Note that the person criticising the original is also not active in organising a general strike. It is permissable to hold opinions without being obliged to act on them.
Yes. But the moment you release your opinion out on the wild, we're allowed to ridicule you for them.
Of course you can. I'm just saying that the criticism is stupid in this case. I mean, I think that fusion power would be a good thing, but fuck me for not working 24 hours a day on a PhD in nuclear physics.
But that's more like having people talk about how we should do nuclear and renewable power, and you coming along complaining people should be working on developing fusion power instead because fission power just won't do anything
Not it isn't.
Arguing that fission power won't do anything is objectively incorrect.
Arguing that a general strike would be more effective than weekend rallies alone is objectively correct.
Your analogy is not analagous.
Beyond that, arguing against doing something is not the same as arguing for doing something else, in addition to /or/ instead of the original something.
That is true, however this is not about the acting, it's about hypocrisy in the traditional sense. OC is essentially saying "we have the same goal and I set an easier plan and I'm currently following it, while you are criticizing my plan, making up a way harder one, saying I should follow that one while not following either mine or your plan at all."
It's like when you are working in a supermarket, restocking the shelves and your coworker is just sitting on a chair watching you, and after a while he says "this is useless, you should rather do some cashier work, people are waiting" while eating candy.
Yeah sure he might be technically right, but this is extremely out of line.
Why should I listen to you? You're not actively involved in organizing a general strike either.
You've opened this Pandora's Box my friend there's no closing it again now. It's not being actively involved in organizing a general strike all the way down.
Yea I’m really bad at organizing but I damn well know it has to be done by someone with the skill to do it.
Could be a person not living in the USA, Max.
Us foreigners also have opinions on what's happening in the US, because it affects us too, but we have no way to affect change in the US, other than our boycotts.
IDK Russia did a good job swaying the US public opinion and spreading propaganda.
I was gonna say I bet a lot of the accounts complaining about these protests are Russian bots
Remember, if your organization is big enough to organize a general strike, the feds are there and watching. Watch your back
recall that the FBI infiltrated the civil rights movement and more even before we had a police state empowered by the Patriot Act surveillance and AI data collection.
I have zero proof, but I suspect that they are actively disrupting all attempts at organization. This is based on the history of CIA and FBI; we never know what they are doing currently, we only know a tiny bit of what they have done in the past.
Maybe I'm paranoid.
Protests aren't the solution on their own, they're a step in the process of people getting to the point of doing something about the situation they've found themselves in. You can't fix a problem if you don't first acknowledge and accept that it's a problem. Stop crapping on people for protesting. Instead, encourage them to use that energy to take things further. And if you know so much about what will actually work and are going out of your way to tell people what they're doing isn't going to work, maybe you should be doing the thing you claim will work so you can lead by example instead of armchair directing.
A term I've been using is 'activation'. people who are in the early stages of activation attend protests - more often attendance is more activation. This eventually evolves into active participation in support networks, vigilante counteraction, or legal resistance like journalism and similar activities.
Protest attendance is the start of most individuals' activation, and we can't knock that starting place if we want greater numbers participating in the counteraction apparatus going forward.
Yeh the other step is actual violence. Not condoning or promoting it.
Just saying that has to be the next follow up if they're not listening to he protests.
The No Kings Marches are just a prelude. Imagine all those millions of people participation in the upcoming general strike . Then imagine those millions turning to violence. Imagine them armed.
Just a suggestion, but becoming armed before becoming violent might be a better order of progression.
LOL what country do you think this is? "Becoming armed"? Bro this is America.
except the ones who have traditionally fought against the right to bear arms is the same people protesting. they need to be armed, and they need to protest with their arms, same reason a government will parade with their weapons
The first comment / response or whatever that I read in there does a better job of expressing my opinion on this than I ever could.
"It's building the muscle. You have to get someone to show up one day before you can get them to show up often, or every day, or for the long haul."
Really the same goes for so many of the organizations running the events. They're local orgs, local people with different levels of experience (mostly very little) with organizing at this scale. It takes practice and time to get good at these things. It takes time to find volunteers and train them.
Contrary to what some of the comments implied, most of these events aren't planned/operated by paid professionals, not that paying for professional help is inherently a bad thing anyway. There's top-level guidance and coordination, that kind of stuff generally requires dedicated teams (aka paid employees) due to the time and skill requirements for those roles. But on the local level, it's volunteers all around. And the real planning, the hard work, is virtually all done locally by those volunteers.
Your wallet is your strongest voice in the eyes of this administration. Think carefully about where you spend your hard earned money.
A single day of avoiding Walmart and Amazon is not meaningful if you give them your money tomorrow. Find local businesses that deserve your money and spend your money with them instead.
Buy less and buy better quality items that last longer. Reduce consumerism and give homemade gifts or experiences instead of more junk nobody needs. Use lending libraries, swap groups, and other methods to reduce your contribution to the economy, which is frankly the only thing the American government really is interested in.
And hats off to the person who successfully organizes a general strike. I’m cheering you on from Canada.
This is a pretty valid thing to say in the US.
Too many people think that just protesting is enough for any change they want to be effected. We don't get taught about things like labor struggles.
Oh yeah, lets argue amongst ourselves. That always works.
This person could be French. They know how to bring the state to heel, and they share their experiences for those clearly in need of learning Americans. But they have to leave organizing to the people who are actually involved.
I don't know why people have this illusion surrounding French people when they're actively electing fascists and calling antifa a violent group of terrorists, while having their government give a minute of silence for the death of an actual nazi (like, actually posting on twitter that he loves Hitler -kind of nazi)
French people know nothing, they stopped understanding protests and revolts after Napoleon started shooting civilians with cannons and have been licking the boots of dictators since then. It's no wonder that a bunch of them collaborated with the nazis back in ww2, and it's no wonder they're collaborating with the new nazis now.
I agree people (Americans?) are idealizing the french in this regard. But you're yourself misinformed.
Napoleon did shoot royalists with cannons in 1795, when he wasn't yet in power. It didn't stop the 1830 or 1848 revolutions happening, nor the 1871 commune. More recently the 1968 protests were accompanied by a general strike which did scare the hell of many people.
What we need is a pragmatic and informed assessments of events so that we can decide what might work and what won't. National stereotypes and prejudices should be discarded.
no kings has no leverage and no power and no stamina and no guts. are the police attacking them in the streets? i personaly see these kind of protests as controlled off gassing. you have a large amount of people who would under other circumstances be pushed into actual action, thinking they make a difference doing this, allowing the system to functionally ignore them.
without the media on your side these protests do not work. and the media is captured, and neither side wants to see this stop
And are you actively organizing to change that? Or are you just providing an example of OP?
Just because the poster doesn't take action, doesn't mean they are wrong.
I'm not going to be first in line to start doing something that actually fucking matters, but you bet your ass I'll be third.
Why is it always a general strike? Why not a rent/mortgage strike?
Hes right though.
Yeah that's the pot calling the kettle black. Infighting between groups who manage to effect 0 change.
I thought a general strike was in the works for May 1st?
One-day strikes are the same as one-day protests. Good visibility and networking but no actual pressure on their own. Ideally a general atrike would be "indefinite until our demands are met" but the US doesn't have enough class unity or social safety net for that right now.
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
