564
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 246 points 1 week ago
[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 64 points 1 week ago

can no longer say Linux is free

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 209 points 1 week ago

Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting. The article literally says, that it's "an honest bump" to allow typical usage like web browsing and multitasking.

Ubuntu experts at OMG Ubuntu characterize the latest revision in RAM specs as “an honesty bump.” In other words, the core OS isn’t really more demanding on system resources this time around, but Canonical recognizes that with the latest Gnome desktop, modern web browsers, and typical multitasking workflows, users should look at a minimum of 6GB of RAM.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 94 points 1 week ago

Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting.

NEVER!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago

But that requires actually READING 😖 /j

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Web browsing is the real murder here.. and i dont want to know how much memory is solely spent on ads

[-] grinde@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

The week after GDPR went into effect was amazing. Almost nobody was ready, so they just turned off all their ads and tracking for European IPs while they figured it out. Pages loaded pretty much instantly.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

I'm concerned about in-system bloat because I read the linked article.

Rather, it’s more of an honesty bump. Components that make up the distro – the GNOME desktop and extensions, modern web browsers (and the sites we load in them) and the kinds of apps we use (and keep running) whilst multitasking are more demanding.

The desktop itself isn't the only reason that you need more RAM, but it's definitely one of them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago

They’re raising it because of RAM needs of browsers and GNOME.

If you’re a shell nerd like me, you’ll still be fine running it on a potato.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's an illuminating experience to go to a store with Apple computers with 8GB of RAM on display, and browse to a RAM-heavy unoptimized website like YouTube or even Reddit now.

Open a few tabs.
Open a dozen.
You'd be surprised what a decently coded OS can pull off without compromising on the visuals.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] jeffep@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago

Great move in these times where RAM is cheap and widely available

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

Canonical has never been accused of being able to read the room.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 week ago

I don't immediately hate it. It's been a while since any laptops/prebuilds shipped with less than 8 GB, and there's distros out there far better suited to running on low power or legacy hardware.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"HERE'S A NICKLE, KID. GET YOURSELF A BETTER COMPUTER."

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

20 years ago when Scott Adams was still a moderately sane human.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub 23 points 1 week ago
[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 week ago

Wow those min specs are pure bullshit. Sure you can run the OS - oh, did you want to do anything else with your PC? Good luck

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 21 points 1 week ago

Me with 16 GB on my computer

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 21 points 1 week ago

That's pretty much what a browser needs these days.

[-] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 14 points 1 week ago

Reject modernity. Embrace lynx browser from terminal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] T156@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

This doesn't seem so bad, though. 2 GB more in about 10 years is pretty reasonable in terms of an increase.

It's not like they doubled it.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago

no it is not reasonable. What the hell do they need an extra 2gb for? What the hell is the operating system taking up that much resources for?

My first pc needed 4MiB of ram for the os. Why does this need 1536x as much to provide.... not much else tbh?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bold_omi@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago

Use Debian if you want a system like Ubuntu that isn't full of Canonical's corporate shit. Ubuntu is based on Debian.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 week ago

Fun thing, I just booted up an old computer. Started right up. It had Ubuntu 11.10 on it.

Now, I obviously didn't connect the thing to the Internet. Updates would have probably failed hard. Not because it's missing over a decade of updates so there might be some complications on that front, but because it's a Pentium III with Definitely Not Even a Gigabyte of memory. (Oh and a Nvidia GeForce 2 MX. I'm pretty sure that's not supported by... any driver any more.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] moxymarauder@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 week ago

I wonder how much of this is just modern web apps... even running without a containerized distro and a leaner DE - I still have +90% of my RAM taken up by websites.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Modern UI development is such fucking shit. I have no idea why they went with all of these heavyweight shit frameworks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Ubuntu is the Windows 11 of Linux distros.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago

Shocked i got this far without someone blaming snaps

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elbiter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
  1. Everything is a framework under a framework running on a pseudo virtual machine. 6 GB are just for the notepad and the mouse driver.
[-] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

8GB was barely enough 10 years ago. That's when I switched to Arch+KDE. Then KDE started using more. memory.

[-] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 week ago

More memory meaning? From 800Mb to 1GB? I'd say, for what plasma is, its ram usage is low.

[-] moxymarauder@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 week ago

agreed. KDE is pretty much the gold standard of the usability versus resource usage tradeoff, IMHO. From what I've seen: Websites/Web Browsers = worst offenders.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] northernlights@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Meanwhile on my raspberrypi 4 running Ubuntu server:

screenshot showing 800M RAM usage

And my tablet running stock Ubuntu:

screenshot showing 2.3G RAM usage

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 9 points 1 week ago

In post PC ownership cyberpunk dystopia well all be running slack

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kamen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Regardless of the OS, if you're using the computer for anything productive, the application software, not the OS, will eat the majority of the RAM anyway. If you're looking at the minimum requirements, chances are you're not looking to do anything besides browsing the web with 5 tabs open.

It sucks though, I agree - software should get more efficient over time, just like hardware does. Out of curiosity, do we have anything more specific, i.e. how they tested that, what apps were running and so on? Or maybe they now deem that more things should be running?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
564 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

83726 readers
2477 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS