641
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 246 points 1 month ago

TIL Tim Sweeny is into child porn. Not surprising tbh.

[-] andybytes@programming.dev 16 points 1 month ago

The fall of rome... The fall of the perverse...

[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 159 points 1 month ago

If you can be effectively censored by the banning of a site flooded with CSAM, that's very much your problem and nobody else's.

[-] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 97 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yet another CEO who's super into child porn huh?

[-] andybytes@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

Maybe we are the only people that don't f kids. Maybe this is "H' "E" Double Hockey Sticks.

[-] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 89 points 1 month ago

I'll keep in mind Tim think child porn is just politics.

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago

It is when one side of the political palette is "against" it but keeps supporting people who think CSAM is a-okay, while the other side finds it abhorrent regardless who's pushing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] popcar2@piefed.ca 76 points 1 month ago
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

It helps that Tim Sweeney seems to always be wrong about everything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 67 points 1 month ago

Somebody is in a certain set of files

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 50 points 1 month ago

His opinion is as trash as his gaming storefront that insists its a platform.

[-] DeadWorld@lemmy.zip 47 points 1 month ago

Someone beat this man for attempting to defent AI csam

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 40 points 1 month ago

I wonder which AI companies he’s invested in

[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 37 points 1 month ago

inb4 "In a stunning 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court has ruled that AI-generated CSAM is constitutionally protected speech"

[-] KelvarCherry 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did Covid-19 make everyone lose their minds? This isn't about corporate folks being cruel or egotistical. This is just a stupid thing to say. Has the world lost the concept of PR??? Genuinely defending 𝕏 in the year 2026... for Deepfake porn including of minors!!???? From the Fortnite company guy???

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Unironically this behaviour is just "pivoting to a run for office as a Republican" vibes nowadays.

Its no longer even 'weird behaviour' for a US CEO.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Imagine where Epic would be if they had just censored Tim Sweeney’s Twitter account.

It’s like he’s hell bent on driving people away from Epic. I’m not sure I could be more abrasive if I tried, without losing the plausible deniability of not trying to troll.

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago

Not just asshole. Nonce asshole.

[-] blinfabian@feddit.nl 32 points 1 month ago

steam

does nothing

wins

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Tim Sweeney vocally supports child porn and deep fake porn? He certainly looks like the type of creeper, so I guess I'm not that surprised.

I wonder how many times he's been to Trump and Epstein's Pedophile Island 🤔

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

IMO commenters here discussing the definition of CSAM are missing the point. Definitions are working tools; it's fine to change them as you need. The real thing to talk about is the presence or absence of a victim.

Non-consensual porn victimises the person being depicted, because it violates the person's rights over their own body — including its image. Plus it's ripe material for harassment.

This is still true if the porn in question is machine-generated, and the sexual acts being depicted did not happen. Like the sort of thing Grok is able to generate. This is what Timothy Sweeney (as usual, completely detached from reality) is missing.

And it applies to children and adults. The only difference is that adults can still consent to have their image shared as porn; children cannot. As such, porn depicting children will be always non-consensual, thus always victimising the children in question.

Now, someone else mentioned Bart's dick appears in the Simpsons movie. The key difference is that Bart is not a child, it is not even a person to begin with, it is a fictional character. There's no victim.


EDIT: I'm going to abridge what I said above, in a way that even my dog would understand:

What Grok is doing is harmful, there are victims of that, regardless of some "ackshyually this is not CSAM lol lmao". And yet you guys keep babbling about definitions?

Everything else I said here was contextualising and detailing the above.

Is this clear now? Or will I get yet another lying piece of shit (like @Atomic@sh.itjust.works) going out of their way to misinterpret what I said?

(I don't even have a dog.)

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Absolutely insane take. The reason Grok can generate CP is because it was trained on it. Musk should be arrested just for owning that shit.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 1 month ago

We all live in a two tier justice system.

The one tier is for the capital class. Generally, as long as they don't commit crimes against the government or others in the capital class. These offenders get the slap on the wrist justice system. The Government had enough evidence between witnesses and documentary evidence from the Epstein files to atleast open investigations and charge some of the people. The only people to be arrested and charged were Epstein and Maxwell. It took a long time before either of them faced any serious consequences for their actions.

Everyone else gets the go fuck yourself justice system.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GoblinGreg@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Isn't this the "won't somebody please think of the children" party?

[-] Dhar@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago

Oh, they're thinking of 'em all right!

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

Tim Sweeney is into child porn

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago

So he's saying CSAM is free/protected speech? Got it.

Dude had absolutely no reason to out himself as a paedophile, but that seems to be exactly what he's done. And for what? Epic is in legal battles to get onto other companies' platforms (Google's Android and Apple's iOS) without paying the fees outlined in the terms and conditions every other developer had to agree to. I'm not saying he's 100% wrong in that opinion, but outing himself as a paedophile by stating CSAM is protected speech only hurts his argument in the other case, because he's saying he could put CSAM on his own platform (i.e. Fortnite, a game aimed at children and teenagers) and he'd be against you censoring his "free" and "protected" speech.

I just see no good outcomes for what Sweeney is fighting for here.

To address the political opponents angle, no one was calling for a Twitter/X ban before the CSAM problem, even when our political opponents were up there (i.e. before and after Trump was banned and un-banned).

[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

What a surprise, Tim Sweeney is still a shit person

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 17 points 1 month ago

Not in the least surprised by this bag of slimy cocks

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah. I’m as tired of the argument that pretty much anything goes as far as free speech goes as I am of the “everything is a slippery slope when we make laws to keep people from doing harmful shit.”

I mean what’s the required damage before people put a stop to inciteful speech and objectively harmful lies? Or making CSAM of kids using a platform like X? Germany had to kill a few million people before they decided that maybe displaying Nazi symbols and speech wasn’t a good idea. So we have a platform being used to make CSAM. What’s it going to take before someone says that this is a bad idea and shouldn’t be done? How many kids will commit suicide after being taunted and shamed for their images being used? How many is “enough”? There should be immediate action to end the means to use these tools to make porn, there’s plenty of porn available on the internet and making it from user-submitted images on a major public platform is a horrible idea, but too many make up all kinds of reasons why we can’t do that…economic, censorship, whatever.

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 month ago

This is SO SURPRISING that in a Country run by JEFFREY EPSTEINS BEST FRIEND who's using YOUR TAX DOLLARS to Protect Pedophiles and Child Sex Traffickers that people would call the CREATION OF CHILD PORN A PROTECTED ACT!

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did he take an oath against common sense? Is he bound by a curse to have bad takes for his entire life? Does he ragebait as a living? What the actual fuck is up with this man?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago

sweeney sounds like a pedo

[-] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pedo and facist defendant Tim Sweeney. Burn his business down by disconnecting your, patronage, money, time, etc. Boards can find CEOs who are not supporters of Pedo and Facists

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Im not going to comment on whatever he's commenting on.

Im just going to re-affirm that Tim Sweeney is a fucking moron. in any and all cases

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago

TIL Tim Sweeney doesn't know what gatekeeping is

[-] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

That's not even what gatekeeping means. Unless he's trying to stand up for the universal right to participate in the child porn fandom.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gwl 10 points 1 month ago

I wonder if his name showed up in the Epstein Files

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Bro should have stopped after UE3 and fucked off forever

[-] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Just look at that guy. If you were to ask 1000 people to describe what they thought a typical CSAM viewer looked like and averaged their responses together you would get something like this photo of Tim Sweeney.

[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Tim Epic sucks, and has always sucked. Bring back Unreal Tournament you coward.

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 9 points 1 month ago

I'm no fan of banning this or that particular platform (it's like trying to get rid of cheeseburgers by banning McDonalds; the burgers are still available from all the other burger chains and all the people who use the one will just switch to others) but this is a hilariously wrong way to get to the right answer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 8 points 1 month ago

As if we didn't need more reasons to hate on epicgames.

[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The only “charitable” take I can give this is that he’s been fighting Apple and Google over store fees and the like and that he feels like if he says that Apple/Google can do this then they should be able to restrict EGS as well.

I don’t know why CSAM AI material is the hill you’d make this point with though.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

This is almost as sus as the the specific preferred age range terminology for pedophiles that comes up now and again in the most uncomfortable of scenarios

[-] jali67@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They are all such vile people 💀

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

From making CSAM? Makes you wonder about this Sweeny guy.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
641 points (100.0% liked)

Games

24026 readers
33 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS