175
submitted 2 weeks ago by 8oow3291d@feddit.dk to c/world@lemmy.world

President Trump on Wednesday said he is considering the formation of a “joint venture” with Iran to set up tolls in the Strait of Hormuz after the Trump administration and Tehran agreed to a two-week ceasefire deal.

[...]

The president also suggested Monday that the U.S. could impose its own tolls on vessels trying to transit through the channel. Leaders in Tehran signaled last week it would install a “toll booth” system to exert a price on ships seeking safe passage through the strait.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 89 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is insane. I don't know why this hasn't got wider news coverage.

I were not able to find a better news article, but this news article somehow failed to mention the central fact that anybody demanding tolls, whether Iran or USA or both, is unambiguously illegal under international law. It is an international strait, and there is right of navigation for ships. Legal Eagle describes why the tolls are illegal: Trump’s Illegalist War Gets Illegaler.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 29 points 2 weeks ago

It is an international strait, and there is right of navigation for ships.

Says who? May I introduce you to the wonderful world of gunboat diplomacy? /s

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 25 points 2 weeks ago

Says who?

The most extraordinary thing here is perhaps that the US is not saying so. With Trump talking about imposing tolls. It used to be that like the #1 priority of Pax Americana was to insure international freedom of navigation.

But Trump just casually throws that out the window, I assume in an unvetted 2AM Truth Social rant (I haven't actually checked where and when Trump said it).

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

How long though till Trump is the US, though?

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 23 points 2 weeks ago

Trump is President. Trump is the US right now. It is dangerous to pretend he is not.

And it is not just an aberration. Congress could remove Trump any time they wanted to. But they do not.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 2 weeks ago

Trump will be the US until he dies ( probably not for ages just to spite his haters)

[-] prole 20 points 2 weeks ago

is unambiguously illegal under international law.

Oh honey...

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 11 points 2 weeks ago

This specific part of international law has been almost universally observed for many decades. It actually matters.

[-] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

incoherent mumbling “~rules based order…~”

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 5 points 2 weeks ago

Who's going to enforce it? Not the USA.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

There are no laws, we made the whole thing up

[-] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well what will happen is that US courts will declare it illegal, but after attention spans have moved on, so the end result will be that Iran just wins in the end, and oil gets more expensive.

[-] realitista@lemmus.org 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah because the law is the one thing that can stop Trump, right? Let's stop kidding ourselves. The only thing proven to stop Trump is leverage and force. It doesn't even take that much because he's so stupid he can't usually figure out ways around it.

[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

The problem is that the US extorting protection money from merchant ships for passing in an otherwise free international waterway makes the US government look like a mafia state. Which it may very well be, although it tried to avoid making it this clear before.

[-] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's abundantly clear that the Trump administration is this and not an inch more than this.

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Everybody benefits from the free trade system working - and that depends on international freedom of navigation law being respected. Also Trump voting Republicans, and Republican Congressmen, benefit.

In a sane world, US voters would stop Trump. In their own rational self interest.

[-] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

None of Trump's voters are anywhere near understanding this though. They overwhelmingly vote against their own rational self interests time and time again. So a sane world is not the one we get.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago

It’s fully within the territorial waters of Iran or Oman. I’m not an international law expert but it seems that it’s a practiced convention not a legally enforceable rule.

Besides, international law is about who has the bigger stick.

[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

It’s fully within the territorial waters of Iran or Oman. I’m not an international law expert but it seems that it’s a practiced convention not a legally enforceable rule.

The right of "innocent passage" in a country's territorial waters is guaranteed by the UNCLOS. It's a legally binding rule since both Iran and the USA have signed the convention.

But both have probably also violated a dozen of international conventions since the start of the war, so that's mostly besides the point.

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 3 points 2 weeks ago

not a legally enforceable rule.

Anything is enforceable with enough bombs, if there is a will. Any previous US President, Democrat or Republican, would have enforced it no question.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

K? Are we supposed to look up to previous US presidents as authorities on international law?

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 2 weeks ago

as authorities

You can pick any authority you want. No reasonable person disagree on what international law says here.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Differences in degree are still differences.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 61 points 2 weeks ago

Lmao Trump sees an opportunity to swindle and is all over it. Art of the deal!

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hamberder meal!

[-] bajabound@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

You won't be saying that when your toll checks start coming in about 2 weeks from now! /s

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I know you are kidding, but if a monthly toll dividend payment went out to taxpayers even for a pittance, lots of folks would probably cheer the conquest happily.

[-] bamboo 5 points 2 weeks ago
[-] manxu@piefed.social 53 points 2 weeks ago

I know the man is just throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks, but the whiplash from "civilizational erasure" and "back to the Stone Ages" to "buddy-buddy halfsies on illegal tolls" is a little much.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

How brain is mush, and he started out with a bottom tier brain.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

But his uncle was a top scientist at Harvard! /s

[-] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Wants his cut.

[-] TotallynotJessica 16 points 2 weeks ago

The bigger irony of this is that a Trump actually doing this would further turn the world away from the US. If it was just Iran imposing the toll, over time the international community would sour on Iran for not moving past the war. This would economically benefit the US more than any direct cashflow from a toll ever would, as it would stabilize devestment from America. Now nobody will ever blame Iran for the toll, solidifying the loss in American soft power forever.

[-] Dremor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think it would be between the US and Iran, but rather a Trump-Iran joint venture. You know, to further compensate for his hard work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 weeks ago

“Joint venture” wherein the USA saves a few trillion dollars by standing down in Iran, and Iran tolls every ship that passes.

Art of the Deal.

[-] disorderly@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Gosh, I wonder what Iran thinks about that idea? The article has this to say:

Any “joint venture” was not part of Iran’s 10-point peace plan that the U.S. agreed to and the president previously called “workable.”

And that's it! Guess this one is still in the "concept of a plan" phase.

[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago

A carbon tax?! Demented Don the climate warrior!

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

Iran: "Nah."

[-] Zahtu@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

these was a guy in the comments 2-4 Weeks ago, who was already calling for that being the whole reason of the war. Trump and his lackeys are really executing the biggest grift in history. And the World only watches.

With Iran beging a close russian ally and the Trump administration the same (looking at Vance in Hungary), i dont think its too far fetched, that the whole pupeteer all along has been the Kremlin, achieving multiple goals at the same time. most importantly achieving financing for the continuation oft their Ukraine war.

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

here's a joint venture idea to Trump: your goal is to fuck off as much as you can with your buddy Israel, and Iran does the toll collecting. Iran get benefits from tolls, and you get benefits by stabilising gas prices over time.

[-] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

A collective "Fuck you, sit down and shut up" to Mr. Pedo would be nice.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 4 points 2 weeks ago

lol dumpy swindling? SAY IT ISN’T SO!

[-] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Imagine what you do is so criminal the USA wants to join in 😂😂😂

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

Is anyone else considering it?

[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Any random country with a navy coming to collect a toll like some sort of sequential highway robbery would be pretty funny.

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That is the question. The current world system depends on there not being these kinds of tolls. But if Trump legitimizes them, then world trade could be fucked.

The current system has worked so well for so long, people don't even seem to realize how much wealth it generates for everybody. And that it doesn't need to be this way. Actually not unlike what happens in the US, if the rule of law collapses completely.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

He would me more successful in trying to proclaiming reality into being if he said he was considering getting a pony.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON AROUND HERE? DID A SATIRE WRITER GET PROMOTED TO WRITING REAL LIFE? SOMEBODY MAKE LIKE SHE-HULK AND GO YELL AT THE PRODUCER OF THIS SHITSHOW REALITY!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
175 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55730 readers
1168 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS