1270
submitted 1 week ago by not_IO to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Murse@slrpnk.net 111 points 1 week ago
[-] SnotFlickerman 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Stop I can only get so eShrekt

[-] TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Expires in 3024? Nice.

[-] dudeface@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

If you transfer me Bitcoin I will send back triple

[-] Stache_@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

wave2:flash1: Trimming armor!

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Captain America at the meeting

[-] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 week ago

Complain to your local government. Yes, many websites are guilty of surveillance capitalism themselves and are lobbying for it, but the recent push was largely in response to new surveillance laws passed by governments under various guises, such as protecting the youth.

[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 week ago

My government are pushing for this stuff though.

Which is why I am here now instead of on reddit where I got fed up of being asked to submit for facial and ID scans. Fuck that! I have seen some of my comments online, there is no way I want my ID permanently attached to that.

[-] not_IO 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

welcome! great choice!

I originally planned to just join the boycott for only a month, like 2 years ago because of the third party apps thing

but I ended up never going back because lemmy is so much more chill, interesting and fun to me

[-] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Yes, I assumed so. Welcome to Lemmy! I meant: Complain to your government about it! Only when they are pressured by enough citizens is they're a chance that they may reconsider.

[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago

If they associate my online identity with my real one, i am so cooked, i said certain stuff...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

I found out that when confronted with ID surveillance I don't really want to visit that site after all.

Companies keep pushing security onto the user at the same time as demanding more personal data.

They can suck my....

[-] not_IO 13 points 1 week ago

they have data breaches all the time, if they don't outright sell it, even to ICE. It's insane if them to try and frame this as secure

[-] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

I remember a few years back facebook had me 'verify' my account by sending them a copy of my ID. I sent them a stock image of a random dude flipping the bird and my 'ID' got accepted.

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

For a shady steam keys reselling site, I once sent a picture of my id with literally everything blacked out but my name (they had that from my credit card), and it got accepted too

[-] BrickEater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Instagram tried that with me a few years ago too and I just made a new account lol

[-] istdaslol@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago

They need it to profile new models for their trump island in Albania

[-] tourist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Sure, I can give you a government ID

it won't be real or it won't be mine

good luck verifying it with the South African department of home affairs

it takes months to get an actual government ID issued

if I have to wait that long,

I'm using a different website

dickhead

spoiler@not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone how do I make that cool word art

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune 4 points 1 week ago

The beauty of the DHA 🇿🇦

[-] PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Why can’t I upvote this more than once?!

[-] KokoSabreScruffy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Duh, because you need a govt id to upvote it twice.

load more comments (1 replies)

It boggles my mind why Americans and the UK would accept this.

Wait, no it doesn't.

[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 week ago

I don't accept it. But wtf can I do about it? Other than abandon every platform that asks for ID. But I have already done that. Which is why I am here.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's very simple. Any website that asks for ID clearly doesn't want any traffic.

The problem is the corruption at the level where accepting or not matters. There's always corruption, but competing interests can help dissipate organized attempts at it.

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I haven’t seen a platform ask for it yet.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Its happening in the EU too.

It's following more of an OAuth model in the EU rather than give private-company-selling-your-data-off-to-Palantir model.

[-] StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

we don't accept it current government is pushing for it regardless of lack of it in their manifesto I didn't even vote for them

[-] MonaySimpson@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I wanted to start using Monero. But found I have no way of buying it in my country without giving gov ID to the exchange.

Some Know Your Customer legalities. Fucking sucks.

The only other way is sketchy P2P trade sites where you have to trust the person at the other end.

[-] rounding_error@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

Using Local Monero (I’m assuming what you are referring to) is fairly safe in low amounts ($50)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But have you considered purchasing this bauble online

[-] Voltarion@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

I am kinda on the fence with that. On one hand, I am wary of control it may give. On the other, we have children watching hardcore p##n and bots and troll farms spreading disinformation.

[-] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Where are the parents those children belong to? Why do we need to parent for them?

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Every child throughout history got up to secret exploring when they were out of their parents control. This happens to good parents and bad parents alike. It's natural for children to explore the world and be curious about it's dark corners. While we need parental supervision, we also need societal control. It takes a village to raise a child.

[-] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Don't care. Not my kids and I didn't volunteer to help raise them. Parenting is hard. Really sucks for them. Glad I didn't choose that. I have zero fucking sympathy. Why should my privacy be violated because people don't want to parent?

"Societal control" is probably this most dystopian thing I've read today.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Are "Stop Signs" dystopic? Don't answer. It seems you've got your mind made up, and that's cool.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah! We've got to add more stop signs because of all the reckless child drivers on the road!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I would counter:

Then why are these things okay for adults?

There is nothing normal about mass consumption of troll farms and bots. The user facing internet is broken and unhealthy, and it’s absolutely mad we pretend like it isn’t. Banning it from children is not a fix.

Middle schoolers passing around deepfakes nudes is pretty messed up, yep, but again I argue: why are they so accessible in the first place? It wouldn’t be a widespread problem as something from the depths of the internet, but it is when it’s a freaking Twitter service.

EDIT: I will admit the later is a sticky issue though, as it’s pretty easy for some random shop in a distant country to set up a deepnude storefront on a website. Even if we kill their ability to market it via ads, little shits around the world will find it and pass it around.

It needs a cultural fix, I suppose. Parents need to teach it as taboo, like they do for creepy IRL behavior, and that + not so trivial accessibility should dampen it.

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Middle schoolers passing around deepfakes nudes

I have no data to confirm this but I'd wager it's disproportionately kids using that kind of stuff. I think the vast majority of adults who want to look at some titties or whatever are perfectly happy cranking it to one of the millions of freely available pictures and videos out there.

Hell, last month I had to factory reset some kid's phone because they downloaded some "undressing app" that obviously turned out to be malware. I've helped adults and seniors with their tech before and they do dumb shit too but I've never seen one do that.

These kids need sex ed and tech aid. It's one thing for a teenager to undress Jessica from history class in their mind, but it's an entirely different one to download some dubious app and provide it with pictures of Jessica for it to effectively produce CSAM

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know, I’d argue it’s hard to stop kids from doing that privately. If they want to use some local model to undress Jessica from history class, for only their eyeballs… well, that genie is out of the bottle unless we take everyone’s computers away.

Morally, I’d argue it’s similar to using their imagination.


Now, where it crosses another line is spreading those nudes.

Or even worse, selling them.

No one should be allowed to make money off that. Not the financial processors that facilitate it if they “buy” an undressing service, not the social media platforms that advertise it to them in the first place; they should all be crushed to dust with liability. And kids should get in deep trouble if they pass it around, just like they would if they ripped Jessica’s clothes off in broad daylight.

This is what I’m getting at. It’s the platforms that are negligent, here. If some real-world platform was facilitating it in this way, the owners would be in prison.

[-] topperharlie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

None of "for the children" initiatives do anything good for them, prevents anything or saves any of them. Also, in most cases politicians who actually rape kids are always exempt.

As a rule of thumb, never trust any "for the children", "for security" or "against terrorism". It never is about those things, and even if some of the people involved think it is, it gives the ill intended people great weapons against free speech, privacy, healthy democracy... These slogans are always to target people's irrationality and stop them from actually having logical thinking about the implications. They used them in the past and continue to do so because they work.

The people spreading misinformation will continue to do so because they sooner or later end up in power, and none of these laws will control the government, only the people. Which in itself should trigger you to not trust it.

[-] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

If it was about the children, they would have done something with the Epstein files.

[-] KernelTale@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

Kids will absolutely find a way around that. Pornhub and similar sites are nowhere close to real hardcore stuff which I will bet all my money on will not implement age verification. Kids will just shift to less mainstream websites with little or no moderation like allowing zoophilia. Even if they somehow censured it almost all like CP how long do you think it will take them to download Tor or a free VPN harvesting their data? There will definitely be that one kid in 6th grade who will spread the word. Even we as kids browsed darknet that was only out of curiosity. Install spyware on your kid's hardware if you want them to have hard time bypassing it until of a proper age either by buying their own hardware or being smarter than their parents.

As for disinformation. My discord accounts are getting banned left and right for bot-like activity even though I only use them to separate identities and are 100% human traffic but without a no longer valid email. Idk how scammers bypass it but they probably steal user accounts.

TLDR; It solves nothing but empowers bigger threats even without government overreach.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Idk, I watched hardcore porn as a teenager and I turned out fine. Didn't everyone? Masturbating to magazines or PG13 movies somehow seems more perverted than porn.

[-] cosmos8188@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

I think he means children in this case. Like a teenager is literally more than fine looking at the stuff as long as its not some fucked up shit (but that applies to everyone really).

The thing op misses, is the usecase of parental controls. Children should absolutely be guided around the internet, until they grow up to being teenagers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Strava wants my birthdate now ... like wtf ...

[-] uriel238 3 points 1 week ago

My favorite is 1941-12-07. Bots can't tell it's fake, but American humans will know it probably is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
1270 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40922 readers
2853 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS