638
Aged like milk (lemmy.ml)
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 months ago

Capitalism cannot allow good. Good is not profitable. We must extract, squeeze, enshittify until the very end.

[-] bilbaobun@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I’d argue ddg is good and they area product of capatalism. Nobody is forcing you to use google

[-] JamonBear@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

DDG is just Bing in disguise. It's nowhere near as good as google used to be back in last century.

[-] bilbaobun@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I use it and I have no problems at all. Would say it’s on the same level, but the ai searches are actual relevant and tasteful unlike google

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Anyone using ai searches is automatically un trustable to me. Ive never once needed it and ive corrected many stupid people asking ai things and suddenly thinking they are smart on a subject that I'm actually knowledgeable in because I actually read and use my brain.

Kagi is maybe one aspect of capitalism that works. I pay, I get good product. I know it has a couple bad things (possible Russian ties) but yeah

[-] anothermember@feddit.uk 37 points 2 months ago

I still remember when Google launched, the uncluttered homepage was the real differentiator, other search engines, especially AltaVista, were just as good at the time, but they would load their homepage with as much extra stuff as they could think of to attract people. Then Google came along with a quirky name (for the time) and a uniquely minimalist look that broke all the established rules, it wasn't necessarily better search at that point but it really looked different. Different times of course, a search engine was just another website, no different to your own personal page.

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As far as I remember Alta Vista was ok at the beginning, but soon people figured out that you can get to the top result if you just repeat your top keywords multiple times in the meta Keywords tag. Another trick was to just add "free, mp3, sex" to each pages meta keywords to get more traffic. At this point Google was better, and also would load much faster on dialup than the image heavy sites like yahoo or Alta Vista.

[-] toynbee@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago

So where do I go for my free mp3 sex now?

[-] SanicHegehog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I liked dogpile back in the late 90s because it would aggregate from several sources and wasn't terribly cluttered comparatively. I think I swapped to Google around 2000ish because it was so minimalist.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 months ago

If google were just a search engine still, there wouldn't be a problem. But they are much much more now. Plus they suck at doing the thing they were supposed to do, i.e. searching.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 18 points 2 months ago

I read something that said they are PURPOSELY bad at search now because if users have to click multiple pages, they see more ads. Like, how evil do you have to be to purposely corrupt your main thing just to sell more ads.

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago

Well the main thing for them now is to sell more ads...

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

Search never made them money. Ads do. Ads are their thing.

We need to figure out a way to host content on the web that is just part of the network, without needing servers or big tech companies.

It’s not really possible I know but we need to anyway.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 2 months ago

Yup, I know. They are, first and foremost, an advertising company. If they can integrate advertising into their products, you can bet money on them doing so. Which is all the reason i need to never use google again.

[-] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

I2P. You can host a simple web page on your own router, only accessible to other I2P users. We could bring back web rings.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 12 points 2 months ago

It's all about market capture, then anything they want.

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

The 2007 acquisition of Doubleclick is the watershed moment that converted Google from a competitor into a monopoly of the Internet ecosystem.

[-] Azrael@reddthat.com 8 points 2 months ago

Well that aged like milk. Google is primarily an advertising company now.

[-] Lanske@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

When it was cool to google....

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Eh, their home page is still very clean, as described in the picture.

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
638 points (100.0% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

16903 readers
28 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS