of stored data to find specific pieces of data which best fit the keywords supplied by the user, then regurgitates the results that are the best match based on correlation.

In spite of common meaning overlap and popular metaphors, the human brain is not a computer. Ask any neurologist.

This comparison is invalid. Training a neural network algorithm is not equivalent to human learning. We are talking about data stored in machine learning models owned and controlled by multi-billion dollar corporations.

It has already been demonstrated multiple times that original training data can be reproduced completely from models, so yes, they are data storage systems. When they reproduce code which they have previously stored, even only in part, that is a derivative work. Adding extra steps to the transcribing process doesn't make it any less a copy of the original.

All true.

I’m just saying I can understand how people got in that mindset. Everything feels shitty, and it all seems like it’s because of “AI.”

And I think the hate should redirected to the actual perpetrators: the Tech Bros.

And yet he publicly speaks against and attacks these companies all the time. But just this once he's in their pocket?