81

Blair’s mom had been cautious when she first brought her 6-year-old to the LGBTQ clinic at Cleveland’s MetroHealth hospital, “trying to figure out why he felt different inside,” as she puts it. She didn’t want to rush her child into treatment. So she was grateful to find the clinicians there took a slow and careful approach to Blair’s health care. Over the years they provided open-ended counseling, monitored his hormone levels and bone development, and only progressed with puberty blockers when it was clear that transitioning was making him happier and more confident. “That was my barometer for doing the right thing,” she tells me.

Today, at 16, Blair (a pseudonym to preserve his privacy) has been going to the clinic for a decade, and, by his mom’s account, thriving. Even when Ohio banned transgender medical treatments for minors in 2024, he could stay on his medication thanks to a grandfather clause in the law. But a few months ago, his mom got a message from MetroHealth alerting the family to a new threat.

On December 18, 2025, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. issued a declaration that rebranded transgender medical care as “sex-rejecting procedures” and claimed, erroneously, that the treatments “fail to meet professional recognized standards of health care” when given to minor patients. That same day, his agency proposed a pair of regulations that would curtail access nationwide. The first would forbid federal insurance programs that cover kids in low-income families from paying for puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and the surgery used in rare cases to treat gender dysphoria. The other would deliver an ultimatum to hospitals: Stop providing the treatments to trans kids, or else get kicked out of the federal Medicaid and Medicare programs.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Windsor Ontario is a not a long drive away from most places in Ohio. I would recommend Blair's mom start a relationship with doctors there for her child's continued health and well being with ongoing treatment.

I can't believe I'm recommending Americans leave the country to get better healthcare abroad in 2026.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

We Americans have been going abroad just for medical treatment for at least 20 years by this point. I remember seeing videos 10 years ago, talking about how much cheaper it is to fly to like Spain for a few weeks, have your procedure done (if it was a major surgery or something), hang out for a bit, then fly back; than it is to just have it done here in America.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

True, but that was for cost savings, not generally because it required doing so to get the life saving care not legal in the USA. The exception to this was in the years before Roe v Wade where Americans would "vacation aboard" to get a safe abortion.

[-] Carmakazi@piefed.social 15 points 2 weeks ago

If they aren't already arresting people at the border for doing this or being suspected of doing this, then it's coming, and soon.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

~~Arrested for seeking treatment for gender care? I'll need to see a citation on that. Lets not unnecessarily scare off people that need the treatment from seeking it here in this thread.~~

I misread your post. You weren't saying it is happening, but that it might soon.

I don't disagree it might happen soon. Until then, I want the folks that need this healthcare to be able to get it until more bold options are needed.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

ICE has previously set up checks at exit points, not just entry points. Make of that what you will

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I agree they have. I've been through them too and its scary to see what is becoming of our nation.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's absolutely the next step. They'll charge them with human trafficking for purposes of child abuse. Just watch.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm trans and moved from the US to Canada (and am still being fucked over by the US). AMA

[-] leoj@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Did you have an ancestor to help with Canadian citizenship, or are you actively pursuing that through a career path?

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I originally came on a work permit (then got promptly laid off 🫠) but 1/4 of my partner's ancestry is québécois so now we're taking that route.

[-] leoj@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

thanks for the info, unable to get there via work permits or ancestry, but would love to be a Canadian lol, one day maybe.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
81 points (100.0% liked)

News

37381 readers
1909 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS