473

Well, so much for scientific research in Antarctica…it’s about to be a war zone.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gormadt 72 points 3 days ago

Born too late to die in war over oil, born too early to die in war over oil, born just in time to die in war over oil.

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 25 points 3 days ago

Shhhh no talk only die

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 159 points 4 days ago
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Add this to the list of "problems the wealthy make sure we don't solve."

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Death ~~to~~ by Oil

fixed

[-] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 13 points 4 days ago

We should make a song, death..death to the O.I.L.... Same tune as Bob Vylan did in Glastonbury.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago

I fear it's rather death for, or death by oil for us.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 days ago

Trump's about to liberate Antarta... Aunt Tart... Antitartica... the place where the polar bears live!

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Fun fact, though you may have known. Arctic basically means "of the bear" because of the northern position of Ursa Major (bear constellation, also the Big Dipper). Antarctic means "not of the bear". Because of how words work, it's also Arctic = "north" and Antarctic = "anti-north".

[-] J92@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Also pretty fun coincidence that the northern one is the only one with actual bears.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 119 points 4 days ago

The year is 2070. Common daily temps are between 35-45°C. Only 200k humans survive globally, and barely.

They still use fossil fuels to generate electricity...

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 61 points 4 days ago

A truce has been reached between the forces of AE-X11 Musk and the virtual consciousness of Jeff Bezos as they vow to unite against the tribal council of the former Russian Federation to secure the remaining oil reserves in the desert plains of the Antarctic continent

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 20 points 4 days ago

If there’s only 200K people left, everything is going to be fine … for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] j_elgato@leminal.space 4 points 3 days ago

200K?

Hey everyone, check it out, this guy still has some optimism left!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Strider@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

It's amazing how we always find ways to speedrun our downfall.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Hey what is this we? Don't bring me into this. It's always the same few assholes at the top doing it all

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Is it not incumbent upon the rest of society to stop a maniac when he threatens to burn everything down? Inaction in the face of evil is complicity. We all need to start organizing for the revolution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

We? Bring them behind the shed in my back yard and 'we' won't have this problem.

I'd happily eat some long pig to reduce the overabundance of whiny bitches with money.

[-] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Now, see, this is what we are not allowed to talk about. But it leads to this.

[-] jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Wasn't this in news cycles back in July? I feel like I'm going crazy here.

[-] excral@feddit.org 29 points 3 days ago

The issue with fossile fuels or more generally oil dependency isn't the limited availability. It's that they're massive deposits of stored carbon and if we start burning them they get released to the atmosphere. With the oil deposits already known if we use them all, we'd have killed the planet long before the last drop of oil is used. We don't need any new deposits.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago
[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Show me a single country capable of extracting this oil who cares. There isn’t one. This is a capitalism problem, not a Russia problem.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 59 points 4 days ago

https://www.worldometers.info/oil/

There are 1.65 trillion barrels of proven oil reserves in the world as of 2016.

So another extra 30% or so.

[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 4 days ago

Yeah, we already have more than enough to ruin the world.

[-] glibg@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Solar is moving so fast, no way this will be economically feasible to draw up. Leave it in the ground!!

[-] RidderSport@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

True, but we will still need it for plastic, just look at temu et cetera

[-] glibg@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

If we stop burning it for energy I think there will be plenty left for plastic without needing to dig new wells.

[-] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Cost more to recycle which is the problem. If it was all biodegradable from plants would be best.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 40 points 4 days ago

It's almost poetic. The oil got there because there was once vegetation on Antarctica, that decayed over the eons. Now the thirst for oil will lead to heating the planet enough to melt the ice again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Triumph@fedia.io 47 points 4 days ago

For comparison, Venezuela has the world's largest oil reserve at 303 billion barrels.

Winter is coming.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 43 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserve

Is THAT why we have an aircraft carrier off the coast?

They've got oil and they're NOT sharing it with rich people?

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago
[-] decipher_jeanne 9 points 3 days ago

I mean to be fair they just don't have the infrastructure to extract it anymore. Economic sanctions since the Obama years have mean that the equipment to extract crude has become hard to maintain.

A graph showing the steep decline of venezuelan oil production since the US economic sanctions

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

Is THAT why we have an aircraft carrier off the coast?

Yes.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

Winter is coming.

More like perpetual summer

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cheeseburger@piefed.ca 39 points 4 days ago

Ffs, just fuck off, Russia.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago

Who put the barrels there!!!

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

Oh for fucks sake.

[-] frezik 25 points 4 days ago

Just for context, the US uses around 7 billion barrels per year. Can keep the SUVs going for the better part of a century.

[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 31 points 4 days ago
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Billionaires caused this

[-] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 15 points 4 days ago

We have been cooked for a while. I don’t think there’s anything after well-done, except burnt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] foodandart@lemmy.zip 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

More to the point, what will the consequences be of that much carbon being repatriated into the atmosphere? I hear that Siberia has had some awfully hot, miserable summers recently. It’s likely not going to go over well with the climate problems Russia is having.

Hmmmm.

[-] standarduser@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 days ago

Hmm sounds like a good reason to have the ice all melt and speed up us dependency on it - USA 2026 probably

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

So, they were looking

[-] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

What’s oil?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
473 points (100.0% liked)

News

33214 readers
2628 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS