52
submitted 1 day ago by lunatique@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I'm turning 41, but I don't feel like celebrating.

Our generation is running out of time to save the free Internet built for us by our fathers.

What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control.

Once-free countries are introducing dystopian measures such as digital IDs (UK), online age checks (Australia), and mass scanning of private messages (EU).

Germany is persecuting anyone who dares to criticize officials on the Internet. The UK is imprisoning thousands for their tweets. France is criminally investigating tech leaders who defend freedom and privacy.

A dark, dystopian world is approaching fast - while we're asleep. Our generation risks going down in history as the last one that had freedoms -and allowed them to be taken away.

We've been fed a lie.

We've been made to believe that the greatest fight of our generation is to destroy everything our forefathers left us: tradition, privacy, sovereignty, the free market, and free speech.

By betraying the legacy of our ancestors, we've set ourselves on a path toward self-destruction - moral, intellectual, economic, and ultimately biological.

So no, I'm not going to celebrate today. I'm running out of time. We are running out of time.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Even if you don't like the guy, I think it's worth reading what he has to say. And you can agree with what he says and go on not liking him.

[-] dwt@feddit.org 3 points 18 hours ago

Now, if there only was a software one could control, that could be made to offer real good privacy and encryption…..

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah telegram isn't the best. They need encryption by default in private group chats and personal one on ones even without secret chat activated But the point is people need to stop the government censorship. Only if their were people who weren't slaves that could demand and force the government to stop egregious practices, instead of trying to be smartasses online

[-] dwt@feddit.org 1 points 12 hours ago

You‘re not wrong. But all of that needs private, trustworthy software…

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 1 day ago

My message to Telegram CEO: Open source your shit and we'll talk then about freedom and whatever marketing campaing you are on right now. Bye.

[-] bamboo 27 points 1 day ago

I don't see why the CEO of Telegram is concerned about laws about scanning of private messages since the vast majority of the communication on Telegram is unencrypted.

[-] unexpected@forum.guncadindex.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That and the need of an android or iphone in order to create an account.... ;[

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

You sheep are too attach to the people. The message is the point

[-] lumen@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah the message is only half right.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A billionaire, with millions of followers. It's useful for people to see the message and start understanding what is happening.

[-] lumen@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago
[-] ushmel@piefed.world 20 points 1 day ago

The guy who made bank on Russian suppression of communication: "Europe is the problem."

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The UK is imprisoning thousands for their tweets.

What an absolute loads of bollocks.

There has recently been 1 woman jailed for her tweets where she admitted to inciting violence, not because of free speech issues.

These libertarian wankers love citing that sole case (and make out that it's "thousands, I tell ya!") but will overlook that several Just Stop Oil protesters were jailed for 4 years just for holding a zoom call and anti-genocide protesters are being arrested and charged with terrorism offences just for writing on a bit of cardboard.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

So just do ignore all the news reports and video of citizens filming the cops coming to arrest them over tweets. You people are so sheepish

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And if you paid any attention to those reports, you would know that the vast majority are where those people have been critical of the UK or other govts actions, especially surrounding Palestine and none have gone further with the exception of Asa Winstanley. The only reason the police have visited those people is because zionist like complaining about nothing until they get their own way.

The one that the commentor here was responding to was a clear case of inciting violence. The same with people like the constantly crashing out Graham Lineham, who was arrested by police because he was inciting violence against a protected class.

So while the UK govt is infringing on peoples free speech, its not the ones who are getting all the publicity. Theyre just a bunch of whining fuckwits who want to be able to threaten people without consequence.

Please do try to keep abreast of the situation rather than stomping in with big boots and looking like a fucking idiot.

[-] socialsecurity@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

she admitted to inciting violence

Why would she admit something like that... This sounds sus. You got a link?

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago
[-] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Interesting... 2 years for an idiotic post. Interesting use of taxpayer money.

But these people allow pedos go free and live their best lives

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"An idiotic post"

She was inciting people to burn down hotels housing vulnerable people. Some of those padeos you bleat about were at the protests while 60% of those arrested at a protest in Bristol have form as domestic abusers

Yes, all about protecting women and kids.

[-] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am not sure what point you are trying to make here.

Pedos should be in prison or dead.

uK is like US a place where they got to live their best lives tho

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I am not sure what point you are trying to make here.

You should ask that of yourself. Youre the one who brought up paedos. Maybe you get all too muddled in your head and cant make a salient point?

[-] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Wasting resources to police speech in a country over ran with pedos like Andrew is clown behaviour

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

If you're having trouble stringing a sentence together, feel free to draw a picture with crayons.

[-] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Who hurt you?

[-] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Only the rich ones that can fly on private jets to far islands.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

It's not his n first post you dolt.

[-] lumen@feddit.nl 12 points 1 day ago

What I found most alarming about this whole thing: this post showed up in the Telegram app for me, in a banner. I don’t follow Durov’s channel. He decided to push it to every Telegram client regardless of whether they’re following him.

[-] gesshoku@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Mine looks weird 😄

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

This isn't true. I did not receive it at all. I found this on a news website that basically screenshotted his post. Then I extracted the text and posted it here

[-] lumen@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

Okay well, I did. It was on the iOS Telegram client, US phone number. Maybe Pavel pushed it only to certain clients.

[-] Corridor8031@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

what is up with this batshit insane post, i know this was written by some right wing facist, people like you are the reason it is like this

[-] alerich@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago

Germany is what? Also the EU voted against chat control.

I partly agree with your point, but please state the facts precisely.

[-] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 9 points 1 day ago

Also the EU voted against chat control.

They did not. It was just removed from the agenda for now.

[-] alerich@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

OK, I didn't know. But my point still is that we don't have it (yet).

this was the dude arrested because he let drug trafficking and csam go unchecked on telegram.... so naturally it makes sense that he'll lurch rightward.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

He is not responsible for the user uploads. Telegram deletes illegal activity. If it's a private group they don't know what's happening. CSAM has been on YouTube and they do little about it. But your masters didn't tell you to hate Google yet.

it's his service; he's absolutely responsible or it. he was arrested because he DIDN'T do anything about it.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

He was arrested because he didn't stop people from having freedom of speech. He wasn't and hasn't been found guilty of anything.

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

posessing csam is not "freedom of speech".

nevermind the fact that telegram repeatedly refused to join child protection against csam groups to address the problem of csam on their service.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Are you stupid on purpose? I'm saying thats the real reason they arrested him. They wanted to censor freedom of speech. Not scam

its everyone elses fault that he let csam unchecked on his app?

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

It's the people who posted it fault. You think that one human can read everyone's messages lol? They would need to spy on everyone and have millions of employees specifically looking for illegal activity.

People are so righteous but have done nothing to ensure that the Epstein files were revealed.

and the people who posted it were given the platform by telegram and their ceo who did nothing to help fight csam and child exploitation.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I know one thing. If I had a platform I wouldn't be responsible for my users post. All these other CEOs have liability protection. It's a double standard

[-] bamboo 3 points 1 day ago

If it’s a private group they don’t know what’s happening

This is not true, group chats with more than two members on Telegram are NEVER encrypted. Telegram admins have full access to see the contents of these private chats, and have the ability to respond to court orders, but they were ignoring those requests. This is why he was arrested. Google/YouTube respond to court orders and do take stuff down, and actual encrypted messengers like Signal have no way to see the contents of the messages, which is why the owners and operators of these services have never been arrested.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

They aren't encrypted, hence why I never said they were. This is something your cooked mind imagined so you can argue with yourself.

Private Groups: Only members can see messages. Admins cannot view messages unless they are part of the conversation.

This means if "Crimegroup" has shady stuff in the group if no member snitched it wouldn't be known for them to even delete it. While telegram (the company or workers) could look right in they would need to know it's an illegal group first because luckily they aren't spying on everyone by default

[-] bamboo 4 points 1 day ago

If messages aren't end to end encrypted, then their contents of the messages can be intercepted by Telegram or any adversary who has access to Telegram's systems. This is what the US Government was doing with Prism to suck in unencrypted data from ISPs without their knowledge. By not having end to end encryption, you have to trust that Telegram administrators are being truthful when they say they're not looking at your messages, and that their systems are never compromised by crimegroups or nation states without Telegram's knowledge.

[-] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

True. It is a trust thing. Thats why I don't trust telegram for privacy. But I use it to follow groups

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

42452 readers
437 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS