371
submitted 5 months ago by slaacaa@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 140 points 5 months ago

That’s cause Star Citizen is a grift.

[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 79 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

100% selling hopes and dreams. I understand there's a playable alpha, I was a backer for over a decade. There is no cohesive vision, just endless theory crafting and half baked implementations to maintain the illusion of progress, but every time they add something, they seemingly need to break something else for their 8 ticks-per-second system to be able to handle it...

[-] jagermo@feddit.org 28 points 5 months ago

I have fun. You don't have to pay more than the 45 € beginner pack, if you don't want to. Its still rough but you can see how the pieces start fitting together.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You don't have to pay more than the 45 € beginner pack

That's an absolutely obscene ask for an eight-year-old game with no prospects of being finished in the foreseeable future – let alone that it has macrotransactions for things like paints and intentionally puts you at a disadvantage to players who paid hundreds of euros for this stupid piece of shit grift.

[-] cole@lemdro.id 9 points 5 months ago

nah it's not pay to win. it's not hard to earn in-game money and buy ships with that

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Eh,depending on which state the "economy" is in, it can be pretty hard. There's threads all over spectrum about how Grundy and broken things always are.

If there was much game to actually win, I would definitely call it pay to win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fonix232@fedia.io 48 points 5 months ago

"Hey come pay yesteryear's AAA title price for a game that's been overpromising and underdelivering for the better part of the past two decades" is not the sales pitch you think it is...

Sunk cost fallacy is a bitch. One must be severely delusional to think that after paying however much you did AND waiting for 12+ years, having a barely playable alpha when the original timeline was for a 2015 release AND it's still being promised for a 2027 release (which, given the state of the alpha, is likely to be missed too), this is in any way acceptable.

[-] Skipcast@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

How much of a financial investment do you think €45 is over 10+ years? It's nothing. There's literally no sunk cost fallacy here

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 20 points 5 months ago

Holy delulu. The fact that you didn't get anything for over 12 years AND you still protect the company AND urge others to invest is proof of the fallacy here. The inability to admit you've been scammed. That you didn't get what you've been promised over and over and over.

[-] Skipcast@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Bruh lmao

Where did I urge anyone to buy the game? Or protect the company for that matter?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I've watched the pieces "start fitting together" for like 14 years now... There is fun to be had, but it's an ocean wide and an inch deep imo. SC stopped being fun for me the moment I realized most of the fun I was having was imagining hypotheticals to pass the time while fighting their shit product to function in some meaningful way. This becomes especially painful when you see all of the effort is supposedly going into a single-player game that we've barely seen while they fail to deliver an acceptably functional version of the product we actually play and use the ships we payed money for in...

It has other massive problems with the company's motives. For example: why balance the game to incorporate cohesive and effective multicrew ships, and sell 1 person a 725$(CAD) ship (hammerhead) to invite 6 other people to crew, when they can leave it's future balance a dream and have everyone in OP F8s (or whatever the current light fighter "meta" ship is at the moment) for 260$ each... 725$ dollar multicrew ship, or 1,820$ in light fighters. hrmmmmm A Hammerhead should melt light fighters according to it's stated purpose when sold, but it's been effectively useless for years and years now, as one very clear example of what's going on overall.

Multicrew will NEVER BE FUN until they're done milking their base, and they'll never be done milking their base.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 months ago

I'll wait thanks, I have not paid that much in a game all year and don't intend to start now on something so unfinished.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Agreed, IIRC they have a free weekend every now and then. A couple of years back I gave it a spin, realized what I wasn't missing, and went back to Elite Dangerous and No Man's Sky. You know, working space games...

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

I bought a $60 ship back in 2013 or whatever and have only tried it a few times since.

I would definitely recommend waiting for when - and if - it comes out as a polished product.

Most of the limited number of projects I backed on Kickstarter have succeeded, but Star Citizen is one of the two lessons I learned about throwing early money at big projects. Can't believe it's been over twelve years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Doesn't matter that you can try the game for free several times a year either. Stop having fun! Grrrrr!

/s

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

they've funded a billion dollars and worked over a decade on a game. it should not be rough.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Hell of a grift.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 103 points 5 months ago

Game development as a service.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 85 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

$1 billion !?

That is insane.

Elite Dangerous had a budget of £8m... if Cloud Imperium Games can't release SC for a hundred times that amount it's because it's a grift.

[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 26 points 5 months ago

You did a reverse EriKa KirK there. I think you meant "grift" not "gift"

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 27 points 5 months ago

I did indeed.

I blame Samsung's appalling autocorrect.

[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 20 points 5 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

it's because it's a grift.

Always has been.

Look at the price of those ships you can buy, its always looked like a very obvious attempt to keep rolling in money while always juuuuuuust being a bit too far away to release. But just give us a few more million and we'll toooootally release it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 62 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Average Store Citizen player

We just need to buy another ship guise, they're so close to release!

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] fennesz12@feddit.dk 42 points 5 months ago

I spent 40$ on it back in 2013. I looked forward to playing the single player campaign.

Then I found a girl. Went through university. Got a career. Had two kids. Got a divorce. And now I have time to play it again, but feel like I've mostly grown out of gaming.

GG Chris Roberts.

[-] fantacyde 40 points 5 months ago

Gonna get Senior Citizen before full release Star Citizen

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] marzhall@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

My friends were very excitedly talking about setting up a corp in this when it was first announced.

They wanted my buy-in, and I asked if I could be head of HR, to which they said "yes".

So I bought it, created our corp, and performed my ideal goal: set up a corp recruitment posting called "entry-level Star Citizen player" which required 10+ years in Star Citizen.

We're now at the point where I have to find my log-in and change that to 20+ for the joke to make sense again.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

I backed it a lifetime ago and have gone back and forth between “it’s a scam” and “maybe it could happen” so many times that I just don’t care any more. As broken as it is and as slow as progress has been, there has never been anything like it. I check in a couple of times every year and usually have fun seeing the sights for a week or two. I think I’ve had enough enjoyment from it to justify my original cost.

Even though their goals are unreasonable, irrational, and completely mad, they have somehow managed to fund stable development for over a decade and have actually made meaningful progress. Will I live to see it realized? Who knows. I wish them luck for both their sakes and the people who spent big money on this ridiculous dream, but unlike many others, I have no hard feelings personally. I’d like to see it realized someday, but I have no more money to give them even if I wanted to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] llamapocalypse@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Goddamn just come play EVE, we have crime, pretty ships, and hilarity

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Started EVE in like 2009, now I find it just ends up taking so much time to do anything. Never been into 1v1 PvP but do like small to medium groups, but that can take so much time to get and you might not even find anything.

So it ends up with you sitting there for ages with nothing going on, then When it does start to get interesting sorry gotta drop off to go to bed.

I think Anvil Empires might scratch a similar itch for me, while being a bit easier to drop in/out. Albion Online is one I tried too but barely even got into much PvP, maybe I should try again. I like cheap builds really, don't want to grind for hours to lose it all in 1 go. Not sure how cheap you can reasonably go in AO.

[-] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Elite dangerous is a blast for a while. And it has vr.

I haven't played since before you could go and walk around, but for what it is I loved it for a while.

Wide as an ocean and deep as a puddle but it takes a long while to notice the lack of depth and it's a blast to pop in your vr headset and some good country trucking music and just hop around the galaxy trading.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wooki@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

You have a sandbox for griefers. Nota chance in hell. Eve is not even remotely close to similar except it too grifts players

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in 22 points 5 months ago

I'd be just fine with an Everspace 2 multiplayer expansion with just 1/10th of this budget.

[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I really wish another company would come along and just do properly what CIG pretends they're doing. I would love the game SC shows in their marketing, I wish a company would come along and make their own competent version of that experience while leaving the Chris Roberts and CIG jank and practices behind. They should hire Todd Papy.

[-] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Lmao.

Even my non-gamer wife knows about the scam that is SC. Honestly, at least it's just whales who fall for it, who had too much money undeservedly either way. 🤷

[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

I've played elite dangerous for 4k hours. Done everything there is to do in that game. Had a great time. Glad I chose that game instead of the SC scam.

[-] EarMaster@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I can somehow understand the people who funded it in the first place, but who invests now in a project which has already been in development hell for more than a decade and produced barely anything playable. Every whale has already been milked - what return of investment can an investor expect of Star Citizen?

[-] directive0@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Not to defend SC too much, and full disclosure I don't play it. But I have friends who DO play it and it seems like they are having a lot of fun?

They aren't evangelists for the game or anything, so its not a fanboy situation. They just play it a lot, and with lots of other people. They have an online community and meet up IRL for events. Post vids of their exploits. It seems fun to me? I asked them about the bugs and stuff and they fully admit it is buggy and things are broken, they make no apologies for it. They figure out workarounds and share it with the crew. I don't know, these guys are usually pretty critical of games but they seem happy weirdly. Maybe a cult?

There is no fucking way that I am ever going to pay for a fake star ship or anything so I'm not even considering it. And the entire funding model of the game seems batshit insane to me. But to me it seems like the idea that the game is unplayable doesn't really match the reality? Its clearly not a good value proposition at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] silver_wings_of_morning@feddit.dk 17 points 5 months ago

yeah but how sick is the game gonna be after $1 billion in funding

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Now imagine it being double that good for just $2 billion!

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

People still contribute to this scam? That‘s a shame.

[-] AstaKask@lemmy.cafe 13 points 5 months ago

I swear social media people with a very limited grip on what "scam" and "grift" means are more obsessed with Star Citizen than us who actually play it. I log on to do some space trucking when I need to relax, or want to check out whatever new has been added. I've gotten more value out of that game in the last couple of years than any I've bought since. Many AAA games I don't even remember playing.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I like this take.

It seems like there are ‘victims’ caught up in the hype and sinking way too much money into SC. But if the gameplay is enjoyable, and fits your budget? Enjoy it. Hell yes.

[-] Rhoeri@piefed.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Categorically, this article doesn’t even belong in this sub. Star Citizen isn’t even a game…. It’s a scam.

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

Note that Duke Nukem Forever released (poorly) before this travesty.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
371 points (100.0% liked)

Games

48813 readers
572 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS