581
manbearpig (quokk.au)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Alright people, that's a wrap. I'm going to be handing out a few bans, if you think I've banned you wrongly (or missed someone) feel free to message as I'm only human and may make some mistakes trying to navigate this dumpster fire of a comments section.

Edit: Done, I think? Some comment removal is not working, or maybe taking a bit of time in the background. Please report anything you see if you've come across it.

[-] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 114 points 5 days ago

My old boss says she rather risk her life riding a weemo taxi than take a Uber.

When asked why, she said that an Uber driver dropped her off at home, after about 15 minutes, then Uber driver was still messaging her. She ignored it. After 15 minutes later, the APP asked her if anything is wrong because the driver was still parked at her front door.

She called the police and they showed up 30 minutes later and made him leave. Dude was at her house messaging her for 45 minutes.

Ya, I'm a dude and I would also choose bear.

[-] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 83 points 5 days ago

It's also wild to me that I've been told multiple times by experienced outdoorsmen that the most dangerous animal you can encounter in the woods is another human, but that's entirely forgotten as soon as the culture war revs up.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 39 points 5 days ago

yup. all kinds of people in this thread equating "encountering a bear" to "being mauled by a bear"

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 days ago

clearly they haven't met a moose

but yeah, animals mostly just want to be left alone. usually it is pretty easy to do that when you come across one

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Jimbo@pawb.social 89 points 5 days ago

Oh god mgtow. That whole thing is a walking red flag

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 46 points 5 days ago

I generally dislike writing off people (or groups or things) based on a soundbite or a hashtag - I'd much rather evaluate for myself whether there's any decent and informative point to the content.

#mgtow though... The very presence of it makes one cringe, and I can't think of an occasion when it hasn't descended into a dumpster fire from there.

I suppose it's nice of them to flag their own content so well really.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 47 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I'm shocked at the level of misogyny on Lemmy. I swear shit was never this bad even a few months ago? Maybe I was being ignorant.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 29 points 5 days ago

Na, never has been different. Look up any thread that even mildly implies men could do something wrong and it's only hate from there on.

I wonder why tough. Lemmy is fairly left, pro LGBTQI+, etc. but in regards to anything mildly feminist you get... well, this kind of lovely thread.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I feel bad for note paying attention to it sooner. I think I'm going to have to post more of this sort of content all over the place to piss of the sexists.

Sadly brocialism is a thing amongst some leftists.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 days ago

the root of most hate, and i mean like… DEEP hate isn't any active emotion towards another person but instead an unwillingness to audit our blindspots. what i see a lot on lemmy is people who are steeped in Internet Culture who assume that they are progressive, forward thinking, and have it all figured out. i try to come into discussions with the mindset that i'm guilty of this, too, and that i'm a work in progress.

there's also a deep seated fundamental misunderstanding of what feminism is here that matches very directly to what you would get used to seeing on reddit. it's kind of funny, because it demonstrates that the Read Theory bros theories don't consider critical marxist analysis of gender to be part of the theory that needs to be read, which is frustrating, bordering on upsetting. anytime i recommend someone read bell hooks' Feminism is For Everyone i get antsy about how long in will take for someone who's let conservatives tell them what feminism is to tell me that's a propaganda rag and that bell hooks doesn't know what feminism is

it's like solidarity amongst the lower classes only matters up until the point when you have to start working against the oldest arbitrary division that's been used to keep us from organizing

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 17 points 5 days ago

Unfortunately no, it’s been like this since I made my first account over 2 yrs ago. It hasn’t really gotten worse but it’s also not getting better. It’s basically why the AFAB cis population of the platform is tiny. Why would women stick around when this stuff is what every post about women turns into..

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reliv3@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

I hope it may be a bit of confirmation bias. Most of the people who are not misogynists just move on after reading the meme and don't comment. I was about to do the same until I saw this comment thread, and now I'm in the gutter of other comment threads here trying to fight the good fight 🤣.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

I don't understand why this triggers so many men. I think a lot of them just have absolutely no experience talking with women or reading about their interactions with men. Just a total lack of curiosity or interest in what life is like for women.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 15 points 5 days ago

absolutely no experience talking with women

Also, most people have no experience with wildlife and think all bears are murder machines.

The vast majority of bear encounters outside of very specific locations are with black bears. In which case you just end up momentarily scaring each other and then they run away.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Shave_MyBeever@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Men in general have no idea what women have to deal with [from men]. And so many men are fragile and want to turn it around and make themselves the victims. If you are having a hard time befriending women, then you need to look deeper into your actions and how they might be perceived by someone who has to deal with unprovoked messaging, calling, touching, staring, following, etc. Men are the reason women travel in groups to the restroom, or that there is such a thing as a drink cover in a bar, or that there are women only driver options for ride services, etc. etc. You just need to realize that even if the actual percentage of men who are creepers is low, it doesn't mean that the number of interactions women have with them is not. All it takes is one scary moment for a woman to be put on the defensive for good.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dvixen@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

A bear's intentions are obvious.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 29 points 5 days ago

This argument is so dumb. Women are assuming the random man will rape them just because (what?) and men are assuming the women would rather get mauled to death by a bear (likely) then what I think they're thinking is that they can befriend it or something? It is mildly insulting when someone says to your face "I'd rather be mauled to death than spend a second alone with you". I've never come across this situation in real life however so I think this is a nonsense internet argument intended to drum up division and distract us from making guillotines.

[-] reliv3@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago

You are misunderstanding what women are implying with this meme. It is about probability not pre-determined outcomes. Women are more fearful of the man because they believe there is more chance of being harmed by a random man than a random bear. This neither implies every man will threaten her nor every bear will maul her.

[-] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Just entertaining this is true, you DO realize how horrible it is to hear "I think you're more dangerous than a random bear just for existing"? And this isn't supposed to give men lasting mental health issues and extreme social anxiety?

[-] reliv3@lemmy.world 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I can't say how it's going to affect all men, but for me (who is a man) that is not how it affects me. The fact that there exists a lot of mysogonistic men doesn't reflect on me. I am confident that I'd be one of the men who'd just leave a woman alone if we ever met in the woods, so knowing that there are a lot of men out their who wouldn't doesn't get me salty at the women who are fearful of them; but rather, it gets me salty at the shithead men out there who are ultimately the root of the women's fear.

Right now, you are ultimately expressing your anger towards the hypothetical victim rather getting angry at the hypothetical asshole.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MummysLittleBloodSlut 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Bro. I know you're not a rapist, but you're going to have to accept that lots of men are rapists. If you want people to think of men in general as nice people, you need to fight the rapists. Right now you're not doing that.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Hypnotoad_@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago

Awwww are your fee fees hurt

Dude you sound so sad. Yes, dudes suck towards women, a lot. Accept it. It's not a reflection on you personally. But, your reaction is telling (all about ME and MY feelings)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 24 points 5 days ago

Post of a kind "Men once again prove women right"

[-] Marinatorres@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

Wild how a simple safety tip got turned into a whole fantasy scenario. Sometimes the point really is just: let people feel safe.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 30 points 5 days ago

IDK, I'm not sold.

Neither Man nor Bear isn't presented as an option, the choices were Man or Bear so anybody who chooses Bear is CHOOSING THE BEAR. Bears are not kind to humans in their territory, if you run into a mother then you're going to be torn apart.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 94 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

anybody who chooses Bear is CHOOSING THE BEAR

But she's getting both. Big brown bear and insufferably smug, demonstrably useless, petty and vindictive man.

Bears are not kind to humans in their territory

Bears generally leave you alone unless you've got food and they're hungry... at which point, just give them your food and you'll be fine. Despite millions of humans living in historical bear territory, you get only 2-5 actual attacks reported per year.

Men can't make this claim.

load more comments (66 replies)
[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 40 points 5 days ago

Too lazy to look through my post history but iirc men are MUCH more likely to kill someone than a bear, adjusted for population. You can search through it if you’d like. Men are much more violent than bears.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
581 points (100.0% liked)

People Mastodon

218 readers
389 users here now

People tooting stuff. We allow toots from anyone and are platform agnostic (Mastodon, BlueSky, Twitter, Tumblr, FaceBook, Whatever)

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS