305

The State Department has slashed by about 80% the fee for Americans to formally renounce their U.S. citizenship.

After years of legal battles with several groups representing Americans wanting to give up their citizenship, the department on Friday published a final rule in the Federal Register that reduces the cost from $2,350 to $450.

The new fee, which took effect on Friday, had been promised in 2023 but had never been implemented. The cost is now the same as it was when the State Department first started charging Americans to formally renounce their citizenship in 2010.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Rubio slashes the percentage of fit in his shoes by 40%

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago

There's a fee for that??? How about a double 🖕🖕as your fee, how's that? If I renounce citizenship, it's because I am fucking tired of it all and see the country as completely unredeemable-- aka hate. I ain't paying you shit.

[-] KumaLumaJuma@feddit.uk 7 points 23 hours ago

And your name is published on a public list of people that have given up their citizenship.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

You're also freed from taxation but citizenship, which only the American citizenship comes with. If you're leaving the country and going to another where you attained citizenship and don't want your foreign income taxed by the US (beyond exclusions) and be arrested for tax evasion when you visit, then that's something you may look at.

[-] KumaLumaJuma@feddit.uk 9 points 14 hours ago

Don’t disagree, ironic the US started largely as a protest about taxation without representation and now the US has become one of only two countries to tax their overseas citizens.

Not to mention the situations with Puerto Rico, Washington D.C and other territories (like Guam and the US Virgin Islands) who are also taxed but do not have representation.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 16 hours ago

taxation but citizenship

Did you mean "by"?

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 13 points 22 hours ago

Good. The value of being an American is in a death spiral.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

There's a strong political bias on who would renounce their citizenship and they don't want those people voting.

[-] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 13 points 23 hours ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

I recently learned you can still get your social security benefits even when you’re not a citizen.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Can we perhaps trade citizenship with a Canadian Trump supporter?

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago

too bad only RICH canadian ones would do that.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

There’s some rabidly pro Trump Canadian’s out there

[-] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 139 points 1 day ago

For any dual citizenship person, or someone who happens to have been born there, and living outside the US, that sounds like a great deal. And no longer having to deal with US tax every year. It's the only country who taxes you as a citizen living outside the country - for a country founded on their abhorrence to "taxation without representation", they sure do a lot of it.

[-] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 73 points 1 day ago

Come on, someone has to make up for the taxes the corporations aren't paying

[-] hector@lemmy.today 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Income taxes were unheard of in the revolution too. The feds weren't in everyone's business, by design. Just tariffs and duties and such for money. In the civil war they started income taxes, then cancelled them after the war. The restarted them in wwi, and kept them since.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 12 points 1 day ago

Income taxes were supposed to be temporary when they were implemented.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's no limit to temporary. I'm sure they'll drop it soon!

[-] parsizzle@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

According to leading astronomers, the sun is temporary too

[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago

Projection. The most represented class is the most undertaxed - the wealthy and the corpos

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

Eh, it's not the only country. There's one other.

[-] jif@piefed.ca 9 points 1 day ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

It's almost like they have the perfect confluence of things to encourage brain drain:

  1. Put idiots like Bobby Brainworm in charge of health so they can do battle with proven science.

  2. Cut funding of science way, way down. I mean really, letting a complete poseur idiot like fElon decide things like that? WTAF.

  3. Unleash regressive dumbasses to do their worst xenophobic bullshit.

Seriously, someone needs to demonstrate how everything Donvict's crime wave is doing to this country is not a wishlist of the likes of Russia.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 22 hours ago
  1. slash education all across the board which benefits both parties at least the old guard "dinos", plus increasing propaganda of anti-intellectualism
[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Which is the equivalence of its cool to be stupid like the President. Which is sad and pathetic.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

The fact that PEDOnald made it into office is a nearly-perfect example of Worthington's Law.

I cannot tell you how many times someone would say, as a way of giving up, "well, he has more money than you". Which is not really the flex they think it is, but that's how broken brains work. That's when they aren't saying his critics don't just have "TDS"

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago

It's like they're daring me at this point.

I don't want to leave this country. I was born here, my dad was born here, my dad's dad was born here, etc. But, holy shit, this society is failing. It's not failed, yet, but it is failing. I want to believe that things can turn around, but it gets harder everyday to hold onto that belief.

It's especially hard because I feel like my proposals for how things could be fixed are actively, aggressively being fought against by many of my countrymen. Hell, we can't even agree on the problems, let alone solutions. For a lot of Americans, there is no problem! This is all hunky-dory.

A nation is a shared idea. A nation exists when a group of people all agree that they are a nation. I ain't in the same nation as these folks. They've got their idea of America and I've got mine, and they are two different things. I'm not a part of the shared idea anymore. It's moved away from me. It's become something that I don't understand or agree with. I don't think it's moral or rational, or sustainable.

Frankly, I think the idea of America as a nation, as it stands right now, is doomed to fail. It's far too tolerant of greed, ignorance and liars with malicious intent. A society like that won't last. It will collapse.

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago

When was the last time a country actually collapsed? You’ve got Yugoslavia, Cambodia, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, and the USSR. Forgoing the USSR, you don’t see many countries of this size doing the whole “collapse” thing, these days. I think it’s far more likely that worst case scenario tends toward reshaping American culture toward more toxicity, corruption, … other nations will slowly stop relying on the US for its economic reliability, stable bonds, … you’ll have less sway over international politics. Locally, your markets will lose the vigor provided when an economy yields fair chance to make gains. People who rise to power in your new nation will be those who pay or promise the most to a small handful of elitists. National response to disasters will become dull. People will be radicalized, but also less educated. Public violence will increase. All of this will happen while your foreign state enemies watch and fill the void you’ve left. You’ll never get that position back… just as Rome didn’t. Just as Spain didn’t. Just as the UK didn’t. You’ll be a nation that just fades to the sidelines. Still relevant in some ways, but definitely not anything like you used to be.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The USSR is definitely the nearest analog. That was, what, 35 years ago. That's very recent, in civilizational terms. A little over 100 years ago, in the early 20th century, several large, powerful empires collapsed. That's relatively recent, all things considered.

Maybe it doesn't seem to happen as much today because in the aftermath of all of those empires collapsing, new, more resilient nation states were formed, with more sustainable social, cultural and political systems. But the US is much older than all of them. The oldest democracy still going. Also by far the oldest federated, presidential republic. It's hard to really compare the resiliency of a country like ours to, say, a much more recently formed parliamentary democracy, especially when most of those nations are much smaller than us by population, and are usually significantly less geographically and ethically diverse.

[-] Klox@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

It's frustrating living in a state that is pursuing good values, and then we vote federally and lose to morons. What can I do? Move to these shitholes? There's a lot of possible improvements to the system, but we need to cross a threshold to get over to get that done and IDK if we can. I have young kids and grapple with uprooting them. The next couple of years will be very telling.

[-] JaymesRS@piefed.world 16 points 1 day ago

{Awkwardly laughs in Minnesotan.}

NGL, I have thought far more frequently lately to move to Canada or see if Canada will adopt the whole state.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

Sort of. If you are smart enough to leave, that's one less voter they have to deal with.

There's also a whole other slew of issues that affect Accidental Americans usually having to do with non-filed taxes, meaning the whole process also recoups from global earnings that have had zilch to do with the US through tax traps. Making it easier to apply for means they can get a few bucks more, and I suspect the people processing those requests are at the ICE level of quality. William Barr's daughter, Mary Barr Daly, ended up being placed as a senior adviser to FinCEN, which is closely involved in this process, and she has her own history of exercising her position in let's just say the traditional Republican manner.

To be fair, both parties have been at fault for the US' Eritrean system of citizenship, neither really cares, although I suspect with how many bridges they are burning they are seeing the writing on the wall and would rather get something from the people trying to leave "the right way" while their demands on the global banking system are still respected.

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Nice. As an American living in Spain, this will be nice when the time comes. Now, if I could only speed up my citizenship here so I can file sooner.

[-] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 14 points 1 day ago

If you were born in the USA, still live here, have no other citizenship and drop the $450 to renounce - what happens?

[-] bluepop@anarchist.nexus 2 points 17 hours ago
[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Part of the requirement for renouncing is (or at least should be) that you have established citizenship somewhere else. Otherwise you would be considered stateless, which causes all kinds of problems. Everything from being unable to access government benefits, to not being able to get an ID.

I say “should be” because the US is one of the few attending countries that refused to sign the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness

[-] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

refused to sign

As an aside, it is this annoying thing with American exceptionalism in regards to certain issues that makes it anathema to the concept of a United Nations, despite it being a founding member-nation.

[-] Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

I don't think you can, there are some conventions around this. https://www.unhcr.org/what-we-do/protect-human-rights/ending-statelessness/un-conventions-statelessness

So unless you have a second one the conventions prevent them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] hector@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago

Off subject a bit, but I just heard Rubio lied about his shoe size to the president that's been handing out free shoes everyone feels compelled to wear, and that he's been wearing those oversized shoes because he was too vain to be honest.

Fuck you Rubio.

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

What I read was that Trump has been guessing the shoe sizes and people don't want to correct him.

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Looks like it really might have vanity for Rubio:

As Vice President J.D. Vance recalled at an event in December, the Journal reported, he was meeting with Trump, Rubio, and an unnamed third politician in the Oval Office when the president accused Vance and Rubio of having “shitty shoes.” Trump asked them all for their shoe size; Vance made sure to put in the record that he’s a size 13, while Rubio claimed to be an 11 and the third man a 7. The president then launched a sideways insult at the guy with the daintiest feet: “You know you can tell a lot about a man by his shoe size.”

That the “locker-room talk” president would place an inordinate, genital-related premium on a man’s foot size was surely no surprise to Rubio, who has risen in GOP influence in direct proportion to his willingness to contort himself to Trump’s exact desires. It does not seem out of the realm of possibility, then, that Rubio would inflate his own shoe specs to impress Trump with his masculine bulk.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Tempting, though I'd rather they do the work for me

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~pass~~ did not read that properly seems like a deal for Americans

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
305 points (100.0% liked)

News

36557 readers
1984 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS