19

We often see technology from the future brought back to the present, whether as a case of a chance encounter, or something more.

However, it’s also fairly uncommon to see those technologies pop up against after they’ve been introduced. One such example is the ablative armour generators that Admiral Janeway fitted to the Voyager, being prototypes from a future Starfleet, which are seen in that episode, and then never again, even in shows that are set after the time she left.

The reason for this might be that the Federation does not want to run the risk of being accused of violating the temporal prime directive (or accidentally running afoul of it in some other way), and shelves that particular technology entirely.

From their standpoint, it would be rather difficult to separate a technology that the Federation developed of their own accord, compared to one that they might have developed from being inspired by, or reverse-engineering a piece of future technology, so they shelve it, rather than risk the trouble, never developing the preliminary steps to reach that future technology.

The only anachronistic part of this is the Doctor’s mobile emitter, which is a variant of 26th century technology, and was developed into Picard, but that can be explained by it being reverse engineered from 26th century technology, by someone in the 20th century, technically making it technology from the past. Since it is Earth technology from their own past, they might be able to get away with iterating on their own version without risking trouble with the various temporal enforcement agencies.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vegivamp@feddit.nl 8 points 2 years ago

That seems unlikely. If starfleet warehouses the future tech (which, itself, seems like a likely scenario for the reasons outlined here), then near future research would not have access to it, or reverb know about it. Therefore there is no reason that the development of the precursor technologies should be prevented or prohibited.

Don't forget that precursor technology often looks nothing like what eventually comes from it - it is often not even in the same ballpark. No-stick cookware was developed from space shuttle heat shielding...

[-] Froyn@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Radar was initially designed for aircraft detection. Not long after saw the "Radar Range" enter the market. This familiar technology is called the Microwave.

[-] LibraryLass@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

And all because some poor schmuck at an early radio lab had a candy bar in their pocket that got melted.

[-] Froyn@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

South Park has ruined so many things for me. The Radar story makes me think of Randy Marsh; "Just gonna get a little cancer Stan... Don't tell your mom."

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

That's why we still don't have transparent aluminum.

[-] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Sure we do, it's in expensive watchfaces and a few phone screens.

[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

On the other hand, such innovations coming "free" to society in fact frees up theorists, researchers, scientists, engineers, etc. to work on other innovations that they might not have time/resources to pursue.

[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Most of Admiral Janeway's goodies are tucked away at Daystrom as a "break glass" last-resort. You don't show your hand to your enemies unless you have to.

"But the Borg have already–" Sure. But the ~~Romulans~~ ~~Klingons~~ Breen...? have not.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Daystrom Institute

3470 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to Daystrom Institute!

Serious, in-depth discussion about Star Trek from both in-universe and real world perspectives.

Read more about how to comment at Daystrom.

Rules

1. Explain your reasoning

All threads and comments submitted to the Daystrom Institute must contain an explanation of the reasoning put forth.

2. No whinging, jokes, memes, and other shallow content.

This entire community has a “serious tag” on it. Shitposts are encouraged in Risa.

3. Be diplomatic.

Participate in a courteous, objective, and open-minded fashion. Be nice to other posters and the people who make Star Trek. Disagree respectfully and don’t gatekeep.

4. Assume good faith.

Assume good faith. Give other posters the benefit of the doubt, but report them if you genuinely believe they are trolling. Don’t whine about “politics.”

5. Tag spoilers.

Historically Daystrom has not had a spoiler policy, so you may encounter untagged spoilers here. Ultimately, avoiding online discussion until you are caught up is the only certain way to avoid spoilers.

6. Stay on-topic.

Threads must discuss Star Trek. Comments must discuss the topic raised in the original post.

Episode Guides

The /r/DaystromInstitute wiki held a number of popular Star Trek watch guides. We have rehosted them here:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS