297
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 117 points 3 days ago

"Check where my people are going so that I might lead them there."

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 56 points 3 days ago

Exactly. This wasn't an endorsement, it was a concession.

That is a great expression. Is that a quote?

[-] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

It’s used in The West Wing. Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandre_Auguste_Ledru-Rollin suggests it’s not really something he said

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think it's one of those apocryphal quotes that gets misattributed to different people. Most commonly Ledru-Rollin, as Pumpkin Escobar mentioned.

[-] immutable@lemmy.zip 77 points 3 days ago

The reason Dems are doing this is clear.

If Mamdani wins they can go “we endorsed him, he won because of the backing of the party”

If Mamdani loses they can go “see, we told you that we need to pivot further right. We told you. We didn’t sabotage him, we endorsed him for goodness sake”

Withhold endorsement and throw mud in the water all the way up to the end then try to slap a last minute endorsement on there so they can absolve themselves of any blame and pretend like the “time to vote left is the primaries” like they won’t ratfuck you after you win the primary.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

too late bitch you take your $1.7M blood money and fuck off forever

[-] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

well to be fair to i have limited power, if I had more I'd happily help him fuck off in person.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

What do you mean? It helped me

[-] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 3 days ago

About fkn time. Not that Zohran needed his endorsement. Hakeem I imagine is covering his ass now but will do everything he can behind the scenes to oppose him.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 29 points 3 days ago
[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Exactly my thoughts.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 32 points 3 days ago

No one should care who Democrats endorse. The fact that Jeffries waited this late makes him out to be another bandwagon liberal trying to hitch his horse to the guaranteed winner, as if he supported him all along

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago
[-] oxysis 10 points 3 days ago

59 minutes, 59 seconds and 999 milliseconds

[-] frezik 20 points 3 days ago

I said a month ago that last minute endorsements don't count, and the window closes in mid-October. I see no reason to change this. Jefferies can get bent.

https://lemmy.world/post/36326117/19557020

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Once Zohran win is assured?

[-] JaymesRS@piefed.world 17 points 3 days ago

My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over

[-] devolution@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

You're late.

[-] marietta_man@feddit.nl 5 points 3 days ago

Great! We need to unite to get the fascists the fuck out!

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

About damn time

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Bullying Works

Did he send a strong worded letter?

[-] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

Finally decided to bend the knee. What a loser.

[-] frankiehollywood@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

Sounds about right….

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
297 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26192 readers
2267 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS