683

Engineers are confident that shutting down the LECP will give Voyager 1 about a year of breathing room. They are using the time to finalize a more ambitious energy-saving fix for both Voyagers they call “the Big Bang,” which is designed to further extend Voyager operations. The idea is to swap out a group of powered devices all at once — hence the nickname — turning some things off and replacing them with lower-power alternatives to keep the spacecraft warm enough to continue gathering science data.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 133 points 1 month ago

What a badass little craft to have kept operating for so long. 🫡

[-] mystik@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago

Check out AMSAT-OSCAR 7 -- Closer to home, but launched in 1974, and still waking up when there's sun to operate. It's the oldest "operational" satellite still up there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMSAT-OSCAR_7

[-] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Fucking A good on ya for the heads up. I somehow haven't heard of this one.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

AMSAT = Amateur Satellite! Holy shit. Amateur, my ass.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

It’s a satellite for amateur radio, it’s not implying it’s an amateur satellite.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Cool that the Polish opposition used it to get around wire tapping.

[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 14 points 1 month ago

A truly beautiful piece of engineering

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 120 points 1 month ago

Why can't we be as forward thinking as the people who created the voyager probes?

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 121 points 1 month ago
[-] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Jesus that is a sobering figure I did not need to see today.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

And it’s quite outdated, I think from 2022. It has become much worse since

[-] Pyrodexter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It actually doesn't really show much, except maybe that inflation exists and people generally have more money now.

If it's supposed to show how the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer, it does a lousy job. It's practically impossible to see the relative change between the groups, since the lower two graphs' behaviors are impossible to see. The only thing that can at least somewhat be seen is that the top 10% and the top 1% grow quite correspondingly.

So, basically that graph shows that everything seems to be as fair as it has always been. Probably wasn't the intention, and certainly not a good representation of what's happening. It's very possible that the top 1% is included also in the top 10% and dominates it, but just based on that graph it's impossible to know.

[-] timestatic@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago

Now please show an inflation adjusted graph or better one that shows in percentage how much each fraction owns of the wealth pie.

[-] Skanky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

There is no way that disparity is that close.

[-] assa123@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The chart is at about 1.5% of the way from displaying a billionaire, with Muskrat being 800,000 times higher than the top of this chart. The 1% are not the problem, they are one in a hundred. The practically unbounded wealth of a handful of people above this chart is our problem, the world's problem, humanity's problem.

[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 51 points 1 month ago

Voyager 1 was launched in 1977 - just before the Reagan era. Coincidence?

Also, and I'm still just guessing here, it's probably the culmination of the space race to the moon minus the pressure to be there before the Russians.

In other words, NASA's Golden Age.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also, the tech was "just right" then. Small and frugal enough to fit on a probe but still robust enough to survive more than a few years in space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 month ago

It's not profitable

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 102 points 1 month ago

RTGs are subject to the issue of half-life - this is a consequence of that type of power source. Though, let’s be honest: we do not have any other sort of power generation technology that would be viable for literal decades on an interstellar space probe. And we definitely didn’t have a better alternative when they were launched.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 month ago

For roughly three milliseconds I thought to myself they shoulda used solar panels instead.

"Oh, wait...."

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 90 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

NASA's Voyager engineers are like the final evolution of your uncle that keeps his 1974 Chevy C/K running at 400,000 miles. It's the same autism across an ocean of resources.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

Actually basically yes. NASA has had decades of practice at minimum viable operation capability, making their spacecraft and rovers all but drag themselves along even when anything else would stop working.

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago
[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Only 49 years!

Enshitification.

Doesn't even run Outlook, let alone two. Pathetic.

[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

At least they got that part right. It runs Pine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago

This is so fuking cool

I am filled with pride that we collectively made something that will likely out live our sun, and we continue to find ingenious ways to keep it going and going

What a cool time to be alive

[-] nuachtan@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I remember when both Voyagers were making their fly bys. We'd get a bunch of images in magazines and stuff, and then wait several more years for the next planet. Between that and the Space Shuttle flights it was awesome.

I wasn't around for the moon landings so Skylab and Voyager were the highlights of my days.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

It's quite a feat of engineering to have something run this long - and without having physical access to it.

[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 24 points 1 month ago

Here are Images Voyager Took.

I have no idea how to sort them by recency; I'm guessing it's not sending such expensive data anymore, but what are the most recent (and furthest) images?

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

When is the next conjunction of planets that enabled the Voyager missions happening and are we preparing for it?

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

The Voyager mission launched in 1977. If I recall correctly, it takes roughly 80 years for the planets to realign for that purpose. If I didn't misremember, we're about halfway through waiting.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

1977....

Roughly 80 years

If I didn't misremember, we're about halfway through waiting.

A bit more than halfway, although sometimes I am shocked by how long ago 1977 was. Wasn't it just, like, 30 years ago or so?

It can't possibly be 49 years ago, can it?

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

2026 is to 1977 like 1977 is to 1928. 🫣

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

1985 is your birth year or where does that come in?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago
[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

The clock ran out years ago. They have been building bridges to New clocks for decades. But yes. Soon it will die, only propelled forward into nothingness and loneliness forever.

[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Only delusion separates us from the same

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago
[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 6 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the uplifting news!

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

One would think we should just ship it some upgraded parts on a door dash rocket, since we presumably have far better technology now.

No? No? Oh well I guess the USA is not that great then,

[-] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

The problem is that you're not just sending parts out there. You have to:

  • get the upgrade rocket going fast enough to actually catch up with something going very fast with a 20 year head start
  • slow down once you get to it.
  • make the upgrades while floating in space on a piece of hardware that was designed not to be upgraded and built on earth (hope you don't need gravity for disassembly) that you control on a 30 minute delay.

At that point we could just launch a whole new satellite with better hardware, going faster, and covering a completely different area of space. Which is what we have done. But we can still make use of the system we have out there. It's still the furthest out, so it's still worth using for as long as we can

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

We haven't sent anything away from the sun faster than Voyager 1. It's still the fastest.

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Isn't a major challenge of trying to surpass Voyager 1 that it had extremely good conditions for slingshotting off a lot of planets?

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, although we have ion thrusters now, so theoretically we could use something like that to get something going very fast over a long time. A little acceleration constantly over a long time goes a long way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] garbage_world@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This is just dumb

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
683 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84981 readers
2982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS