312
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 68 points 2 weeks ago

As compared to what? Is he worse than Trump? I sincerely fucking doubt it.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 72 points 2 weeks ago

That's a ridiculously low bar, but it's also an important distinction.

Do I want Gavin Newsom to be the Democrat nominee for 2028? Hell no! He's revealed himself to be a shallow political opportunist and an ideological chameleon. And I think that party can do better.

But regardless, would he be an improvement over Trump? Hell yes!

Another question is: is he - a supposedly populist liberal from California - even electable on a national stage? I don't think so. But then, we live in very 'interesting' times. So who knows.

The third question is: will we have a fair enough election in 2028 (or an election at all)? That remains to be seen.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] q181c@sopuli.xyz 34 points 2 weeks ago

Democrats have been playing the "well they suck, but at least they're not Trump!" game for a decade and gotten Trump two out of three times. Maybe we should aim higher.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

As compared to some of the other candidates that might have run if the Democratic Primary were an actual primary and not a coronation.

The last time Democrats ran an actual primary ws 2008, when a young, generational candidate beat out the (kinda boring) establishment choice. Democrats learned their lesson to never let something encouraging like that happen again!

Gavin's gonna win the Primary, as his right as the Next One Up, and we're all gonna vote for him, because as awful as he is, he is objectively better than whoever the MAGA party will run.

[-] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

And this is the exact attitude why nothing will ever change in this country. You can't keep voting in people hellbent on maintaining the hegemony capital has over everyone and expect anything to get better for you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago
[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The best pushback for this message is to post the entire interview between Newsom and Ben Shapiro and then tell me again who cares about people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrDpBwpSqSc

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago

So more of that lesser evil bullshit that's given us trump and helped shift the entire DNC to the right?

[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Settling for any centrist with a pulse is how we got Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 41 points 2 weeks ago

You mean the serial adulterer who can't read and whose entire life has been sponsored by a Getty oil heir isn't a good candidate for president of the United States? Shocked.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] gnuthing@piefed.social 34 points 2 weeks ago
[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I hate to admit this, but I used to listen to the Adam Corolla podcast years ago, and he had Newsom on as a guest when he was lieutenant governor of California. At the time, he claimed that the biggest issue facing Californians was being unbanked. Like payday loan companies were the worst threat.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Newsom was Lt. Governor of CA from 2011-2019. I am not Californian, and I don't know what they're dealing with outside of the seemingly-constant wildfires, and those seem pretty fucking bad, and I'm sure there are some other pretty terrible things Californians have to deal with, too.

That said, payday loan companies deserve to get spit-roasted by the Devil and the Devil's angriest pet donkey in the deepest bowels of Hell.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 34 points 2 weeks ago

Newsom says he’s eager to pitch a big tent for the Democratic Party, declaring that he welcomes the likes of former US senator Joe Manchin as well as New York’s socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani in the fold. “I want it to be the Manchin to Mamdani party,” Newsom said in November.

Newsom can fuck right the hell off. Manchin represents everything that is wrong with the Democratic party and so, apparently, does Newsom.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

declaring that he welcomes the likes of former US senator Joe Manchin

Turn our backs and give them extra knives, huh gav?

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 30 points 2 weeks ago

Hopefully, we get AOC as the front runner. I am sick of the Democratic establishment.

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Only the democratic establishment could lose to Trump TWICE!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Whirlygirl9@kbin.earth 23 points 2 weeks ago

Watching how fast he threw the trans community under the bus told me everything I needed to know about him. He has the moral compass of a boiled piece of spaghetti... fuck this corpo dem.

[-] Quexotic@infosec.pub 21 points 2 weeks ago

I believe the term is Blue MAGA.

And the worst part is the democratic party will champion this fucker because it's fully bought and paid for.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

I saw him speak at Davos a while ago and I thought he was a big phony guy with very little acting skills but who is constantly acting. Another cult of personality instead of any real depth of thought.

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago

What, this guy? Surely not.

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago

gavin isn't the greatest but he was just following state law

https://bsky.app/profile/parkermolloy.com/post/3merscb5bhs2i

Parker Molloy ‪@parkermolloy.com‬ rubs temples

As I've spent the better part of the day explaining why I don't think Newsom should be the Democratic nominee for president, it pains me to "defend" this, but...

The governor of California is legally obligated to proclaim each Feb 6 Reagan Day per a 2010 state law.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 15 points 2 weeks ago

I personally think Mark Kelly will be running and I just might choose him.

[-] discocactus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

He's the better choice strategically.

[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Only problem is Kelly has the charisma that of a potato.

[-] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] masta_chief@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago

Best way I've heard to describe him is, "at least he's lawful evil"

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago

Such is the standards of our time, where Law, even an Evil variety, is better than the purely malicious Chaos we have. Mostly because the law is running on the fading fumes of Neutral.

Given a few decades of Newsom, we would have Ronald Reagan Deluxe.

[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

Gavin Newsom has a greater chance of losing to Vance and almost any other democratic candidate.

Libs need to stop falling for the 'leftists want trump to win, see look they wont commit to voting for the Democrats' shtick. They just want to discredit the part of the base that's trying to actually save the party.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Mamdani handed the DNC a win and they fought him the whole way anyhow. Centrists as always act like there’s no alternative between centrism and conservatism even though it’s only and specifically because they systematically attack anyone who actually tries to make things truly better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Time for the Tankies to form up the circular firing squad

(With enough Putin bots to give it legs)

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's not just tankies, everyone hates Gavin Newsom, he sucks, if he is picked as a nominee it's further proof the democratic establishment hates their base and is throwing the election again. Bluesky is very liberal and not tankie basically at all and even the comments there are nearly entirely shitting on him for his terrible positions and unlikability. https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3metxjlxwec2d

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Putin bots made Newsom a terrible piece of shit?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] monkeyjoe@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Putin bots are the ones who made Newsom do bad things? Or are they the ones who did the journalism? Or are they they ones who can have a memory beyond 2 weeks?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The only people Newsom appeals to are neo-liberals ashamed that Trump won't keep up appearances and isn't keeping his criminal imperialism masked in the liberal pageantry that we've done for decades or centuries in the US.

He is courting the right, he made a day to celebrate Ronald Fucking Reagan, jesus christ how loud of a dog-whistle do you all need.

Tankies are just roleplay kids, they hate everyone who isn't roleplaying also. Newsom is an actual threat to democracy wrapped in a too-wide smile and promises of a "return to normal." He would be more dangerous than Trump and he would do his damage behind a facade of national cooperation and stability while empowering the lunatics like Thiel and Musk.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yea he’s a fascist. That’s why he platforms Nazi’s and Zionists on his podcast and magically lets them persuade him that they are right. It’s also why he vetoes everything that helps the working class. It’s also why he let PG&E get away with murdering 800 Californians and he allows them to raise our rates 6 times a year while they continue to make record shareholder profits. It’s also why why he is fighting the one time 5% billionaire tax proposed by the California legislature as hard as he can. We need an FDR Newsom is an Israeli asset and a closeted republican who’s Gen z handlers make funny tweets.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
312 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28658 readers
2339 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS