562
submitted 1 month ago by B0rax@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 96 points 1 month ago

Hey, german government, parliament and federal council. This is how that works, now do that, too. For fucks sake!

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 52 points 1 month ago

Good, fuck them and their anti-democratic brethren.

[-] jangyik@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

as much as i hate AfD and the far right, i think banning them will just put fuel on the fire and it gives them easy propaganda material, where they can pose as the victims here

it’s a really hard situation and banning feels like the bad move to me tbh

[-] robear@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 month ago

Tolerance paradox.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 17 points 1 month ago

Amputation is a valid course of treatment while the cancer or infection is spreading. Leaving the limb alone can lead to dead much more quickly.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 13 points 1 month ago

Take it from us in the USA, do not fuck around with these types of groups

[-] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago

Banning a political party leads to a loss of funding and they're not allowed to get back together in the same or similar constellation. It would set them back for at least a decade and destroys all of the work they put into their Nazi projects. It absolutely helps and it's absolutely vital that this ban happens.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AntisocialNTwo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Nice, take nazies (and Putin pawns) down one party at time

[-] Goldholz 17 points 1 month ago

ESN is all about freedoms and democracy unless it goes against their interests

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago

Maybe the people downvoting your comment should've read the article to figure out what ESN stands for.

[-] creamfresh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

to clarify: ESN is the EU's far right party pool.

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

You just enabled people to continue not reading the article :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

Just your average fascists. It's always the same with them, wherever you look.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

So theyre banning the group these parties are a part of, and no the parties. Thats not even clickbait, thats just misinformation if im reading this correctly.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 28 points 1 month ago

This is about parties in the EU parliament which are made up of representatives from national parties. The EU can't ban parties on a national level.

[-] Little1Lost@gehirneimer.de 16 points 1 month ago

pls make it happen

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LeoDalPozzo@infosec.pub 12 points 1 month ago

Banning a party will not magically make the support they have disappear. When people with fascist views get isolated, we only make them close more and more in their own bubble, which will just create more extremism. It's the same with people that make fun of flat earthers. You are not going to change their mind, you are just sending them deeper into their delusions. People still don't get that banning everything we don't like is not a long term solution, but makes the problem worse (war on drugs, forbidding prostitution, etc)

[-] B0rax@feddit.org 25 points 1 month ago

It will not magically cure all problems, but it is indeed important to ban them. It will do multiple things, for example they will not receive any EU funding or other support. It will also prohibit them from advertising their views and they will not have a platform anymore in television and radio. Which will reduce the amount of propaganda they can spread and therefore reducing the impact they have on the population and in return reduce the support they have.

And this is just one aspect.

[-] LeoDalPozzo@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago

I disagree. Trump got elected (twice) with >30 felonies and after having said all sort of things that only few years ago would have made him completely uncandidable. Deplatforminng doesn't have the impact that it used to have and only make the person look like "they are going against the strong powers", that's why the afd in germany keeps getting stronger despite the multiple bans, Trump in the US, the neo-fascists movements in the uk, the neofascists in Italy. What has calling these people "fascists" and isolating them has achieved? Only raising their consent. Also, television and radio are not so meaningful anymore as they used to be, internet has made them completely obsolete and most people take their info from the latter. It's counterintuitive, but the political history of the last 10 years has proven this multiple times. It's very useful to look into how cult works and what's the best way to unlock them. Isolating the people in the cult is the worst move one can make.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago

Trump was not deplatformed, if anything the total opposite of that.

[-] LeoDalPozzo@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

True, but not because they didn't try, which is my point. The attempt was to make him so much of a monster and demonise him that nobody would have voted him. The point was to isolate him and they achived the opposite, as you correctly said.

[-] mabeledo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Reporting on his crimes and policies is not demonising him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

If the republican party was banned after the first trump presidency, they wouldn't have recovered fast enough to get a second presidency. Most likely they would have stayed fractured and we may have gotten actual reforms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tty5@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

If you can't neutralize a toxic spill you contain it instead.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] abc@suppo.fi 12 points 1 month ago

Far too late but good luck.

[-] yoriaiko 10 points 1 month ago

Do anyone have full list of parties that may get banned?

Article mentions obvious German afd, forum for democracy - fvd from Netherlands, Bulgarian revival and spd from Czechia directly. European esn party as mix of these and 6 more. Guess that's all about them?

While EU gov on many levels, have way more far right or extremist groups, would they be affected too (pls be)?

[-] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Yes, let us learn from past mistakes for once!

[-] Ice@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Not a fan. This is inherently anti-democratic, regardless of the views that the efn espouses.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 32 points 1 month ago

These groups are themselves anti-democratic. Democracy is allowed to defend itself.

[-] TheFadingOne@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would go further, democracy must defend itself. It's an embarrassing failure to allow anti-democratic parties to gain power through democratic means.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Reality@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago

There is no room for fascists.

[-] Mushroomtoes 10 points 1 month ago

Check out the concept of the tolerance paradox, it might shift your point of view a bit. Think there's a copy pasta of a nazi bar that's in a similar context

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

You are wrong. People like this shouldn't be given a chance to be voted for, lest their propaganda wins and we end up in a full blown WW3.

Obviously these powers to ban a party must be kept under high scrutiny of the public incase they start banning all of their competition, but in this case right now It is good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 7 points 1 month ago

Ain't it the same parliament that recently passed mass invigilation of EU citizens without a vote?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Quite the contrary. That mass surveilance was pushed through by the EU commision against the parliament that already rejected it (twice).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vane@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just want to mention that this procedure is raised by party that have majority right now in parliament. That are European People's Party - christian and conservative. They are the same as MAGA just not as radical (yet) as AfD. Whoever thinks that's good thing may go to hell because I don't want to be ruled by christian conservative idiots but I want them to fight against each other so they can show their true nature.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Let's see how the 30% of nazis and / or uneducated idiots who voted for them will react.

[-] starlinguk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

There are a LOT of far right MEPs who pretend they're not far right and are members of the conservative parties. So I'm not holding my breath.

Also wondering when Weidel will be arrested for treason.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
562 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11866 readers
420 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS