83
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 23 points 1 day ago

So, either Fauci was a terrible doctor and Trump was a giant idiot to keep him in place

OR

Fauci was good at his job, and Trump is a backstabber who turned on him.

Either way, it seems like Trump is the one who is terrible at his job.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Either way, it seems like Trump is the one who is terrible at his job.

Sound reasoning but his feelings don't care about your facts

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Sigh. Why does everything have to have some Big Dark Conspiracy behind it?

Nearly everyone that barely graduated high school or just outright dropped out, seems to think that they have the "real story" behind something like Covid. Because they "did their own research".

These people usually don't even realize (Dunning-Kruger) that they simply don't have the skills to do that. That's why they did so poorly at school and why they didn't go on to - or finish - a higher degree, at least not in something more difficult to attain. They may not even have basic reading comprehension, probably have poor numeracy skills, and are not even aware of logical fallacies. The likelihood of them being auto-didactic is not very high.

It's exhausting.

And morons and bad faith actors like Gabbard feed into it, FFS.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Because ridiculous conspiracy theories are the only way to thread the needle when you absolutely must ignore Occam's razor.

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't need to read this to remember that Trump stood on stage and literally told people they were investigating using brilliant light and injecting disinfectant

His medical officer rolled her eyes in the background

He also insulted Biden for wearing a mask whilst his cabinet was promoting invermectin

His impact rebooted the cooker movement.

People look back like "covid wasn't that bad".. but, the reality is everyone has been somewhat exposed at this point or been vaccinated. Those same people would say the same about small pox after benefiting from herd immunity

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

Over a million people died domestically, people really think it wasn't that bad?

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I'm in Australia, we have plenty of cookers who think it was fine (we did actually implement masking and social distancing here and have a really high vaccination rate, so the cookers think they just have super immune systems).

[-] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

So instead if investigating Fauci, they should investigate Gabbard - simple as that.

[-] dwemthy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Tulsi Gabbard the cult asset?

[-] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

Or Tulsi Gabbard the Russian asset?

[-] garbagehead@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Running cover for the preferred narrative once again. Ugh.

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
83 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30176 readers
2301 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS