196
submitted 2 days ago by stenAanden@feddit.dk to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"I don't disagree, but there is disagreement" Is essentially what he's saying. WTF. Just say you fucking disagree, or if you don't, why the fuck say anything at all? Is it because you're a homophobe?

[-] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago
[-] Solaris1220@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In reality, I believe there are much greater, more important issues, such as justice, equality

mf saying they want to focus on equality while at the same time saying gay couples blessings, something that would bring EQUALITY, isn’t a priority… make it make sense 🤡

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 42 points 2 days ago

Some animals are more equal than others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

They believe marriage is for the sole purpose of procreation, which is their little loophole. They’re so weird about it that I’m surprised they’ve never pushed fertility tests as a pre requisite before allowing a marriage ceremony.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

They don't believe that. They just say that. It'd be crazy if they actually believed it. Any reasonable person knows it's just bad faith rhetoric, not a true belief.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Having been raised in the faith (I’ve walked away for a multitude of reasons) I assure you they do believe it. You’re not even allowed to take contraceptives or have a vasectomy

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

If that actually were the belief, sterile people would not be allowed to be married, and people's marriages would be annualled when they become sterile, through age or otherwise. Unless they're asking for these, they do not believe it. They may believe that they believe it, but they don't.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They say those things are god’s will and thus not an issue. They leave the door open for “miracles” to occur.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Then they should be happy with same sex marriages. A miracle might occur with them just as well.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Works for me

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Again, I'm reasonably certain they don't actually believe a 90 year old woman is suddenly going to get pregnant, or a woman who doesn't have a uterus anymore, or whatever else. These might be the words they're told to repeat to justify things, but they don't believe them. Not even the most devout would believe that.

They may believe God could technically do this, but then he could also technically do the same for same sex couples. He's omnipotent, according to them, after all. His powers are not limited to only making miracles pregnancies to hetero couples. It's no more outrageous than expecting people physically incapable of becoming pregnant becoming pregnant. If they justify this belief based on miricles, then same sex marriage is equally justified. (This is not their belief. They don't believe the former premise, but this is the conclusion that it'd lead to.)

[-] Snowies@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Then they should dissolve their marriages once their children move out, having fulfilled its only purpose. Staying married after you’re done having kids is lust, pride, and vanity.

/s

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago

marriage is a union between man and woman, as per the Bible

[-] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Bats are birds, as per the Bible. Donkeys talk, as per the Bible. Slave owning is cool as long as you don’t beat them to death, as per the Bible.

There’s plenty of stuff in the Bible that’s utter garbage.

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago

verses please

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

not bait nor weak

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

Infertility is a cause for marriage annulation. So it's controlled, but a posteriori.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe 71 points 2 days ago

Why would gay couples want to be blessed by a religion that actively demonizes them?

[-] nevetsg@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

There are plenty of LBG Christians. I will try to give you the 1 paragraph answer from a protestant. All humans are sinners so religion "activity demonized" all of humanity. But luckily, all sins are forgiven through Jesus Christ. So whilst they may be living in sin, so is everyone and we are all forgiven equally.
If you didn't actually want an answer then it is you own fault for including the question mark.

[-] VeganCheesecake 1 points 1 day ago

No TQ Christians?

[-] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Because they were raised Catholic and they want their church to stop demonizing them. Blessing them would be a start. People are taught religion from a young age, perhaps younger than they have any kind of sexual identity. Therefore their whole concept of “them” may be as much Catholic as it is gay.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

To troll the pope

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago
[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 30 points 2 days ago

Am I misreading? leo is saying he does NOT agree with the cardinal saying it's fine for same-sex marriage?

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 71 points 2 days ago

Yeah. Cause he's still a homophobic piece of shit, he's just an anti-war homophobic piece of shit. We should not be surprised by this.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 16 points 2 days ago

figured as much, i guess. TIL the catholic church is bigoted as fuck. More at ten.

[-] pressedhams 18 points 2 days ago

Just today you learned the Catholic Church is bigoted?

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

To his credit he is slightly less homophobic than is the norm for the Catholic Church. But that's kind of like saying someone is less fascist than Mussolini. Objectively better than the alternative, but not actually good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago

homophobic? homophobic means hating gay people the pope does not hate ANY people he hates their sin all are welcome within the church

[-] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Just as I hate your sin of being a dumb fuck, but I love you as a person still.

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago

thats not a sin and thanks

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 13 points 2 days ago

Periodic reminder: the Episcopal Church exists. Has all the rituals and sacraments, the Apostolic Succession, but also ordains women and Queer people to the priesthood and blesses their marriages. The Episcopal Church is present in Germany (part of the Episcopal Church in Europe, formerly known as the Convocation of Episcopal Churches in Europe).

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago

so the catholic church but it is not catholic nor a church?

[-] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 7 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure I understand this question. It's literally a church and it defines itself as part of the "One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church" same as the Roman Catholic Church does. That latter part is debated by the Roman Catholic Church (but even Pope Paul VI was open to the fact that Anglican Christianity sits in a space quite different from that of "Protestantism" writ large--the Episcopal Church is part of the global community of Anglican churches, being rooted in the Church of England).

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago

a church that supports sin instead of trying to lesd people to Christ?-

[-] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 3 points 1 day ago

Okay, now I see where you're coming from. If you actually want to engage with some different thinking about Christianity, here's a thing I wrote a ways back regarding same-sex marriage and the Church. It's not perfect and was debated a fair bit on a different Lemmy thread several weeks back, but I think it helps introduce some key thinking about this topic. But for some reason I suspect that you're not interested in a good-faith discussion.

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago

the church of England, ah yes

Catholic but really not doesnt follow the pope at all

hmmmmmm

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
196 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55837 readers
2470 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS