115
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world

Democrats should resist the temptation to read this data as good news. Most wavering Trump voters are not becoming Democrats — they are disengaging from politics entirely. Of the 20.1 percent who are wavering, only 3.4 percent plan to vote Democrat. The remaining 16.7 percent say they will vote for neither party or are unsure.

I am most angry at centrist corporate Democrats who made this collapse into fascism nearly inevitable by refusing to do anything but condescend voters in response to the threat of fascism until they checked out from Democracy.

We are all going to hell with you, vapid losers.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 40 points 3 months ago

Don't worry. The Democrats are undoubtedly planning to shift even further right in the hope to scoop these guys up.

[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

I hate that you are absolutely right.

The ratchet turns ever more to the right ... always towards the corporate money.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago

Exactly. Every step to right increases their pool of donors. Trading a leftist for a conservative is literally how the DNC makes money.

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 20 points 3 months ago

I mean, I'd prefer they voted progressive, but I'm fine with them not voting at all.

[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

There would have to be a progressive that was running. In most places there simply isn't. You can't get funding for progressive candidates because the system is designed to ensure anyone who would side with workers over the rich can't win.

The ballot box won't save us, and what might, is not something you can organize on the internet.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There would have to be a progressive that was running.

Get into the party and help make it happen.
They are there, they just don't have the support they need.

Edit:
Bernie, AOC, Omar, don't tell me they are the only ones in a country of 300 million.
But if people don't engage, nothing happens, just like nothing has happened since the 70's to improve democracy in USA, but it on the contrary has gotten worse!
Not engaging leaves the power with the 1%, so blame yourself and your fellow Americans.

[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Like I said, you need money to run a campaign. Donations don't just appear out of the blue, and bootstrapping yourself into a legitimate candidate is a one in a million shot, so yes, progressive candidates exist, but they are exceptionally rare, and usually from a place with strong progressive organizing well below the elected representative level (unions, community orgs, progressive churches, etc.). It takes decades to build a self-sustaining movement, it's not something that happens on the scale of an election cycle, and the internet of 2025 is an overwhelming obstacle, not a useful tool.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is what you wrote:

You can’t get funding for progressive candidates because the system is designed to ensure anyone who would side with workers over the rich can’t win.

And that is simply not true, Obama was elected by a majority of small donations.
Bernie could have run for president if he hadn't been stopped by the undemocratic elections system in the democratic party.

I refrained from answering that part of your post because it doesn't identify the real problem.
There is also a good chance ANY candidate gets money from billionaires because they often support both sides.

You are just making excuses for yourself to do nothing.

[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Obama failed to create lasting change because he had no choice but to bend the knee. The billionaires will not fund candidates that threaten their wealth, and the only way to even begin to fix this is by making sure there's never another billionaire. Every last one of them is an abomination.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You are changing the subject, Obama did NOT have to bend the knee, but I agree the existence of billionaires is contrary to the ideals of democracy.

[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

I am not changing the subject, what ended up becoming the ACA, Obama's single most significant piece of legislation was dramatically watered down, and wildly less ambitious than he set out to achieve, precisely because he could not get anything more significant than he did past the lobbyists on whom their next election cycle depended, even when they had a super-majority to pass it.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You are changing the subject from that progressive candidates can't get funding. They can.

[-] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Progressive candidates can't. Moderates with no firm values at all can claim they're progressive until they are blue in the face but the proof is in the fact that they never achieve anything because if they did, they'd be run out of office.

[-] SnotFlickerman 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean, at this point, they're not entirely wrong. We can't count on this obscenely broken system to save us by "voting harder" like we've been doing for 3 solid decades with nothing but things getting worse and corporate democrats barely fighting back against the worst excesses of the Bush and Trump administrations (and frankly being part and parcel to the worst excesses of the Clinton administration).

It's time to follow the lead of groups like the Black Panthers. They understood the assignment. We cannot count on a system designed to be anti-democratic with anti-democratic institutions like the Senate existing to actually resemble a functioning democracy. We have to turn to Mutual Aid and helping one another.

I get it, a lot of those Trump voters would be shitty candidates to bring into Mutual Aid groups, but their broken cynicism is part of being left behind politically for decades coupled with lack of education. Some of them may still be redeemable and find their skills valuable in Mutual Aid and may start to grow in positive ways that they themselves would have never dreamed.

The citizen observers watching ICE are by and large average citizens, they are not our politicians, who more likely sit in comfy warm offices while the citizens freeze their asses off trying to protect one another. That's the reality, is even though we have a handful of good politicians fighting for us, they are fighting within a broken non-functioning system. That is not their fault and that does not mean their fight is pointless, but we cannot expect them to do the fight alone, we also must protect and support each other... and that means trying to find the least shitty Trump supporters and bring them into the community fold.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
115 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30113 readers
2373 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS