Do we know how the male police were dress ? I’m pretty sure they were dress provocatively. Did they think at how they will destroy the career of this female peace officer ? They’re selfish!
Tap for spoiler
This is Sarcasm if you didn’t already know
Also ACAB
Ah but you see, making a cop uncomfortable is one of the very most illegal things.
They were probably dressed like strippers
Okay so cops can get sacked for sexual harassment but only if the victim is another cop I guess
And the perpetrator is a woman
Unless the victim is a female cop because then they're asking for it.
They're British.
The first A in ACAB doesn't stand for "American"
Edit: have a source
True, but I was under the impression that the comments about behavior were US related. Are British cops known to also act in that way?
I'm not sure if you understood his point about the first A in ACAB.
Alright I get it.
Just in case for those in the back the first A stands for
Tap for spoiler
Aardvark
.
That’s quite literally copping a feel.
And feeling a cop.
Clementine, no!
Bet she's getting job offers from US police depts.
Big of you to assume they'd let a girl join...
Fox News new Anchor.
If you can’t party at a work party then don’t call it a party
She sounds fun!
"Sacked" means fired in this case, right? Only asking because it seems like it could easily mean something else given the details.
Yeah, she was let go.
drinking at a leaving do
Us Americans should adopt this terminology.
You Americans can do whatever you want. 😉
THIS is what cops get punished for?
Only if they're female. If a male cop did it he'd get promoted
who made the complaint? is the head cheif who fired her a woman? was the guy who was harassed gay?
Not every straight man is as desperate as you, so being a straight man shouldn’t be an automatic assumption of consent.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.