900
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by cows_are_underrated@feddit.org to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 30p87@feddit.org 78 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Gimme the repo and I'll get it to compile on Arch, latest testing packages as per 2025-10-20T22:12:00 on repo.30p87.de/archlinux

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 100 points 5 days ago

What colors are your thigh highs?

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 84 points 5 days ago

Black-white, preferably pink-white. I overcompensate a lot for boymoding.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago

It's too funny to me that Arch of all distributions attracts the thigh /Unix socks crowd (for lack of better word). Nothing about Arch stands out for me in that regard, there's no social statement or anything, and when I was more active in the community, it wasn't known for that.

I was deep enough into Arch to run my own private repository using aurutils, but no thighs :(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

This is why you use Arch/Nix because the package is likely in their repos.

The software probably still won't work, but you can waste more time on it.

[-] ian@feddit.uk 6 points 3 days ago

As a non IT person I find Linux way better for installing software. The sort of apps non IT people use. The Software store has most of what I need. There rest I install the Windows way. From a website. Apps with a Linux version almost always detect and offer a Linux button to click to install. I wouldn't know what to do if that didn't work. Ditch that application I guess. My distros are pretty standard. Not hacked about. My apps are not too weird. I've been doing it this way for 14+ years. Never needed the CLI either.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 55 points 5 days ago

Both of these two cases are why Flatpaks are so attractive.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 30 points 5 days ago

Flatpaks are better than Snaps, but properly maintained dependency trees and SBOMs are best, by a wide margin.

[-] bigboitricky@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

PopOS fucked me up with flatpaks

Gateway drug

[-] prole 5 points 4 days ago

They take up so much fucking space though

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago

I'm going to be honest to you, I prefer appimages.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

I respect your wrong opinion

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago

I rarely encounter them. But they usually work when I do. But, ugh, they're just kinda gross. Like, is this a .exe? No thank you. Don't give me windows trauma.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] JamBandFan1996@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago

God bless flatpak for these cases

[-] ragas@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago

No System Package

Build System Package

Gentoo makes it soo easy.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

I honestly can't remember the last time I've come across a package that I needed that so obscure that it wasn't found somewhere as at the very least an appimage, if not a flatpak. I haven't had to build from source in I don't even know how many years now.

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago

What? Its something I do quite regularly.

[-] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 6 points 4 days ago

Try making music on Linux. You'll be compiling obscure shit and tweaking configs all the time.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

True. But I was coming at if from the perspective of an every day user coming from Windows. email, word processing, internet, etc... Even gaming and photo editing.

The more professional the needed software gets, of course the more obscure it gets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 23 points 5 days ago

Last week was the first time I think I've ever got a random Internet tarball to configure, make and make install. Program even did what it was supposed to too. I was amazed.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Glad im not the only one. Thats one thing that makes me go man, people will never leave windows for this, this is insanely complex to juat install a program.

I find it fun to learn tho

[-] reddifuge@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Windows; have to search online for correct website, sift through ads to find the download, install while avoiding malware or extra programs that try to install alongside.

Linux; Sudo pacman -S firefox. Done

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

This is true for some but it doesn't work like that in reality. Its much easier to install on windows vs linux, thats just how it is.

Don't even get started on flatpak vs .Deb vs compiling vs snap...explaining that to a windows user makes them about lose their mind.

Windows wins here. Click exe. Install. Done. AND the benefit of being allowed to install to a different hard drive, which linux will not allow without a ton of hoop jumping.

Linux is great but let's not pretend windows doesn't do certain things much better.

Also, not being able to see all your installed programs in one place because they are a blend of .Deb, snap, flatpaks, and compiled. It becomes a mess very quick if youre not careful.

[-] reddifuge@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It does work like that in reality for almost all programs.

For obscure stuff you can use yay or whatever other user repository you want.

yay "program name". Done

I've been doing this for years without issue.

Also you can list all your installed programs. On Arch it's pacman -Q and yay -Qm.

It's so easy a baby could do it. And apparently arch is supposed to be the most difficult.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

if you use any modern distro installing most software is braindead easy. if you have to compile something yourself (which isnt that often) it can get quite funny because one hell of a lot can go wrong.

[-] Meowie_Gamer@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip 21 points 5 days ago

If it’s in the AUR you can use a arch distrobox container

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bstix@feddit.dk 20 points 5 days ago

The last picture in the meme always bothered me, because the sequence doesn't make any sense physically. (Popping the rake from mid air and doing the wrong flip and such)

So, I went on to find the sequence that I believe it was drawn from.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

you think the sequence doesn't make physical sense, but skateboarding on a rake is fine?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

Things have gotten so, so much better over the last 5 or 6 years.

Flatpak, appimage, docker are just brilliant.

I recently discovered nix and am in that honeymoon phase of trying to hit every nail with that hammer.

[-] gerowen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Flatpak/flathub is your friend. I've been using Linux for 20+ years and I'm to a point where if it's not available as a deb, flatpak, system package or at the bare minimum an executable binary/script I just don't bother. Compiling should be done by the software vendor and not required of the user unless they specifically want or need to.

[-] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

When the dependencies need dependencies and then those dependencies need dependencies, the rabbit hole is endless!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

no system package

install distro that has it on a chroot

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah sure, I gonna setup everything again just because a single piece of software is not available on my pc

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

All I see when I see this is "Linux isn't quite ready for prime time".

Hopefully it gets less and less true.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

I don't see that at all. This meme is referring to some niche application or to a person with their fingers all up in the nuts and bolts of their OS.

It's common for beginner-friendly desktop distros to have Firefox and LibreOffice installed out of the box. For mainstream use that covers the vast majority.

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

This isnt true. You only have this problem with rather obscure software (which was what I tried to install)

[-] nroth@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

No, then you fix the code to work with your current system libraries and upstream the patch and version bump. This happens less on Arch, BTW ;-)

[-] juipeltje@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Bruh just use nix, flatpak or appimage 🗿 (we don't talk about snaps)

[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 22 points 5 days ago

"Just use Flatpak."

"But that will use 2GB when a system package will use 34MB."

"Duh, it's not 2GB total. Flatpaks share dependencies."

"I don't have any other Flatpaks on my system."

"..."

"..."

"OK, so it'll be 2GB. Your next one will be smaller, though."

"If I install one and if it shares any dependencies with the first one."

"Pff. You're just a hater."

"Yeah, I hate that something that should be small is using 2GB of space."

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

“Just use Flatpak.”

“But that will use 2GB when a system package will use 34MB. Yeah, I hate that something that should be small is using 2GB of space.”

"The space consumption isn't my preference either, but I'd rather be using the app than fighting dependencies. I wish you luck with your dependency chain then."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] angband@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

pfft. ln -s new_library.4.4.7 old_library.4.2.8

all done!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] highball@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

LMAO, back in my Slackware days (3.4, 3.6, 4.0, 7.0), If I had to build from source, which was most things, step1: ./configure step2: install the missing package step3: goto step1 until no missing packages identified step4: make step5: make install

Sometimes my packages were too old, So I would just go to step1 for each package that also needed to be newer. I'm not even a Linux Expert, and I definitely wasn't a Linux Expert then. All the building from source helps me jump into software projects and become productive real quick though.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago
[-] pageflight@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

*accidentally uninstalls python base package trying to fix dependency conflicts in apt

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
900 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

27821 readers
708 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS