776
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by tree@lemmy.zip to c/news@lemmy.world

After serving more than a month of in-school suspension over his dreadlocks, a Black student in Texas was told he will be removed from his high school and sent to a disciplinary alternative education program on Thursday.

Darryl George, 18, is a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu and has been suspended since Aug. 31. He will be sent to EPIC, an alternative school program, from Oct. 12 through Nov. 29 for “failure to comply” with multiple campus and classroom regulations, the principal said in a Wednesday letter provided to The Associated Press by the family.

Principal Lance Murphy wrote that George has repeatedly violated the district's “previously communicated standards of student conduct." The letter also says that George will be allowed to return to regular classroom instruction on Nov. 30 but will not be allowed to return to his high school's campus until then unless he's there to discuss his conduct with school administrators.

Barbers Hill Independent School District prohibits male students from having hair extending below the eyebrows, ear lobes or top of a T-shirt collar, according to the student handbook. Additionally, hair on all students must be clean, well-groomed, geometrical and not an unnatural color or variation. The school does not require uniforms.

George's mother, Darresha George, and the family's attorney deny the teenager's hairstyle violates the dress code. The family last month filed a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency and a federal civil rights lawsuit against the state’s governor and attorney general, alleging they failed to enforce a new law outlawing discrimination based on hairstyles.

The family alleges George's suspension and subsequent discipline violate the state’s CROWN Act, which took effect Sept. 1. The law, an acronym for “Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, dreadlocks, twists or Bantu knots.

A federal version passed in the U.S. House last year, but was not successful in the Senate.

The school district also filed a lawsuit in state district court asking a judge to clarify whether its dress code restrictions limiting student hair length for boys violates the CROWN Act. The lawsuit was filed in Chambers County, east of Houston.

George’s school previously clashed with two other Black male students over the dress code.

Barbers Hill officials told cousins De’Andre Arnold and Kaden Bradford they had to cut their dreadlocks in 2020. Their families sued the district in May 2020, and a federal judge later ruled the district’s hair policy was discriminatory. Their pending case helped spur Texas lawmakers to approve the state’s CROWN Act. Both students withdrew from the school, with Bradford returning after the judge’s ruling.

link: https://www.aol.com/news/black-student-suspended-over-hairstyle-220842177.html

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 248 points 1 year ago

Maybe try teaching the guy more, and caring about his hair less.

[-] crawley@lemmy.world 135 points 1 year ago

But that completely defeats the purpose! (which is the racism)

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 167 points 1 year ago

So... Where is the catalog of approved haircuts for students to pick from? Fucking fascist ideas being masked in bullshit like avoiding fake "distractions" in classrooms.

[-] lolola 35 points 1 year ago

I'd like to see a catalog of edge cases that would theoretically be up to code but still look outrageous.

[-] FraidyBear@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I'm sure we could get creative here. Like, you could go with the Friar Tuck look with the top part shaved and that would be fine. I guess it depends on what they consider "geometrical"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 133 points 1 year ago

Principal Lance Murphy is literally just going to die on this hill apparently. Between the massive cost the school district took because of the 2020 court loss over this exact same thing, and this giant L the school district is about to take for not only being now in Violation of Federal Law but also Texas literally passed a law, because of this asshat and the 2020 loss, indicating that he's not legally allowed to do exactly what he's doing.

The school district also filed a lawsuit in state district court asking a judge to clarify whether its dress code restrictions limiting student hair length for boys violates the CROWN Act

Which if you are unsure if your policy is violating a law or not, you should likely not have the policy until the court gives you more clarity. Because if the Courts do indeed indicate that the school is in violation of Texas' CROWN Act, they've just handed this kid millions of dollars in restitution, which I guess they can just pile on top of the millions this school district has blown so far on litigation.

You would think that at some point taxpayers would be up in arms, but nope it's Texas, blowing billions on stupid lawsuits is their thing.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

How does a previous case not automatically make the current situation unacceptable? Do they have to retry the exact same situation over and over again?

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 year ago

Because principal is a bully and willing to use his powers to destroy lives. The methods to protect people are very slow and so he gets away with it for years until the district loses a major lawsuit. Then he quietly gets reassigned or retires and we pretend the entire thing never happened.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

To be fair being racist has long been a winning strategy in Texas so you can imagine that their bag of tricks isn’t particularly deep in matters like this

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 113 points 1 year ago

So their guidelines are openly discriminatory at best, and openly racist otherwise...

It's mind-blowing how quickly the US is regressing because we're kowtowing to a miniscule minority.

I'm openly curious how well a "liberal" minded individual who isn't afraid to be an asshole would be received.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

Largely, the problem is that the far-right shows up.

No matter how tiny the power grab, they'll have someone there to grab it, often unopposed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] DreBeast@lemmy.world 109 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pure, unadulterated racism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

But I was told America is the land of the free. Have I been misinformed?

[-] Trabic@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

Whoever told you that is your enemy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DrMango@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

You're perfectly free to do things exactly as you're told. Capiche?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)

Fuck, dude, that is painfully racist of the school.

[-] detinu@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

They don't want to be communists and they're literally doing what the communists in my country used to do

[-] protist@mander.xyz 69 points 1 year ago

They are being authoritarian, likely your country was also under an authoritarian regime in the past based on what you're saying. Systems of economy are kinda separate

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flipht@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

They want to be authoritarians, whatever flavor they have to be to have power.

They don't want anyone else to have power over them.

So when they're in the out group, they'll ramp up the persecution narrative, and when they're in power, they'll ruthlessly repress everyone else.

All makes internal sense, if you're an asshole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 76 points 1 year ago

It's just hair. Why is the school district so interested in restricting hairstyles?

[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 year ago

It's not just hair though. It's the fact that a black student challenged a decision they've made.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Specifically, it seems the school was explicitly told to target a single student in order for opening a way for the Governor to challenge the CROWN act in courts. It's pure political maneuvering. Picking scapegoats and destroying individuals to advance racists agendas.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 year ago

Barbers Hill Independent School District prohibits male students from having hair extending below the eyebrows, ear lobes or top of a T-shirt collar, according to the student handbook. Additionally, hair on all students must be clean, well-groomed, geometrical and not an unnatural color or variation. The school does not require uniforms.

Land of the fucking free.

Call me when the HOA allows you to plant clover on the front lawn.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 year ago

I hope the family successfully destroys the finances of the people involved in these super racist decisions.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] febra@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

This is how america is destroying its youth and their future just because they refuse to comply with their racist demands. This is how the entire world sees america.

[-] dasgoat@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Especially non-white youth. These 'rules' are designed specifically as a bludgeon to use against poc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pascal@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago

I keep hearing America is the land of freedom and that Europe is way more racist than America.

This story would have never happened in Europe. Suspended because of a hairstyle, wtf.

[-] geogle@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

This is a newsworthy isolated incident. It's newsworthy because of the ridiculous stance of the principal.

Can we talk about France's stance on hijabs in school?

[-] canuckkat@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Not isolated at all. Black kids (especially girls) get targeted all the time. It's usually ignored or doesn't make the news.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Can we talk about France’s stance on hijabs in school?

lmao, what?

ANY religious clothing is banned in France. This isn't Discriminatory, as it applies to Christians, Buddhists, Hindus etc just as it does to Muslims.

Maybe actually inform yourself before you start with whataboutism?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 64 points 1 year ago

What a shithole.

Hope he gets into a college as far away as possible.

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 61 points 1 year ago

It's baffling to me, that the US always claims to be the champion of freedom, but runs most of their education like part-time prison camps. My school here in Germany didn't give a crap about anyone's appearance. If you're street legal, you're fine in school.

[-] MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Well, it’s because they have to prepare us for prison as an adult. Wait until you find out that American schools are largely funded by property taxes. Which means rich neighborhoods that pay more in property taxes have generally way better schools than poor neighborhoods.

The United States is like a villain from a scooby doo episode. In every episode the “monster” is a person of color, or illegal immigrant, or an LGBTQ person. But when they catch the “monster” and pull its mask off. It’s old man US government every god damn time.

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Imagine being sent to the school with all the unruly and undisciplined kids because of your hairstyle. Crazy and so fucking racist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ThatFembyWho 50 points 1 year ago

"Failure to comply"

There it is, that's the entire purpose of the modern education system, to beat us into submission to arbitrary socioeconomic roles, to curtail independence and creativity, rendering us fodder for corporate masters. Mind all the rules and maybe tomorrow you'll get the extra nice table scraps.

Good for them not complying, they literally harmed nobody including themselves. The suspension is clearly a punitive measure to heal the administration's wounded pride, which is also an essential aspect of the education system.

[-] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 45 points 1 year ago

Why did the student just not simply turn into a white kid with non-threatening, non-geometric hair?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago
[-] crypticthree@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Here's the weird part. The Texas State Legislature JUST passed a law making this kind of discrimination illegal. I don't know what this school is doing. It's like they want to pay lawyers

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ironic of this story to come out of a place called "Barbers" highschool. They take their haircuts pretty damn seriously up on that hill.

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Darryl George, 18, is a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu and has been suspended since Aug. 31.

The man is 18. You can't make him do anything he doesn't want to do. He should just take his GED.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tjsauce@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

WTF is geometric hair, or rather, how does one have non-geometric hair? What, does it have to remain euclidean? It seems so arbitrary and pointless

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] halferect@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Time for the students to protest by having hair that isn't "acceptable." I imagine suspending most of the students won't go over well

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Barbers hill, and they're picking on a dude's hair.

[-] fl42v@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

Why tf they even care about students' hairstyles? Tbh, looks like whoever came up with this brilliant rule is a bolding and jealous fossil :::|

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ban blonde straight hair and watch the racists squirm.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

Can't imagine my school making international news, especially with something as pathetic. It reads like a bad Onion article. Barber High having a strict hair code? WTF. And this story goes for months, and it's not the first time, and it's real. How? Everything screams stupid fiction there, and yet that's what happens in a small town in Texas. Idk if they did that out of racism or boredom, but come on, I read about this comical idiocy from the opposite side of the globe. I can't imagine what's going through the mind of this school's admin.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

I really cannot stand this shit, I remember back in school we had to have approved hairstyles and uniform rules, it was all bs to me. None of that really had any corelation to how good a student was.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
776 points (100.0% liked)

News

23387 readers
1994 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS