1155
submitted 10 months ago by exu@feditown.com to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ninjabard@lemmy.world 220 points 10 months ago
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 24 points 10 months ago

~~Vulnerable~~ Susceptible

[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 183 points 10 months ago

I think they're less "vulnerable" and more "fragile"

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 28 points 10 months ago

"Afraid of any sort of accountability"

[-] railway692@piefed.zip 160 points 10 months ago

Oh? Are we giving them privacy?

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 109 points 10 months ago

if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, maybe it would be in our interests to make all government communications public access. If it isn't a matter happening outside our borders, have it open. Maybe a classification for certain discussions that requires they be released in a timely manner, and when reviewed by a 3rd party if any information is attempted to be hidden they are immediately removed from their position and an investigation starts as to whether the offense should be criminal.

The timely manner would have to be monitored as in "we are going to performing a drug raid" they get a warrant that allocates them 2 days to have discussions pertaining to that topic, organize and execute it. Then release all communications immediately following. If they don't believe they can perform it in that time they need to submit it in their warrant request as to the reason why, time period, and date the information will be made public.

If we wrote strict laws on it, the judges would be held accountable for giving out warrants brazenly, and the executive branch would be kept in check by such

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago

Maybe we should consider some sort of informational freedom act.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 125 points 10 months ago

Federated solutions which can't be stopped, self hosted, and available via Fdroid.

Only real answer.

[-] wagesj45@fedia.io 91 points 10 months ago

Until Google revokes publishing privileges for side-loading applications. I think we'll have to go further and get used to making PWAs and regular websites.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 84 points 10 months ago

side-loading

You mean "installing normally." "Sideloading" is fucking anti-property-rights loaded language.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 32 points 10 months ago

Good point. Wild how these ghouls have normalized their bullshit language.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 102 points 10 months ago

Oh no, vulnerable 🥺 they need DEI? They need to be a protected class? 🥺

Surveillance is suddenly wrong when it's the peasants surveiling wannabe samurai? 🥺

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Can I just be "that guy" and point out the CEO of Google is "Sundar Puchai"?

Who do you think Trump is coming for, you fucking idiot? It's not guys like me named "David".

I hate this. I hate that they are targeting "minorities", or Hispanics, or Indian folks... But many people in charge who are part of these groups don't even care. They think they are special. You're money doesn't make you immune, you complete goddamn waste of oxygen.

We're trying to fucking help you. Stop condemning fellow human beings for the sake of profits. You are damning your children, and your family. You are selling them for gains. We hate you, and so do your children.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 74 points 10 months ago

The irony is so rich.

To anyone that had doubts about governments putting restrictions on app stores, here is your proof. The level of power the current situation grants this duopoly is excessive and dangerous.

[-] possumparty 45 points 10 months ago

I thought we had all the proof we needed when Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai were snuggling up to Trump at dinners and the inauguration

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

google had been snuggling up to conservatives for a while, mostly around mid-pandemic, when they removed restrictions on not banning election denial, and then snowballed into right wing propaganda videos plaguing youtube ever since. they are part of the problem, even moreso than APPLE. and google recently made deals WITH ISRAEL to allow thier propaganda to fester the site.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago

Calling masked, armed, armored thugs and terrorists with a disregard for the law a "vulnerable group" is a bit thick, isn't it?

[-] uriel238 61 points 10 months ago

The agents who implement state violence are not a group. They're agents of the state.

And now Google is directly collaborating with an oppressive autocratic regime.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Was ever any doubt who corporate America would side with?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 51 points 10 months ago

Someone recommended Kagi in another thread yesterday and that night I finally became 100% google free. Search was the last big hurdle. I was literally the biggest google fanboy. I had google home devices, google wifi, I wanted all their devices, had all their services, everything was set up and integrated. De-googling was fucking hard but I did it and I'm super proud and I've learned so much about how tech works setting up my replacement services and devices. Fuck you Google.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 48 points 10 months ago

Google says a group of masked fascists kidnapping children from their beds is a "vulnerable group".

[-] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

To be fair, they did set expectations when they got rid of the "don't be evil" moto.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 45 points 10 months ago

For the rest of my life I will never forget that Apple and Google went out of their way to defend and protect the Nazi SS of our time.

Absolutely fucking evil and unforgivable.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 44 points 10 months ago
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago

Do rich cowards that give other rich assholes fealty often do what their rulers tell them?! 1111?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 10 months ago

If you ever want to know why capitalism turns into fascism, look into how many companies willingly and knowingly did business with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.

IBM made computers to help the Holocaust, because the Nazis could pay for the service of the machines to be built.

Google is just a modern IBM.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 34 points 10 months ago

This is exactly why sideloading is very very important.

[-] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 33 points 10 months ago
[-] collar@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

Ah yes... the guys with masks, guns, the backing of the president, and virtually unlimited federal government resources are a "vulnerable group"

[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 27 points 10 months ago
[-] KelvarCherry 26 points 10 months ago

Do not let Google escape this, ever. Cancel all payments to them. YouTube Premium, YouTube subscriptions, etc.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago

So this could get much more serious if they start clamping down on the comm tools we take for granted. Between this and the incoming sideloading block - all of a sudden the most paranoid fears of Stallman's don't seem nearly as far fetched.

[-] crandlecan@mander.xyz 25 points 10 months ago

Heil Agent Orange 🍊🧡

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 24 points 10 months ago

They're totally vulnerable! Just aim for the head!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

"Why dont you stupid Americans organize or something?"

They won't let us. We're trying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Isn't ICE one of the biggest budget of the US now? How is that vulnerable?

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

~~Don’t~~ be evil.

[-] don@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 months ago

“Vulnerable” go fuck yourself with a white-hot steel dildo.

[-] gigachad@piefed.social 18 points 10 months ago

The 1 million dollar question: Would I be able to side load it with the new Google developer registration rules?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 18 points 10 months ago

Nope. Our tax dollars pay for their existence. They're not a vulnerable group, they're our employees.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Any web based alternatives? App stores aren’t needed here and it’s a lot harder to stop a website.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
1155 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

22159 readers
805 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS