492

Meta allegedly gave accounts engaged in the “trafficking of humans for sex” 16 chances before suspending them, according to testimony from the company’s former head of safety and well-being, Vaishnavi Jayakumar. The testimony — along with several other claims that Meta ignored problems if they increased engagement — surfaced in an unredacted court filing related to a social media child safety lawsuit filed by school districts across the country.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wow it seems like corporations condone child abuse.

It really seems like we need some "proportionality laws" such as "a service provider cannot treat illegal activity with more lenience than civil disputes" and retain neutrality protections.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 185 points 2 days ago

meanwhile YouTube had a 3 strike policy for copyright claims that might not even be true

[-] Tanoh@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago

Ah, but corporate profit margins are much more important than people

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Ha ha ha ha........ha..........

cries

[-] vas@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

... to google. (Not sure if it's generalizable to 95% of for-profit corporations by the legal definition of for-profit. But we know for sure about google.)

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 14 points 2 days ago

How many strikes do they allow now?

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Infinite until there are actual consequences for the company.

[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 92 points 2 days ago

Jesus fuck, even 3-strikes would be absurd for this...

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 40 points 2 days ago

17 is an oddly specific number.

[-] Kooper@feddit.org 28 points 2 days ago

Those kinds of people probably don't like anything the moment it turns 18

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago

Meta doesn't like it when they're legal

[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago

I have to believe Jerry, the exec who's bad at his job but the CEO likes him, has 16 strikes. One more strike, and the CEO will be forced to update the policy again.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

18 is too many ~~years~~ chances.

[-] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

hey look who hasn't been busted doing the same wrong thing on the 15th time and thought, "man y'know what it's time to turn myself around..."

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

"Promise me you won't be sending 15 year olds to your island next time, Epstein, or you will be banned if you do it again for the 16th time."

Although, seriously, this explains a lot why Trump admin and the oligarchs are sexual deviants.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago

I think, more likely, they had a 3 strike rule. But he kept breaking it, so they increased it to 4. And again. And again.

And that's how we ended up at 16

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

So in reality they had an n + 1 strike policy. Brilliant.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

Stop! Or I shall be forced to say stop another time!

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 days ago

I'm not defending the policy but the title doesn't match the story:

“That means that you could incur 16 violations for prostitution and sexual solicitation, and upon the 17th violation, your account would be suspended,”

[-] Mk23simp 17 points 2 days ago

So, 17 strikes you're out.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Thats why baseball games in the 1800s were much longer.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

You should look into the history of cricket

[-] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

I mean, it IS The Verge. They could be so inept that they just forgot to include anything relating to the title in their story

[-] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

that matches the title completely

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

Sex work =/= sex trafficking

[-] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

Meta allegedly gave accounts engaged in the “trafficking of humans for sex” 16 chances before suspending them,

the article is about sex trafficking, the policy would also apply to sex workers, eventually.

not everything about sex trafficking is about sex workers…

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Unless they have to drive to you during rush hour. Then it's sex work with traffic.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Sometimes. Probably not on Facebook.

There's a pretty good This American Life about it. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/740/there-i-fixed-it

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What's "This american life", beyond a podcast? Not something I'm familiar with.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Just a podcast.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 days ago

“We strongly disagree with these allegations, which rely on cherry-picked quotes and misinformed opinions in an attempt to present a deliberately misleading picture,” Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said in an emailed statement to The Verge.

Press X for doubt.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

I tried reporting a blatant kidnapping/pig butchering gang, and there literally wasn’t a category for it in their reporting mechanism. I picked the closest thing I could think of, and naturally the report just got ignored.

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

Meanwhile, one harmless meme and you're suspended. I don't get why people use Meta anymore. The site went to shit 20 years ago, and nobody seems to want to jump to another platform. For reasons unknown - there was no issue leaving MySpace for Facebook, so just fucking do it again.

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I've been using it for news since Reddit fucking banned my ass

[-] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Idk the only time I've seen Facebook dot com links is when my parents send me AI videos of animals. I'm trying to get them off of it but they are set in their ways, etc etc

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on you. Fool me three times, shame on you. Fool me four times...

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

/community

What the fuck

this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
492 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

18703 readers
1877 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS