1595
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dadifer@lemmy.world 121 points 1 month ago

Who owns ActivityPub? No one.

[-] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 88 points 1 month ago
[-] lime@feddit.nu 73 points 1 month ago
[-] 0ops@piefed.zip 24 points 1 month ago

You own it too, motherfucker!

[-] albbi@piefed.ca 28 points 1 month ago

Ah the ol' lemmy switcheroo.

[-] riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

grab my self hosted server, I'm going in!

...

(...someone give me another instance of this joke to link to.)

[-] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 1 month ago

ah shit

*runs away*

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stinerman@feddit.online 33 points 1 month ago

Not trying to be that guy, but ActivityPub is technically owned by the W3C. I agree with the sentiment of your post regarding the free nature of AP.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Atropos@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

You're right! This just reeks of Big ActivityPub propaganda!

[-] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 month ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago
[-] StraponStratos@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago

Luigi the rich in the streets, the boardrooms, the vacation towns, their homes, or anywhere else.

[-] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 50 points 1 month ago

And if people were to try to topple the oligarchy, Dems would toss them under the bus.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, oligarchs are bad. How is this controversial to you?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

They are, at the very least, incompetent-bad.

Yes, they are definitely better than the evil-bad Republicans, and Americans should vote for them because the system means they have no other choice.

But there is criticism to be had against them, too.

[-] parlaptie@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

They're not incompetent. They serve the owning class just like republicans do. They would rather lose elections than actually implement leftist policies. It's all intentional.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

It's been a problem ever since the Industrial Revolution, which oligarchs supplanted the aristocracy while class conflict remained. There were attempts at changing the status quo, or overthrowing it and replacing with a different system, there's so much discussion and debate, but actual success of the masses -- if we must have inclusion of those oppressed regardless of race, creed or faith -- has yet to be seen.

One thing is for certain: this time peaceful and legal options are starting to be exhausted of their energy, as the moneyed enemy isn't going to yield easily.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Yes, now realize every establishment Democrat is also paid off by these demons too. Grassroots progressives or RIP the system, I have no other choice.

[-] Dojan@pawb.social 13 points 1 month ago

If you're playing a game by the rules your opponent not only writes, but also actively breaks, and cheats, you're going to lose.

[-] Peacock@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 month ago

Curious why he said Twitch vs Amazon

[-] danski@lemmy.world 107 points 1 month ago

Because he's stating the companies they own that control the narrative. Push the views they want and downplay ones that are critical. Twitch is more relevant than Amazon for that.

[-] Peacock@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 month ago

Thank you that makes sense. I figured he led with The Washington Post for that exact reason but didn't really see Twitch in the same light at first.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The US has been an Oligarchy for quite a while now.

Amongst other things that's why Bernie's campaign to be the Democrat candidate was torpedoed directly by the DNC so that Hillary "I got a cool half a million to give a speech to Goldman Sach's traders" Clinton got the nomination and then proceeded to lose to none other than old-money multi-millionaire Donald Trump.

I mean, it's pretty obvious even before Reagan that the Hierarchy Of Power in the US has in many things had Money as a higher power than Democratically Elected Administration - or in other words, the inverse of the order that it should be in Democracy - and that has expanded to pretty much all things since.

The US (and several other so-called "Democratic" nations) hasn't had Democracy for many years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

forbes just released their 40th billionaires list:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/pr/2026/03/10/forbes-40th-annual-worlds-billionaires-list-elon-musk-is-worlds-richest-person-ever-recorded/

but… their own link is 404. 🤔 interesting. suspicious coincidences one might say.
and while archive.org has multiple copies of every day, just since march 10th when the new one got released… their are no copies

[-] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks, the link works now.

$839 billion (Bernie's post misstates at 829). The most normal and human response to reading this list is to feel physically ill.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kingshrubb@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

There's a word for this: It's called Gleichschaltung

[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

When the hell did Musk get to 800?

This is nuts! I blinked and it happened

[-] Renat@szmer.info 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If one ship cost is one bilion dollars(Elon once bought a yacht for one bilion dollars) he could fund all ships for Achaemenid Empire for Battle of Salamis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why does every post ive seen like this leave out amazon?

[-] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago

Not defending it, but probably because Amazon isn't media or social media. Well, Prime video is media, but it's not a behemoth like Washington Post or CNN, so it's not really relevant in the same way. I think the intent is to point out that almost every information outlet the average person learns about the world from is owned by a group of people small enough to get a table at a restaurant without having to call ahead. Fallout and The Boys being bundled in with your online shopping aren't really influencing people in the same way.

[-] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Amazon serves up a vast amount of the Internet, has live video feeds of almost every neighborhood, is a big player in the AI space, is a retail giant, a movie studio, a streaming platform, and a logistics juggernaut.

It isn't strictly media/influence, but also so much more. Scary stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

More an example of plutocracy, but definitely an example of both.

Unless he's specifically talking about corporate holdings, then it's oligopoly, not oligarchy.

[-] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 1 month ago

It can be considered a form of oligarchy (rule by the few) where the ruling few are wealthy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy

[-] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] einlander@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I thought it was Larry Ellison’s son that is about to own this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skydance_Media

[-] lesinge@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Nepoligarchy?

[-] elbiter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Of course it is. And is also about oligarchs giving orders to the media they control to not call them by that name.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
1595 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11309 readers
1321 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS