1930
Ok, boomer (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Not saying this is wrong but sometimes you need to look in the mirror as well. It's never just one thing. Also, throw away the boomer blame game and refocus on the rich 10%, who are more than just boomers now.

[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 2 points 7 hours ago

It's never worth your time or effort to have a discussion/argument with someone who isn't going to participate in good faith.

[-] comeonitsnotlike@feddit.nu 3 points 10 hours ago

That is spot on. I have just concluded that it isn't my responsibility to educate my parents. And since they don't listen anyway, I also realized that since that is the case, we have not become closer through the years; but actually the opposite. And that all because they're not willing to accept facts, because they're lazy and entitled.

[-] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

I just find these reductive generalisations a bit silly and divisive. As if anyone born between arbitrary years x and y is part of some sort of united collective that can reasonably critique everyone born between years v and w.

[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

They have it backwards. Young people think old people had it easy. This is their justification for not trying. Truth is every generation has it's challenges. Rather than turn to social media for validation, look for information. There's no one-size-fits-all solution for everyone but if you're facing a challenge, someone before you faced the same. Don't listen to those who tell you not to try. Listen to folks who succeeded, what worked, what didn't.

PS The only derogatory I can say about the young generation as a whole is, where the fuck is your rock and roll? You're listening to your grandparent's music. Lame.

[-] FlembleFabber@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

PS The only derogatory I can say about the young generation as a whole is, where the fuck is your rock and roll? You’re listening to your grandparent’s music. Lame.

I think about this all the time, actually. I think part of it is that music is so atomized into a zillion sub-genres, and there doesn't seem to be really big zeitgeist-level types of things. Streaming vs. curating has changed the dynamics back to being more similar to what the boomers started off with, ironically, when they were buying 45's, and before albums became a thing. :)

Anyway, the things that make the really big $$$ all seem rather nutless and uninspiring, if you ask me. Where is the music that might scare the parents?

But then, if you look back at what was charting in a given decade, you might be surprised at how schmaltzy things were way back, too. Look at the Seventies, as a for instance, and see what the top 40 was playing.

[-] n0respect@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Where is the music that might scare the parents?

Phonk was fun in a 2 Fast 2 Furious kind of way. Well, the 5 phonk songs that are good, then everyone else copied those.

Hyperpop is current. It's super-broad and I'm not sure if there is a great definition. Apparently someone called SOPHIE is like a godmother to this genre before she passed away. From my research hyperpop has become an overly broad genre, ranging from maximalist happy-breakcore (which is how I know it) to depressed autotune mumble rap.

SOPHIE might scare you. I"ve been flipping through her singles as I write this. Like hyperpop itself, her style is very varied. But generally breaks from traditional conventions of both pop and edm.

[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

IMO a big factor is that the production quality of music (as well as movies and TV) hit a point where it no longer sounds or looks as dated. Digital remastering cleans up any flaws, now the only tip off to the age is content.

Yeah I'm hip to the schmaltzy tunes of the 70's, I'm a big fan. Looking at you BJ Thomas.

I'm sure there is good rock going on now, it's just not making it into the mainstream. I'm a product of 80's punk rock. It never got mainstream attention but it did spawn acts that did in the 90's.

[-] frezik 26 points 1 day ago

The hardship Boomers had was mostly far away and hypothetical. They grew up with the constant threat of nuclear war.

The old Star Trek episode "Gary Seven" has an interesting take on this. Boomers expected that civilization would end before they got to adulthood. Then it didn't, and they had no idea what to do with themselves.

Then they come to a time when they're resented by both their parents and their children. The Greatest Generation was horny after the war and literally fucked the Boomers into existence, but realized too late that they didn't actually like having children. Boomers treated their children the way their parents treated them. Gen X sorta puts up with it, but Millennials aren't having it.

Other than that, capitalism knew by the 1950s that if they push the working class too hard, they'll revolt. Better to back off the money printer a little to make sure we can keep running it for as long as possible. And so the working class could have a reasonably comfy life doing the same trades for their whole working life (provided they were white). Over time, capitalism found that it can keep a working class revolt from happening by dividing the working class against each other; racism and religion works pretty well. Then it was time to overclock the money printer.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Boomers expected that civilization would end before they got to adulthood.

I figured that was our (Gen X) curse. I remember being fairly sure I'd not see age 20, given all the dystopian nightmares that seemed to surround us. Maybe it was all the boomer-created media we were saturated in.

I seem to recall Douglas Coupland writing on that in much more evocative ways than I could ever muster...but then, even though he coined "Generation X", I think he's one of the very oldest in that generation.

[-] tino@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I'm 45, so not a boomer but already too old to get any respect from people in their 30's (90% of my colleagues for example). Simply speaking about something they didn't experience (reading a map, installing an OS, meeting the love of your life without a dating app...) gets me a "Ok Boomer" each time so what do I do? I just shut the fuck up. I'm not worried, they'll be in my position very quickly.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Send them this. I'm sure they will get it.

[-] Thebular@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Bro, I'm 28 and I feel this way. It's like I became uncool overnight

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

For a community called “LemmyShitPost” there is an awful lot of gold here.

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I guess it's to be expected. Boomers were raised in pure bliss, spent half their lives relatively stress-free. Everything was easy and cheap. When you live an easy life, you get used to being dumb, uninformed and lazy. The same would have probably happened to all zoomers in the same situation.

Note that this is mostly specific to North America, Western Europe, Japan and maybe a few other countries. Pretty much everywhere else boomers aren't all that different from zoomers, save for regular intergenerational differences.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Eh, this seems to be looking at things with rose-colored glasses. That generation, in the prime of their youth, had to worry about getting drafted into going halfway around the world to fight a war of empire, for instance.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I guess it’s to be expected. Boomers were raised in pure bliss, spent half their lives relatively stress-free. Everything was easy and cheap. When you live an easy life, you get used to being dumb, uninformed and lazy. The same would have probably happened to all zoomers in the same situation.

I'm not a boomer, but this isn't quite a fair characterization. Yes, they had cheap college, affordable cars, housing, lots of upward mobility that most of us would love to have today, but they lived through some shit too. Boomers were in their youth when humanity had its closest brush with global nuclear war when the bombers were in the air flying during the Cuban Missile Crisis. They lived everyday with a really good chance the world was going to end in nuclear war. They were the last generation to see a compulsory military draft and many know high school friends that were drafted and died in Vietnam. We think interest rates are bad these days making borrowing expensive. No shit they were having to get mortgages with a minimum of 18% and 19%:

source

This says nothing about the many racial and sexual discrimination issues that those groups faced making basic life even harder. In Canada it wasn't until 1964 that a woman could open her own bank account without her husband's consent. In the USA, redlining preventing people of color from buying homes in better areas denying them untold billions of dollars of generational wealth from real estate appreciation.

Absolutely give the out-of-touch boomers that are dismissive of the problems young people are facing today the shit boomers deserve. They did so much to harvest the benefits of the last century and leave the bill to the younger generations while simultaneously destroying environment for the later generations to thrive the way they did. Just don't forget that each generation has its problems too and there hasn't been a generation yet that has been entirely carefree.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

In Canada it wasn’t until 1964 that a woman could open her own bank account without her husband’s consent.

My mother would always remind me that in the United States, this was not lifted until 1974.

[-] Trev625@sopuli.xyz 4 points 23 hours ago

Just using the interest rate is an unfair comparison. You have to go get median house prices and median incomes as well to make a proper comparison. Just saying the rate was higher at some point is useless if we don't also compare the prices and incomes because what really matters is affordability. Not saying your whole comment is wrong, just trying to say that this particular part seems to be biased in favor of the Boomers.

Median home price to median household income ratio This ratio is a key indicator of housing affordability. It measures how many years of the median household's income are needed to purchase the median-priced home. Period Median Household Income Median Home Price Price-to-Income Ratio 1980 ~$21,000 ~$65,000 ~3.1x 2024 ~$85,000 ~$415,000 ~4.9x Comparison of mortgage payments Even with the high interest rates of the 1980s, the lower home values meant a smaller overall loan and a monthly payment that took up a smaller percentage of the median household income. Here is a side-by-side comparison of a hypothetical mortgage for a median-income household in 1980 and 2024: Mortgage metric Early 1980s 2024 Median income $22,000 $85,000 Median house price $47,000 $415,000 20% down payment $11,000 (~50% of annual income) $83,000 (~98% of annual income) Loan amount $36,000 $332,000 Interest rate 13% 7.5% Monthly payment $397 $2,321 Payment as % of gross income

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Just using the interest rate is an unfair comparison. You have to go get median house prices and median incomes as well to make a proper comparison. Just saying the rate was higher at some point is useless if we don’t also compare the prices and incomes because what really matters is affordability. Not saying your whole comment is wrong, just trying to say that this particular part seems to be biased in favor of the Boomers.

I'd written a big post already, and diving into all the details and nuance was too much to put in the initial post. You're right that the interest rate alone isn't a determining factor, but I'd also disagree that its objectively in favor of Boomers, perhaps subjectively though. Another factor to consider is that in the downpayment requirements. Today we talk about the "best practice" of putting 20% down on a home, but that's today. The alternative of putting less-than 20% down and using PMI didn't even exist as a concept until 1971. It grew in popularity later, but in the early days it wasn't common. Further, with higher interest rates it meant that much lower pay down of the principal was occurring in the first few years of the mortgage because of amortization. It was the beginning of the age of moving more frequently for jobs, which meant less equity build up as each house sale cycle robbed them of that benefit of wealth, arguable the most valuable investment asset of the working class.

Median home price to median household income ratio This ratio is a key indicator of housing affordability

I appreciate you doing and sharing that analysis.

I think we both agree that its difficult to do an absolute comparison on the home buying/owning experience between the Boomer era and today's Millennials (or GenZ) simply because so many conditions are different. We didn't talk about Stagflation or unemployment rate in 1982 being 10.8% compared to today's 4.3%. I pointed out the interest rate being higher because most folks approach new information as "all else being equal" conditions. The audience already knew that housing price was less in the Boomer era, additional it was known that income was higher proportionally to living expenses than today's Millennials (or GenZ), what I doubted was common knowledge was the sky high interest rates compared to today. Thats what I was communicating.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 140 points 1 day ago
[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago

Managed this as a millennial - had absolutely nothing to do with my parents helping pay half my deposit. Nope, absolutely nothing to do with that whatsoever.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Eq0@literature.cafe 167 points 2 days ago

This gives me flashbacks to the one time in my life I really wanted to answer “okay boomer”

My father in law was supporting the claim the climate change might exist, but it’s nothing we have to concern ourselves about because it’s going to take decades to do anything.

And I was like: you have grandkids, they will be there in decades! And: you just experienced the first drought of your country, how is that not climate change??

After half an hour going in rounds I gave up and bit my tongue to not torpedo our relationship. Two years later he admitted that maybe there was something about climate change nowadays…

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 111 points 2 days ago

Decades ago my stepmother did this in front of her 8 year old daughter... I was like, ok you'll be dead, and you don't need to care about me as your stepson, but what about her?

Ughh... Now her and my dad are MAGA...

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 101 points 2 days ago

The secret ingredient is lead poisoning. The Baby Boomer generation spent over half their lives sniffing leaded gasoline fumes.

[-] uriel238 1 points 14 hours ago

Gen X kid walked arduous hikes uphill back from school in the La Cañada foothills in San Fernando Valley, id est, the Los Angeles smog bowl from ~1975 to 1985. I may literally have lead poisoning brain damage.

I don't know how I'd get checked. 58 now.

Curiously, I empathize with kids these days but am also extremely left-wing, and see each generation getting dismissed by the previous one as having it too easy.

[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

I do not dismiss the next generation as having it too easy. Their minimum wage is what mine was when I young. They are basically in a ponzi scheme economy. They are either going to have to endure this distopia or violently overthrow it.

[-] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago

Ding ding ding!

The reason it feels like people from that era are angrier and dumber than they used to be is because they literally are! It’s literal brain damage!

[-] StewNasty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, turns out that lead in gasoline ain't so great for the brain. I remember being oddly fascinated the first time I saw the correlation of lead being pulled from gas and violent crime plummeting 30 years later. You can see it in graphs from all across the world and can damn near set your watch to it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

oskibi doomer

[-] Kayday@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I was told the other day by someone younger than me that saying "okay boomer" is cringe now. The new hot hip fan-didly-tastic slang is "unc status" or "aunt status", apparently. Means the same thing, but in sleek Gen-Z packaging.

[-] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago

Okay zoomer.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago

I feel like there is always some level of condescension when talking about other generations of slang and I wonder why. There's a smack of snark to the redundant duplicated repetition of "hot hip fan-didly-tastic" and "sleek Gen-Z packaging", and "cringe" is obviously derogatory. Can't we casually accept that "the new slang is" what it is, and set an example for the younger ones in turn?

Couldn't contemporary colloquialisms coexist comfortably?

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago

I love using the new slang. It makes my kid turn red, which I find hilarious.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 days ago

I feel like it's more bleeding into, ok x-er now.

Not to say that all of Gen X's like this, but I'm definitely seeing some of the older ranks falling into this sort of behavior

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My GenX dad sure did shut the fuck up about the job market and economy once he had to find a new one. He gave up and retired after working a handful of shitty ones after he got laid off the good job.

[-] gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 2 days ago

My GenX dad calling me and complaining about how much Indeed sucked for finding jobs was extremely validating.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] hannahbelles@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

It's definitely based on where you live... Whether you get a USDA backed loan, etc... I financed my house, 15 yrs ago when rates were between 3 and 6 percent. 2200sqft 3br, 2 bath, with half finished basement on a half acre, and deeded lake access point (Lake Norman) they wanted 120K, but I talked them down to 100K. Since it's out in the country ( about 15 minutes from the city), it qualified for USDA, which means no closing costs, 30 year FIXED RATE. I pay $650 a month for my mortgage...Only downside is that it was built in 1973, but there are so many houses out here like this, just sitting...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
1930 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35332 readers
3432 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS