375
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

Having grown up late 90s into the 2000s I went from buying cds to lime wire to spotify.

In the last 6 months I have found such a greater appreciation for just putting on a whole album and listening to it front to back.

I feel there is a huge loss when going from one artist to another to another all random.

Today I am listening to Refused, The Shape Of Punk To Come

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Depends on the album. Some albums really are like that, but others are just a compiled collection of singles.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Yup. I have very diverse taste un music and I found that some albums are merely a collection of songs written around the same time. While other albums have a set of tracks that share some motifs, and placing them in the right order is important.
And then there are more extreme examples where one song is supposed to lead into the next one with no hard border between the two

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 4 days ago

Depending on the album.

Some albums are made like that, as a cohesive work.

Others are just a bunch of songs put together by approximately release date.

[-] whaleross@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

I'd say most albums are a collection of the songs the band picked out to make it and then arranged in a way that fit the medium back in the day and feels like it makes sense.

OP and others here in the comments are reading way too much into that they have become accustomed to how one song follows another. It's not like most bands play concerts in the album order either.

Personally I liked making mix tapes for myself from vinyl to listen to individual songs in new orders and I really liked when CDs were introduced and you could play shuffle and bring attention to every song as it was a little surprise every time.

That said, I'm glad you've found attentive listening to music, OP. Keep listening to full albums if this helps you do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GorGor@startrek.website 93 points 4 days ago

Yes and no. You gotta listen to the whole thing all the way through at least once. Some albums require repeat listening. Some, you just take the good, toss the bad.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 21 points 4 days ago

If an album only has a couple of songs I enjoy, I tend not to continue following that artist.

For artists that I do enjoy, and I discovered this 40 years ago, I find the best songs on the album are generally not the ones they release as singles.

[-] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

And some I don't think are so great but after a few listening I find them great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] somebody_to_love@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago

Yep. Nothing felt worse than spending 20€ in a CD and realizing that, apart from the hit single, the rest of it was pretty bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deebster@infosec.pub 7 points 4 days ago

Sometimes it takes several listens for me to appreciate a track; sometimes those tracks become my favourites from the album.

[-] AbidingOhmsLaw@lemmy.ml 60 points 4 days ago
[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 15 points 4 days ago

Absolutely, another brick in the wall is awesome to listen too as an album.

I'm annoyed by the remaster i bought on cd that cut the songs in the wrong spot so it would go quiet for for a second af the wrong moment of the song

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

This varies. Some albums are absolutely meant to be listened to back to back in order. Others are just a collection of songs and nothing is lost by missing them into a random playlist.

[-] YawningNostalgia@thelemmy.club 10 points 3 days ago

True of some albums, not all. A lot of albums just have one good song. One of the best concerts I ever went to was a playthrough of an entire album because it was its 10th anniversay and I'd listened to it so many times I knew exactly what was coming next. Best feeling

[-] phx@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it really depends on the album and the way the artist has put it together. Any sort of "mix" album if matters very little the order you play it in, or which songs. Something Iike a concert recording, an (e.g. Pink Floyd) album where one song transitions to another, or a Rock Opera that tells a story across songs, the specific songs played and order can matter a lot!

I've got my own music collection on a self-hosted server which I can stream to my devices, and would love to have some sort of "not a singular/standalone" flag for songs which really don't fit or sound good outside of the larger album when I'm playing random/mix mode.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] moopet@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

This depends. A lot of albums aren't coherent "pieces of art", and the track listing is ordered and selected by execs other than the artist, so it's kind of meaningless. "Greatest hits" albums are also not relevant.

But yeah, this is a big reason why I went back to vinyl and cassette - I select something, put it on, and listen to it straight through without skipping, because that would require me to get up off my chair and walk across the room. Life hack amiright.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I get that, but also movies are a single piece of art, and sometimes I just want to jump to the machete battle scene in The Raid. I still love the whole thing, but sometimes I only got like 5 minutes until my lunch break is over.

[-] datavoid@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

I used to have a friend who would ALWAYS play between 30 minutes and 1 hour of the start of Ace Ventura 2, then stop it and play it again from the beginning. Fucking infuriating

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FishFace@piefed.social 21 points 4 days ago

This is how I listen to music, but also this isn't a shower thought, it's just your opinion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

For many, absolutely! That's how they were intended, and they deserve it.

Others, it's just ten songs randomly arranged.

Pretty good litmus test on whether they're good musicians or just corporate karaoke.

[-] groet@feddit.org 31 points 4 days ago

Pretty good litmus test on whether they're good musicians or just corporate karaoke.

Is a book of short stories or poems not art, just because it is not a monolithic novel.

An Album with 10 independent songs can still be a fully artistic package. Maybe each song is ment to be experience on it's own. Maybe the art form is to deliver a succinct and complete piece in 3-5 minutes?

[-] MurrayL@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Agreed. There’s so much pointless elitism and snobbishness in this thread; very disappointing from so-called music fans.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] msfroh@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

A fun counterpoint to the "albums weren't meant to be shuffled" argument is Apollo 18 by TMBG.

On the track list, "Fingertips" is track 17, followed by "Space Suit" at track 38. That's because Fingertips is actually 21 mini songs (mostly 10 seconds or less), each with their own track, that are supposed to appear randomly between full songs when you listen on shuffle.

On the other hand, modern streaming services usually just have a single track for Fingertips, so I'm now used to hearing those 21 mini songs in the original, "play it straight through" order.

[-] CetaceanNeeded@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I mean they do play Fingertips as a single song live, because it's hilarious and fun.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Maybe back in the day when bands would spend months and months assembling an album that had a generally cohesive style. Now it seems a lot of bands throw a bunch of stuff at the wall hoping something will stick. A good album today is the exception, not the expectation.

Not all art belongs in the Louvre.

[-] MurrayL@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That happened back in the day too. Low effort releases are nothing new, we just ignore/forget all the bad stuff and end up with rose-tinted glasses.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Aeri@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Yeah unfortunately I disagree. There are plenty of albums where I like literally one song and don't much care for anything else on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Noggog@programming.dev 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Eh, dont agree. Yeah, I think listening to a whole album is important on occasion and can give a cool perspective. But I've found that the range of things I enjoy increases with shuffle. There's so much stuff that I love... in unexpected short spurts. Im not talking hits, but just random decent stuff. I think there's something lost when an album has to be good enough that you intentionally pull it off the shelf and listen to it for an hour. Hordes of cool things won't meet that level.

[-] ThunderComplex@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago

While I agree that there definitely are albums where listening to them in their entirety enhances the experience (Metropolis 2, Octavarium), I generally prefer picking out the best songs of an album and listening to those instead.
Not all albums are made of bangers and have songs I’d never listen to a second time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

Yes, but also no.

There was a time when albums were created by artists with the intent that they should be listened to start to finish.

But at some point albums changes to being a collection of songs trying to be “hits”

[-] MurrayL@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Albums as monolithic artistic creations definitely peaked in the 70s-80s, but albums as a simple collection of songs have existed for almost as long as recorded music. Until the late-1960s it was the norm; we’re just experiencing a return to that being the dominant format.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Absolutely not, most albums have a bunch of skippable junk between the interesting stuff, and exist best as a few tracks on a mixtape. There are a small number of albums that are best experienced as a single piece - e.g Pink Flag, In The Court Of The Crimson King, Woof. - but they're exceptions rather than the norm.

[-] prole 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I generally agree. However, especially nowadays (and back in the early 60s before Pet Sounds and Rubber Soul), not all albums are written to be listened to as a whole. We've gone back to (many, not all) albums just being a collection of singles.

For better or worse (worse imo).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Caesium@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

God one of my favorite albums of all time is Those Who Tell The Truth Shall Die Those Who Tell The Truth Shall Live Forever by Explosions in the Sky.

While I enjoy shuffling my music for the chaos my library brings, the way each song blends into each other in the studio album is my absolute favorite. It really makes the experience

[-] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Nah, most songs suck. I'll listen to the one or two good ones.

[-] Knuschberkeks@leminal.space 2 points 3 days ago

depends, some artists just have a few good songs and a lot of filler. In my experience, the further away from mainstream pop you go the higher the likelihood to encounter great albums with no filler.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

Sounds like you're just making your own albums

[-] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago

Why I wrote a somewhat bad shuffle utility so sometimes it doesn't select a random song from my music library but sometimes picks the next neighboring song file for those album-specific messages from the artist.

[-] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 10 points 4 days ago

Album ≠ album. There are certainly ones worthy of listening to them as a whole. But there are plenty of albums that are just utter garbage too. The war on the single by record companies in the 90s produced a number of albums that were at best a couple of okay singles plus 8-10 pure fillers. Name another Chumbawamba song, you can't without googling.

In a way we are reverting back to the 1950s where the single reigned supreme and albums were an afterthought. Now the single song does better than an album again. Some musicians release every streamlined Spotify curated 2 minute song as a "single." Since most of it is done digitally only why not?

Dogma is useless.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

Today I am listening to Refused, The Shape Of Punk To Come

[-] caradenada@feddit.cl 4 points 3 days ago

That's quite an arrogant thing to say. Why do you think you have any saying in how other people consume art?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No, not at all. There are usually only a few pieces i like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mac@mander.xyz 8 points 4 days ago

How very prog of you. 🤙

Some albums, yes. But not all.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

good albums should

there are lots of albums that aren't good albums

that said, the albums I listen to often are absolutely front to back listening

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
375 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

43010 readers
94 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS