Does that mean the next Democrat can do an executive order wiping out the 2nd amendment?

No. Keyword there being Democrat. It will be unconstitutional because a Democrat wants to do it, it would be ruled the other way if it was a Republican trying to do it.

It's the product of the clown show fake SCOTUS we have currently: desired outcomes first, rational to justify second.

subject to the jurisdiction thereof

They're not going to directly overturn anything, they're going to argue that people who aren't in the US legally aren't "subject to the jurisdiction thereof", even though they're subject to it's jurisdiction enough to be arrested, tried and convicted. It's generally been understood that the clause was meant to exclude people with diplomatic immunity or something like it, but SCOTUS will ignore that in the name of "originalism".

Some americans unironically believe that piece of parchment to be almighty, self-evident, irreproachable, and universally revered.

Unfortunately those in power have transferred that belief to Trump. That's all it took to abolish the rule of law.

Because the constitution is just words unless people act as though they are binding to all government officials. The republican party pushed through cynical movements to ensure that those who truly believe weren't going to be nominated to the court under their presidencies

Got their passports with you?

You mean the fraudulent passports your parents acquired with their fraudulent birth certificates? Don't worry about trying to figure out which hospital they were born at, we already booked their tickets to Cambodia

6-3 unsigned, drops Friday evening