399
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Judge Fred Biery lambasts Trump’s ‘ill-conceived and incompetently-implemented’ mass deportation campaign

A federal judge has ordered the release of a five-year-old boy and his father who were detained by federal immigration agents from their driveway in suburban Minneapolis and sent to a detention center in Texas.

In his ruling on Saturday, District Judge Fred Biery delivered a brutal assessment of Donald Trump’s mass deportation campaign and an “ill-conceived and incompetently-implemented government pursuit of daily deportation quotas” that appears to require “traumatizing children.”

Liam Conejo Ramos was taken into federal custody from the driveway of his family’s home last week after officers arrested his father Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, who is seeking asylum in the United States. They were sent to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in Texas, where the preschooler is reportedly sick, lethargic and asking for his mother, according to his family and lawmakers who visited him this week.

The judge condemned the administration’s apparent “ignorance of an American historical document called the Declaration of Independence” and Thomas Jefferson’s warnings against “a would-be authoritarian king over our nascent nation.”

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 60 points 3 months ago

How can you tell you’re in a republicans house? The bible still has shrink wrap.

[-] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 13 points 3 months ago

That or the pages are littered with paragraph-long highlights, underscores, and "THIS!!!" in the margins but no critical thought or insights on the passages

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

And all those notes and the heavily-read pages are in the Old Testament portion, while the New Testament portion is barely touched.

[-] 51dusty@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago

the date on the order is 2/31/2026..... 🤦

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

It only adds to the sense that he was quivering with barely restrained rage as he wrote the order, which also came through in the text quite nicely I thought.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago
[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

This is, uh, this is not how judges normally sign off on opinions:

[-] j0j0@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

He's trying to add every single bit of gravitas to his order

It's amazing, tbh, one thing I didn't expect from this entire situation is that the judiciary starts to really flex their literary and theatrical muscles in their authority, because while most legal business is rote ritual, they take advantage of that with this, and allow their legal opinions and the weight of their urgency to be seen

It gives me a little hope

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 3 months ago

Normally, no. However it does humanize Liam Conejo Ramos as a child. The judge isn't talking about some child that the public can't visualize. We actually get to see what Liam Conejo Ramos looks like.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Are you suggesting it’s inappropriate?

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

No. I am suggesting that these times are abnormal.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I have to wonder if they really are, or if Trumps regime is just so terrible at optics that we are seeing all the rot they been hiding behind the curtain for years.

He’s not smart enough to amass this much power this fast. He’s not rich enough. He’s not influential enough.

He stole something someone shouldn’t have had in the first place.

[-] Gathorall@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

Yeah, the Bible should not enter legal documents and a judge seemingly taking guidance from it should be disbarred.

[-] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

He quoted “Jesus wept.” Hardly inappropriate.

[-] Gathorall@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

No religion belongs in the courtroom. It is by definition inappropriate and he should be punished for this.

[-] MadBits@europe.pub 5 points 3 months ago

Grow up, bud.

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You act like there's ever been separation of church and state. There has not.

[-] Gathorall@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

All states so indeed still have some theocratic elements. That is precisely why religion should be given no quarter, it already has more prominence in goverment than it ever deserved.

Freedom of religion in most states is just placing religious people above rules that bind everyone else, religious people don't need the addition of lax enforcement ofthe few guidelines that exist to just expand their already extreme unearned and indefensible privilege.

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You're arguing what should be. I would argue the same. We're explaining what is.

[-] MadBits@europe.pub 13 points 3 months ago

Indeed, let's return a 5 year old child to jail because the judge said a few words from the bible. Grow the fuck up. I grew up in a very conservative Christian family, I never was a believer myself but I do respect each ones beliefs as long as they don't bring any harm.

Wishing for a 5 year old child to return to jail because the judge said a few bible phrases is absolutely macabre.

[-] Gathorall@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I didn't say to overturn the judgment. But this could bring him harm. But him being a "Christian" to flaunt his beliefs is more important to this self-absorbed piece of shit judge.

[-] MadBits@europe.pub 11 points 3 months ago

Its more in the sense the maga and the proud boies all cry about the bible and christianity. He spoke in their words and proved their evil. I think he did a fine job with this, honestly. Especially given the whole context.

We need to learn to take off our horse glasses and watch further than religion, especially in times like these.

[-] Gathorall@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Excuses "in times like these" is what got USA to this point. Principles that are dropped when the going gets tough aren't principles, they're an aesthetic.

[-] MadBits@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago

There's a truth in that too.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Perhaps, but, I won’t complain about Christian theology being used against Christofascists, of which I suspect many ICE agents are. Donald Trump has been known to wave a Bible around. Turnabout is fair play.

[-] MadBits@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They are not, most are zionist jews that are part of ICE and try to rally the moronic Christopats like sheep. Here is a good example of it: https://www.instagram.com/reels/DRXjgkriEfB/ (Yea, fuck instagram, its just the first result that popped)

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I doubt that just based on the number of rabidly Zionist Jews relative to their Christian counterparts in civilization society. I suspect many “Proud/Boogaloo Boy” types comprise a significant portion of their ranks. Like 50% or greater, and veterans, jobless young ones who are still quite impressionable.

[-] MadBits@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago

Number wise, the proud boogalo boys are definitely bigger. But despite that, most significant rallies and movements were mostly initiated by jewish zionists. Actually quite a few "white supremacy christian" groups were funded by jewish zionists. Nonetheless, both groups deserve exactly the same thing. Neither the zionists are true jews and neither those so called "christians" have anything to do with Christianity.

[-] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

Leave it to militant atheists to be more concerned about fighting religion than about fighting fascism

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

And why are you making multiple comments about it? Give it a rest already.

[-] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I think it’s cute how mad this guy got lol. Wait til he finds out ICE murders people.

[-] Gathorall@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Enjoy your regressive shithole, you've all earned it with your hard work keeping it that way.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago
[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The regime uses religion to justify ignoring legal norms. The judge knew exactly what he was doing. Basically, even if the Bible matters more than the law, this is STILL wrong.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Other outlets say he has been released, along with his dad

[-] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Appeals courts will overturn. The patriotism of some of the district court judges does not seem to apply to higher courts. Or state courts for that matter fuck them all

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
399 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29912 readers
1476 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS