372

Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, ushered in under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, were unlawfully imposed

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, ushered in under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, were unlawfully imposed. Trump had used the act to charge huge levies on countries, including 50% on India, which was later reduced, and 34% on China.

By Friday night, the president posted on Truth Social that he signed an executive order enabling him to bypass Congress and impose a 10% tax on imports from around the world. “It is my Great Honor to have just signed, from the Oval Office, a Global 10% Tariff on all Countries, which will be effective almost immediately,” Trump wrote.

Less than 24 hours later, Trump said he was bumping up the tariffs to 15% “based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued yesterday.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 136 points 1 week ago

He is, for some stupid fucking reason, allowed to impose tarrifs for 150 days.

Then it goes to congress to vote on whether to keep them, and they likely won't.

What a fucking asshole

[-] SnotFlickerman 65 points 1 week ago

and they likely won’t.

You mean the same Republican-dominated congress that has basically given him handjobs every time he breaks a fucking law and does something that is actually under the direction of congress? The same Republican-dominated congress that has essentially abdicated any responsibility to govern at all? I'm skeptical, but I hope you're right.

What a fucking asshole

For real, this is another mask-off moment. He had played up the tariffs as a game to push other countries around, but clearly and literally the only reason he is doing this is because he's pissed off at the Supreme Court. It has fuck-all to do with other countries because it's the same rate, worldwide, with no room for negotiations. He's supposed to be this great negotiator of trade deals with other countries, yet he's blowing up every single potential trade deal with a flat 15% worldwide because he's pissed off at people in his own government.

If people can't tell that he doesn't give a flying fuck about anything except pushing people around, doesn't matter who or about what, they're fucking idiots. He's just a cruel fucking asshole, like you said.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Where does the 150 days come from? FFS, we had nearly a full year before SCOTUS struck down the shit he started last year.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The 150 day limit is part of the law he is citing to justify this set of tariffs.

The Trade Act of 1974.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

WTF, that allows Krasnov to raise consumer prices no matter what.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

Only up to 15% and only for 150 days. After that Congress has to approve an extension.

That being said... I don't know if there is any actual codified safeguard in it to prevent him from just stopping it and starting a new set again. I haven't looked at the exact wording.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 95 points 1 week ago

Just hurry the fuck up and die already. Jesus Christ.

[-] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Trying to imagine if things would be better under Vance...

[-] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

I’m just looking for a win here - however small it may be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

Clots and prayers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

This is Trump's "power move".

We know it's illegal. He knows it's illegal. He wants everyone to know that he knows it's illegal, and he'll do it anyway. What are you gonna do? Yell at him?

He will continue to escalate, he takes great delight in "sticking it" to anyone who disagrees with him. There is no line that he won't cross.

He takes even more delight in "sticking it" to people who AGREE with him. As a rapist, he rapes anybody he can any way he can.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think it's kind of Legal? Smoot -Hawley from 1934-ish was never taken off the books. I cant remember if that's the one he's using for this, but it's like that. There's a never-used vestigial law that lets him do up to 15% for 150 days.

As much of a known-destroyer of America he is, this is Congress failing to do it's bare minimum job of holding the purse strings. They could stop him tomorrow and we would be better off if everyone realized thst

Edit: this one isn't smoot-hawley (1930), sorry. Trade act of 1974. 15%, 150 days and a lot of exemptions under section 122. Congress should still do it job

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Solrac@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

So, basically, starving the peeps of the US, while, every other country, moves out of the US trade.

[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

It'll boost domestic production!! /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So did he just blow up all of those trade deals he made to spite the SC, or are all those countries exempt from the 15%? Based on the UK response quoted in the article, it seems they have similar questions...

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

No one knows. This entire thing is a temper tantrum.

He's apparently applying these tariffs under a different law than the one they used previously, which does explicitly allow the president to apply temporary (150 days) tariffs of up to 15%. So you would assume this is meant to replace the tariffs the SC struck down.

But he's also stated that the previous tariffs are going to stay in effect, just under a different legal theory. So in his mind, it's possible that he thinks this 15% is on top of the existing amounts, and he's literally just tariffing the whole world harder because he's mad about a decision by his judiciary.

Then again, maybe he's just a dementia-ridden old idiot who can't keep his own bullshit straight for more than 30 seconds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

He started as a halfwit, and dementia has diminished that. Don't expect reason or sense. It's all reaction to being told no.

Diaper Don taxing Americans to funnel the money to his board of peace to give to his children in order to build a riviera resort in Gaza.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Who is going to actually enforce these?

What if people just refuse to collect anything, whether it's his 10 or 15 percent?

And tell anyone asking questions to take it up with the Supremes.

[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago

Hey Google, define: racket

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

For real lol, this is garden variety extortion of the "nice place ya got here..." flavor. Even the dumbest criminals alive know this one.

[-] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago
[-] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

So was this, like an hour ago, 10%? Must be based on sound cost-benefit analysis…

[-] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

It took them that long to explain to him that 15 was higher than 10

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Wow, fastest time on record!

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Yes. Please keep it up Trump. We need more time to be in forced diversification from the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

WHAT? An extra 15% tariff on all this stuff that I don't export to america!!! Oh no, oh dear!

Anyways a real man would've put a 1111% tariff on everything. Once again the orange child rapist takes the easy way out!!!

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Fucking toddler. Tantrum-throwing, pants-shitting toddler.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago

I don't think "fuck directly with people's shit because you were handed an L" is a winning political strategy. Will it cost him? Hell no! We've never had a cult leader as president before.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Dragomus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Make it 20%! Nay 25!%
Even retroactively bill your citizens for imports of years ago!

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Lol, I have a real question, does anything actually happen when Trump makes these outlandish terrif statement?

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

More people get convinced to look business outside the US.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes taxes are collected from Americans.

[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

The Supreme Court made a decision and Trump is lashing out like a child in a tantrum. At least that’s what he wants people to believe. It’s probably all about the Epstein files and the fact he was up to his neck with a ring of wealthy pedophile he wants to distract from.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

From the bottom of my heart…

fuck you Trump.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Prices are going to increase again!

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

20000000% Tariff!!!!!!?!

[-] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Now watch him reduce the tariffs again in a little while and all of his rich entourage getting richer because they can buy stocks right before.

[-] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Here we go again, tariff schizo 2026 edition.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
372 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28763 readers
2473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS