215

The motivations that have contributed to the separatist movement and Alberta’s sense of grievance in recent years are not especially discrete; it’s more like a nebulous Venn diagram. Simple politics have pushed some people toward separatism. Indeed, the paucity of separatist talk during the time when Stephen Harper was prime minister suggests there’s a significant political component to the idea; when Liberals are in power, people feel more inclined to talk about leaving. Culture also plays a role. When Angus Reid pollsters talked to separatists in February 2026, 86.5 percent said they thought Canada forced Alberta to take in too many immigrants, and 96 percent believed that an independent Alberta would better protect personal freedoms.

But ... separatists tend to find the economic arguments particularly seductive. Angus Reid polling shows 96 percent of respondents who want an independent Alberta believe they would be free from economically damaging federal government policies. Separatist leaders promise the elimination of the personal income tax while creating a new provincial sales tax of 5 percent. They also claim Alberta would save $75 billion from no longer paying federal taxes.

Not all separatists promise immediate prosperity, but the argument remains persuasive. Cameron Davies is the leader of the Republican Party of Alberta. “I don’t paint an immediate rosy, utopian picture of what independence looks like,” he says. “Will it be difficult? Yes. Will it be immediate sunshine and rainbows? Probably not. But will it be worth it? Five, ten, fifteen years down the road for your kids and your grandkids? One hundred percent yes.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Godort@lemmy.ca 83 points 2 weeks ago

Call me a conspiracy theorist, but it really feels like the separation thing is mostly a guise so that the US can step in and "save" the struggling and destitute Alberta.

More likely some ill advised Canadian Oil exec that thinks that they will be better off in the US.

Albertan separatists tend to forget that nobodies want their oil, it’s too costly to transform. The only reason they have a place at the table is that the Federal government massively finance it.

At Trump first term their were talks about passing TransMountain down to the US, they refuse because even TM didn’t respect the American safety standards which is fucking low.

Thinking that thing will change in the US or as Independent nation is fucking laughable, at best Trump or the US will use Alberta to spearhead an invasion of the North for their critical mineral

[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

If Alberta becomes the 51st state, all the Newfies will head home leaving a large labour shortage in the oil fields. Being an American state, Alberta will have to follow American immigration practices. It would be a real shock for people in Alberta. Lots of Americans would flood in and take Albertians' jobs, just by the shear volume of people in the States, they have almost 350million people.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Back in the day Civilization had a scenario where the US was supporting Quebec in a war of independence.

Alberta sounds a lot more likely.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure it has nothing to do with their oil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

When one of the people being interviewed leads the Republican Party of Alberta, it's hard to believe they're anything but American shills. But there will be Albertans who think it was purely a coincidence that led to such a catchy name.

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

USA funded Brexit, USA funded the fucker kkklownvoy, USA is funding Alberta “separatism”.

[-] Someone@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Carney needs to start a loud public investigation into foreign money. Expose these jerks.

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

It’s obviously the USA. Why would Carney upset his overlords?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 weeks ago

The thing that really gets me is, Alberta doesn't like how hard it is to build a pipeline that would run into other provinces, and how in the world is being a separate country supposed to help with that? Do they think building across an international border will be easier than building across an interprovincial one?

[-] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

Can we use "separatists" instead of "albertans"?

The loudmouth morons are a very small percentage of Albertans. A lot smaller than Quebec's loudmouth morons.

[-] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

Quebec separatism would still end poorly for everyone, but at least they have access to the ocean.

[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Quebec separatism would good bad, but at least they have a chance of France bailing them out. The USA would not be kind to Alberta, the USA does not extend constitutional legal protection to its territories.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

I doubt they do much thinking

[-] voluble@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

Alberta separatists are illogical and unwise - never underestimate the depths to which they have not thought about a particular issue. Unfortunately, this is equally true of the current provincial government as well.

[-] wraekscadu@vargar.org 7 points 2 weeks ago

Nah the separatists think that dealing with the US would be easier. By "dealing", they mean annexation. Sigh...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago

... Cameron Davies is the leader of the Republican Party of Alberta

Jfc. :/

[-] Pistcow@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

So is like Alberta the Mississippi of Canada?

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 weeks ago

It's more like the Texas of Canada.

[-] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

Given the UCP just voted to rig the electoral map...more than ever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

“Honestly, I hate this country right now. If I could leave, I would.”

Darling, If I could throw you out, I would.

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

Alberta screwed themselves when they rejected national energy program that would have cost them some provincial control in exchange for building Canadian energy self sufficiency. They would have pipelines crisscrossing Canada and refineries to boot to get 'their' oil to. However they were hoodwinked by US corporate interest into rejecting the NEP and they have been taken advantage of by those same corporate interests ever since. Along with that the Alberta government has spend every waking moment blaming Ottawa. No AB sales tax to even out cyclical O&G revenues? Ottawa's fault, somehow. Not enough environmental deposits to clean up after the O&G company has taken all the profits it wants and offshored them? Ottawa's fault. No refineries? US extraction companies want to refine in US and close Canadian sites, Ottawa's fault. Petro Canada. Short sightedly sold by Conservatives. Was Ottawa's fault but at the behest of Alberta.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like Texas with their stupid separate energy grid that crashes all the fucking time and causes old people to die. Maybe they can both secede at the same time and start their own country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

I can imagine a mass exodus too. I live here. I'd rather be homeless and jobless made destitute with a mortgage on a made worthless house than American.

[-] dou9m@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

As an American, I’d be jealous of your homelessness especially when you don’t get imprisoned for said homelessness.

Oops sorry gotta go back to working for pennies at the child labor factory!

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe not jailed but left outside to die in winter instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I wonder if they included the cost of armed forces, border and customs agencies, foreign embassies, aviation and environmental regulatory agencies, national pension systems, and federal service staffing in their calculations? Or are they assuming the two behemoths landlocking them would just... let them be...? Both Canada and the US could decimate Alberta economically and I can see the current US administrarion doing it purposefully with the intention of annexing them.

Sometimes I wonder if separatists really just want Alberta to be a part of the US since we all know that's how this would play out in the end.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

That's the plan, that's why they meet with US officials.

[-] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

...and for Canada

That's why the shitheads are funding it

[-] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

So, if Alberta reaches the promised land of glorious independence or whatever, how exactly do they plan on trading outside their borders without being taxed to oblivion by one of two much larger bordering nations any time we try to get resources in or out?

[-] ElegantBeef@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

If you believe the APP's website they want to use the UN's 'Law of the Sea', but they also don't want to be a part of the UN cause they do not share values. So seemingly they think they can, they think they can.

[-] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ah yes, wanting all of the benefits without any commitment or obligation on their part. Sounds like Albertan logic to me!

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

trade Alberta for Washington, Oregon, and California

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

And Minnesota! I'd much rather be Canadian

[-] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Some sane people live in Alberta, so no we wont be doing that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LoveCanada@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

What non Albertans need to understand is that "the separatists" in Alberta are two different groups. There are a significant number of Albertans who are upset with the way Alberta has been milked as a cash cow for decades without the corresponding political power like the populous provinces out east. Mostly they want to express their displeasure and if that means some sabre rattling and threats of separation thats fine. It works for Quebec and they just want to follow the same playbook. They would be the mild separatists who may or may not see the value in having Alberta be an independent state within Canada, but they are still a minority.

Then there are the radical separatists who believe that Alberta should separate and join the US. That is a VERY small group of people. If anything Albertans are fiercely independent, with an "I can do it myself" attitude and the last thing the vast majority wants is to jump out of a stable democracy into the shit show that exists down south.

So when you say 'separatists' you have to be clear who you are talking about. MOST of us want a more fair deal for Alberta but we're not pro US and particularly not pro Trump.

[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It works for Quebec and they just want to follow the same playbook

Us Québécois are linguistically, culturally, and ethnically separate from the rest of Canada. Alberta is just culturally “pessimistic”, so it’ll never work for them to become independent. They’ll trip over their own dicks when it comes down to who will lead them amongst the conservatives. If the Middle East is any precedent, good luck pitting a jungle of conservative groups against each other for control. They can’t function without unity, which the Albertans lack on a fundamental level. They’re just going to remain the dicks who live out west and complain about social programs in QC and BC.

[-] AGM@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's probably fair when talking about the electorate broadly, but also leaves out the powerful special interests contributing to shaping and manipulating the movement, and which have much more direct and influential access to provincial government than your average Jane or Joe. Those interests, and the stakeholders to which they're most responsive, need to be included as part of any discussion of how this movement is developing.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think, if you don't like where you live, you should move, but you can't take your land with you. I also think, if you don't care about separation but push the agenda just to entangle yourself with powerful cabals above and beyond your reach, should be a special kind of treason.

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

I could care less if a bunch of rednecks want to leave Canada, the problem is it immediately becomes part of the US. They are not saying that part loudly enough.

[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

LOL, the US is not going to create another state, it's too political. Best the USA can do is create another territory, similar to Puetro Rico. Under US law for territories, "fundamental rights apply as a matter of law, but other constitutional rights are not available", meaning that the US gets to determine what laws apply and what laws don't. Being a legal backwater means no one will be directly investing into Alberta but into the American companies that can legal do whatever they please in the territory.

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

I meant territory. There’s no way they allow voting.

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

You would think that after the fiasco of Brexit Albertans would know better. Albertans would still be subject to their own governments damaging economic policies even if they could divorce from the federal ones. Most of their economic problems are self inflicted. That will only get worse. It is clear that their Premier and cabinet and advisors are already on the payroll of American billionaires. How any Albertan thinks that will make life or income better for them is astonishing. They harken back to some good ol days that never existed, while falling for Koch brothers (or whomever) marketing their takeover. They wouldn't become the next Alaska, they would become the next Puerto Rico, if that lucky. And like Quebec before them, they don't understand that the current provincial borders won't be the ones that would exist if they managed to secede.
Personally I'd be willing to work on a trade group: all the Albertans (and the few from BC, Sask, & Man) who want to secede could be swapped for an equal number of Americans who wanted to come North.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
215 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11998 readers
335 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS