389
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu angered Palestinians and their defenders Friday after presenting a map of "The New Middle East" without Palestine during his speech to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

Speaking to a largely empty chamber, Netanyahu—whose far-right government is widely considered the most extreme in Israeli history—showed a series of maps, including one that did not show the West Bank, East Jerusalem, or Gaza. These Palestinian territories have been illegally occupied by Israel since 1967, with the exception of Gaza—from which Israeli forces withdrew in 2005, while maintaining an economic stranglehold over the densely populated coastal strip.

Middle East Eyereported Netanyahu also held up a map of "Israel in 1948"—the year the modern Jewish state was established, largely through the ethnic cleansing of more than 750,000 Arabs—that erroneously included the Palestinian territories as part of Israel.

Palestinian Ambassador to Germany Laith Arafeh said on social media that there is "no greater insult to every foundational principle of the United Nations than seeing Netanyahu display before the UNGA a 'map of Israel' that straddles the entire land from the river to the sea, negating Palestine and its people, then attempting to spin the audience with rhetoric about 'peace' in the region, all the while entrenching the longest ongoing belligerent occupation in today's world."

As Middle East Eye noted:

The inclusion of Palestinian lands (and sometimes land belonging to Syria and Lebanon) in Israeli maps is common among believers of the concept of Eretz Yisrael—Greater Israel—a key part of ultra-nationalist Zionism that claims all of these lands belong to a Zionist state.

Earlier this year, Netanyahu's finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, spoke from a podium adorned with a map that also included Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria as part of Greater Israel. In the same event, he said there was "no such thing as Palestinians."

The use of such maps by Israeli officials comes at a time when Netanyahu's ultra-nationalist government has taken steps that experts say amount to the "de jure annexation" of the occupied West Bank.

Netanyahu used the maps in an attempt to illustrate the increasing number of Arab countries normalizing relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords brokered by the administration of former U.S. President Donald Trump.

"There's no question the Abraham Accords heralded the dawn of a new age of peace," the Israeli prime minister said. "But I believe that we are at the cusp of an even more dramatic breakthrough, an historic peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia will truly create a new Middle East."

ritics have countered that peace between apartheid Israel and Arab dictatorships has come at the cost of advancing Palestinian rights. In the case of Morocco, the United States recognized the North African nation's illegal annexation and brutal occupation of Western Sahara in exchange for normalization with Israel.

Netanyahu's props on Friday reminded numerous observers of the time during his 2012 General Assembly speech when he used a cartoon drawing of a bomb to illustrate Iran's progress on advancing a nuclear weapons program that both U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies said did not exist.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] shmooomaru@lemmy.world 135 points 1 year ago

It's funny how Israel is doing their own ethnic cleansing bit

[-] demonquark@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago

There’s basically one far right playbook. Did you really think Netanyahu would change tactics just because he happened to be a Jewish right winger.

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

There only being that one playbook is the exact reason why I have a patch on my backpack that reads: "Evil is boring"

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 1 year ago

Of all the things that the Jews have learned from their history, you'd think "genocide is bad" would be one of the first and most important ones...

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 42 points 1 year ago

It's not genocide if the others are not real humans! And Palestinians can't possibly be real humans, if they're against the Israeli Reich!

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Many have. And then there's the far right.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

And unfortunately the world is doing nothing to stop them achieving their goal. No sanctions, no political isolation, no international outcry.

It just comes to prove how wicked international politics is and clearly showing the double standards there, where our allies are good no matter what they do. And believe me, if something like this was happening in Russia, China the reaction of the West would have been completely different. And no, I am not defending any of the sides for their wrongdoings, I am just triggered by the hypocrisy.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, it happens in China...

[-] fbmac@lemmy.fbmac.net 4 points 1 year ago

I guess the Arab countries that oppose them are doing something, but Israel have some powerful friends

[-] clanginator@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are the arab countries doing something? I've been educating myself on the situation, and historically the other Arab countries' support has been very limited, at best. This has largely been due to the US' influence on the region and players like the Saudis not wanting to upset their relationship with the US, despite their public proclamations of support for their Arab brothers and sisters.

But I'm also not very informed on the current state of things, so perhaps support has increased in recent years?

[-] fbmac@lemmy.fbmac.net 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not well informed, but sometimes there are some news headline like "Iran Bans Weightlifter for Life Over Handshake With Israeli"

To be fair, I don't recall anyone with reasonable arguments and approach doing something strong against them. I think all reasonable countries want to be on the good side of the USA

[-] clanginator@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah okay. The book I read went through 2017, and I don't really know of trustworthy news sources to keep up with current events in that region.

Yeah the political posturing like getting upset over handshakes is nothing new (altho AFAIK that kinda support has increased in recent years) but as far as actual substantial support, it has often been quite hard for Palestine to get it. (for many reasons)

[-] Gazumi@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

what's hilarious is.... you know how everybody would respond if somebody showed a map without Israel on the map... the accusations of antisemitism would be swift, angry and quite probably violent.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Also, as isn't brought up as often as it should, Palestinians are also semitic peoples. So being against them is also antisemitism.

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

The accusations would also be accurate. Just because Netanyahu is saying some batshit insane thing again doesn't mean antisemetic fuckers get a pass.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

Israel in its current form absolutely shouldn't exist though. We should be against ethnostates as a rule.

[-] UrbonMaximus@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I see this said a lot and it always confuses me. Wouldn't an independent Palestine also be an ethno state?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nope. Israeli law actively discriminates against non-Jews to the benefit of Jews, and the Israeli government government gives so much preferential treatment to Jews outside the law (mostly by taking away the rights of non-Jews) it's not even funny. AFAIK neither of the two Palestinian states that currently exist do that. I mean they discriminate against Jews, but not to the benefit of any particular ethnicity.

[-] UrbonMaximus@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

In an area full of ethnocracies, authoritarian regimes and dictatorships,I doubt that a free Palestinian state wouldn't be one as well. After years of persecution from Lebanon, Syria, Israel, Jordan, Egypt.. A free Palestinian state would most likely copy the Israeli model and make a refuge for all Palestinians of the world. I'm interested to hear why you think it wouldn't be an ethno state.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

In an area full of ethnocracies, authoritarian regimes and dictatorships

The area is full of authoritarian regimes, but ethnocracies? Where are those?

A free Palestinian state would most likely copy the Israeli model and make a refuge for all Palestinians of the world.

I mean the "free" part is pretty dubious but there are already two Palestinian states and it doesn't seem they're interested in going down that route. Also considering being Palestinian an ethnicity is already pretty dubious when the Palestinian identity evolved as a response to Zionism in the 20th century. The factors that led to Israel being in its current state simply don't exist for Palestinians.

[-] UrbonMaximus@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The area is full of authoritarian regimes, but ethnocracies? Where are those?

Lebanon, Turkey..

I mean the "free" part is pretty dubious but there are already two Palestinian states and it doesn't seem they're interested in going down that route. Also considering being Palestinian an ethnicity is already pretty dubious when the Palestinian identity evolved as a response to Zionism in the 20th century. The factors that led to Israel being in its current state simply don't exist for Palestinians.

I would argue that we can't really know because Palestinian states are not really free states - they don't have an army, don't have their own monetary system, limited foreign trade, Israel and other international bodies control it's borders, Jordan controls it's religious sites, etc.

I also disagree with how you characterise the Palestinian identity, but we can ignore that for the sake of discussion. According to 2018 statistics - West Bank: 72% Arab (Sunni), 28% Jewish. (We can ignore the Jewish number as is mostly in eat Jerusalem) Gaza: 98%-99% Arab (Sunni) Both have less than 1% Other.

But if you want to insist that they have a functional government(s) at the moment, then their demographics are worst than Israel's. And I can't see how it's not an ethno state.

What kind of policies do the Palestinian authorities offer to attract minorities?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Lebanon, Turkey…

Yeah fair point about Turkey, but is Lebanon an ethnostate?

I would argue that we can’t really know because Palestinian states are not really free states

I mean you can call Gaza a lot of things, but they're free in the domestic politics sense. As in nobody can really tell them what to do with their people because they're already cut off from the world by Israel.

But if you want to insist that they have a functional government(s) at the moment, then their demographics are worst than Israel’s. And I can’t see how it’s not an ethno state.

An ethnostate isn't just a state compromised of one ethnicity; it's a state that's meant for one ethnicity. Like, Germany is an ethnostate, for example. And then Israel takes that to another level by creating laws that favor that ethnicity. While most developed ethnostates have abandoned their ethnocentric roots, Israel actively embraces them. That's not how a modern state should be, as it compromises equality between citizens from the get-go.

Oh and also, while Arab is a collective identity, it's not an ethnicity. There are things you can call ethnicities within the Arab world (Egyptian, for example), but Arab itself is more of an umbrella term for native Arabic speakers.

What kind of policies do the Palestinian authorities offer to attract minorities?

No no that's not the level we're talking about. Jewish law actively favors Jews over non-Jews. Does any Palestinian state have something like that? A state that does nothing has that beat.

[-] UrbonMaximus@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I mean you can call Gaza a lot of things, but they're free in the domestic politics sense. As in nobody can really tell them what to do with their people because they're already cut off from the world by Israel.

And Egypt.

Oh and also, while Arab is a collective identity, it's not an ethnicity. There are things you can call ethnicities within the Arab world (Egyptian, for example), but Arab itself is more of an umbrella term for native Arabic speakers.

This is incorrect. There's a scientific consensus of nationality, ethnicity and identity. Arabs are an ethnicity. Egyptian are a nationality. I gave you demographical statistics, you can check them yourself - they clearly state Palestinian Arab (Sunni) - nationality ethnicity (identity). I've dropped the Palestinian part because of your previous comment.

An ethnostate isn't just a state compromised of one ethnicity; it's a state that's meant for one ethnicity. Like, Germany is an ethnostate, for example. And then Israel takes that to another level by creating laws that favor that ethnicity. While most developed ethnostates have abandoned their ethnocentric roots, Israel actively embraces them. That's not how a modern state should be, as it compromises equality between citizens from the get-go.

This whole paragraph makes no sense. You use the same criteria but apply it differently as you see fit.

No no that's not the level we're talking about. Jewish law actively favors Jews over non-Jews. Does any Palestinian state have something like that? A state that does nothing has that beat.

I didn't see any facts to prove otherwise. There's a reason why Palestinian minorities like the Palestinian Druze, Baha'i, etc. live outside of the Palestinian authorities - like Israel or Lebanon.

I was wondering if Ethno state actually means anything. But it seems to be just a buzz word that people use. Either that, or people conflate it with apartheid.

If you said that Israel is an apartheid state, I would agree with you. When there's no difference in other countries, to say ethno state is hypocritical at best... or straight on antisemitic.

I'll give you the benefit of a doubt and assume that you just confused your terms and meant apartheid.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And Egypt.

Yeah true enough.

This is incorrect. There’s a scientific consensus of nationality, ethnicity and identity.

No no, Egyptian is a nationality and an ethnicity. Quick reminder that Egyptians have shared a collective identity for 6000+ years. And to correct myself earlier, Arab is also an ethnicity, but one that only applies to people from the Arabian peninsula. As an Egyptian I certainly wouldn't say I share an ethnicity with someone from, say, Qatar.

This whole paragraph makes no sense. You use the same criteria but apply it differently as you see fit.

How so?

I didn’t see any facts to prove otherwise. There’s a reason why Palestinian minorities like the Palestinian Druze, Baha’i, etc. live outside of the Palestinian authorities - like Israel or Lebanon.

I didn't say Palestine didn't have discrimination. I just said that ethnic discrimination there wasn't baked into the law.

If you said that Israel is an apartheid state, I would agree with you. When there’s no difference in other countries, to say ethno state is hypocritical at best… or straight on antisemitic.

Now that I looked up the definition, what I was talking about was basically Apartheid, but I was talking more about the philosophy behind the policies that make it an Apartheid. So to rephrase myself earlier, Israel sees itself as the land of the Jews, not the land of Israelis, and bakes that view into law. Therefore any non-Jewish Israeli is automatically disadvantaged, creating an Apartheid state.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying they wouldn't be. But... particularly among american evangelicals... the response is extremely disproportionate. for them, just because it's israel... and they want to end the world (yeah. nutters think that the end times will only happen if Israel exists as a state...) netanyahu gets a free pass. in fact, if they see this, they'll probably start accusing me of being antisemitic just for criticizing a secular head of state for being a prick.

[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 year ago

This is really dark.

I'm honestly kind of shocked, Because I'm convinced that the two-state solution is dead, and the only two remaining options are the one-state solution -- Israel recognizes Palestinians as Israelis and affords them civil rights and political agency -- or the 'no-state' solution -- expulsion and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the territory.

I know that Netanyahu isn't alluding to the one state solution, so when he stops talking about a two-state solution it really makes it clear that he's going all in on the other one.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

The final one?

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

I read a book called the olive grove when i was a teenager about the true struggles of a palestian family when isreal took over. Its such a sad and messed up story that spans three generations. Ever since reading it ive been pro palestine. For anyone who loves reading should give it a try.

[-] jcit878@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

what is it with countries and bullshit maps lately

[-] Javi_in_4k@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Boycott divest sanction

[-] hark@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Can't you see that israel needs this lebensraum?

[-] firewyre@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Stop electing this fucking assclown.

[-] lorty@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Guess they are tired of pretending their policies are different.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

I'm more puzzled about Sudan. What are these maps about, what's "New Middle East"? I looked up articles about the speech but they don't really clarify the deal about Sudan

[-] svellere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Egypt and Sudan have a border dispute.

More than that, though, Sudan is an Arab-majority state. Many Arab countries have not recognized Israel as a legitimate state. This is basically Israel's attempt at getting recognition from those countries which historically fail to recognize it, improve relations, and solve border disputes between said countries.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
389 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38979 readers
1884 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS