89

According to documents from Microsoft's recent case against the FTC, the Xbox Series S is more popular than the Xbox Series X

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ForgetReddit@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

As someone who doesn’t own an Xbox I have no idea what the difference is and that’s a huge knock on their marketing and product teams.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

X is the flagship console, while S is the lower cost version. They’re both current gen.

[-] Jimbo@yiffit.net 13 points 1 year ago

Oh I thought the S was the refreshed last gen Xbox One?

[-] Vordus 37 points 1 year ago

No, that's the Xbox One S. This is the Xbox Series S.

[-] all-knight-party@kbin.run 56 points 1 year ago

That's hilarious. I'll never understand why they named these consoles in such a way

[-] Vordus 35 points 1 year ago

It becomes even more confusing when you think about the fact that the Xbox One is not the Xbox 1, which was just the Xbox. And that the Xbox One X, the souped up version of the Xbox One, can be abbreviated as the XBOX, which again, is not the original Xbox.

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't forget they skipped 359 console gens on their second try.

[-] w2tpmf@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

They made a full revolution, not just a slight turn.

[-] GalacticHero@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And “Revolution” was Nintendo’s codename for the Wii at the time.

[-] ForgetReddit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

These people are beyond stupid. Every single one of them needs to be fired.

[-] beefcat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They thought people would be confused by the Xbox 2 going up against the PlayStation 3 so they deliberately adotped even more confusing names.

[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Not really. If you were going to buy an xbox, you would either just buy the cheaper version, the more expensive version assuming its just better, or look up the difference.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

Ehhh consumers will figure it out

lol

[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Consumers who were already going to buy an xbox will figure it out, the rest will just buy the cheap one

[-] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

look up the difference

Sounds like too much effort

[-] 2000mph@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

It makes sense. It may suprise a lot of people on here but their biggest market is not the people who demand 4k 60FPS in all games and will riot if they don't get it. Their main market is kids playing FIFA and Minecraft and other casual gamers who just enjoy fun games at a reasonable budget. For that they really got it right with the Series S.

[-] Grangle1@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Nintendo understanding this market is a big part of how they've been outselling MS and Sony in the Wii and Switch generations despite being behind on hardware power.

[-] manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com 24 points 1 year ago

Makes sense because the Series S is dumb cheap. Only the Steam Deck can compare in terms of value

[-] tal@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago
[-] pory@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Compete in terms of value, not price. The series S gets you Xbox's current gen game library and a selection of 360 games, and if you're willing to use dev mode a powerful emulation suite. Deck gets a huge percentage of Steam's 20-year catalog as one-click installs, most other PC games that don't use anticheat as slightly more involved installs, every PC game if you want to install windows, and also a powerful emulation suite. Plus it's a dockable handheld instead of something that needs a monitor and controller.

The series S has better media apps and can be woken up from the couch, though.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

the steam deck is also just a regular ol' PC so you can use it for non-gaming stuff like making a lil' drawing on the go, or plug in some peripherals and just.. use it like an honestly pretty okay performance desktop.

[-] Phanatik@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I would argue that the Steam Deck's emulation capabilities surpass the Xbox. It might not play the latest games at amazing quality and performance, but it covers a wide breadth of games, far wider than what Xbox supports.

[-] Vordus 5 points 1 year ago

Depends on whether you're willing to spend $20 to turn your Series S into a devkit, at which point the S can be an utter beast for emulation.

[-] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Alternatively 2$ if your region is set to Turkey.

[-] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I mean, for a long time the Series S was all I saw in stores.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The “S” had a good two years lead in availability, so anyone who needed to replace their console got that. Anyone impatient got that.

Personally I gave up after two years not being able to get my kids X’s, and instead built gaming computers with them. No more xboxes

[-] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've been waiting for a game that will be worth it, that I can only play on a new console, and so far I haven't seen one. I'm closer to upgrading my graphics card than getting a new console at this point.

[-] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

i meanNnNnNnNnNnNn

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Neither is very popular..lol

I know of 3 people in my life that have owned or do own an xbox.but almost everyonw i know own or have owned a playstation

Generally theyre not super popular outside of the US.

[-] learningduck@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Especially in Asia, which is a shame. My country doesn't has a game pass and no official store. At least now we have a GP on PC, but not on the console yet

[-] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Xbox sales in the UK has a similarish rate as the PS5 does.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

nah, this was true during launch when both were constantly sold out, but now that availability has grown this has not stayed linear. the PS5 currently makes up around half of all consoles sold in the UK, followed by switch and eventually xbox. xbox sales are actually down 20% or so year-to-date.

[-] analisys@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I have both X and S and love the S. It's almost portable, small, slick and gives enough power to enjoy games when I'm not in front of huge tv.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The X is trying to compete in a premium space, long with the PS5. The X falls short of the PS5 in almost every category that a premium consumer cares about, and I don't think premium consumers are interested in value-oriented subscriptions like GamePass.

The S is competing with.... Well definitely not the Switch. I wouldn't say the Steam Deck either. It was competing to an extent with the PS4 and Xbox One, but not anymore. The S has kind of been left in its own market, so this news makes sense.

Maybe the Switch 2 will have some overlap in that market, but assuming it's a hybrid handheld it might still be differentiated enough to leave the S on it's own. Sony has been working on lowering the cost of the PS5 but I can't see that getting anywhere near S territory. So unless something else drops I don't see the S having competition any time soon.

[-] Goronmon@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

The X falls short of the PS5 in almost every category that a premium consumer cares about...

What are the other categories aside from exclusives?

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Controller features, VR, non-proprietsry storage.

When you're talking about a premium market in particular, I think most high-end consumers who care about the aesthetics of their living room would prefer the official, matching Dualsense charger/stand over Microsoft's charging kit.

The exclusives are huge, especially factoring in backwards-compatibility. Xbox is undoubtedly a better value if you already have a library of older Xbox games or you are shopping used. But if you divide consumers up into Budget, Value, and Premium tiers, I don't think the Premium tier consumers care about playing games that old. The PS4 had way more big-budget AAA exclusives than the Xbox One did, so I think PlayStation has the advantage there.

Weirdly, I think there's some dissonance with this around disc drives. I would think premium consumers would care less about physical media: they aren't buying used games and probably have concerns for the aesthetic of storing physical media. I personally prefer physical media, but I consider myself a value consumer who has no qualms buying used and can handle a little bit of clutter. So I think disc drive versions are valued less by the premium segment, but costs more to manufacture. So I think that boosts the sales of the diaclsss PS5. Premium consumers aren't interested in the Series S at all though, so if they do go Xbox they just get the X and don't use the drive. I kind of wonder how the market will react if the rumors of Sony selling an external drive end up true.

[-] Goronmon@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm unsure of these "premium" consumers caring about proprietary vs non-proprietary storage. Or caring about VR in the context of consoles instead of PCs. Or that the charger stand being a concern when the PS5 looks like it does.

[-] pory@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The S is a stellar emulation box that doesn't need to be jailbroken. It's a hell of a lot easier to configure than a custom Linux distro like RetroPie and the hardware packs a punch. I don't own one, but I'd be more likely to buy a series S than a PS5 or series X.

[-] brawleryukon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] pory@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's about using emulators in retail mode which nobody with half a brain thought was gonna stick around. You pay $20 to unlock developer mode and do all your emulation stuff in there. Retail is for playing actual xbox games.

[-] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] CarlsIII@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

May Wario fart in your mouth

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I own a Series X, but I also own a 4k TV. So, for me, it made sense to spend the extra $$$ and get a console that could truly utilize my TV's capabilities. If I had a 1080p TV, I probably would have gone with the Series S.

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I always figured that was exactly why they had both consoles.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I own a Series X and a 4k TV but I actually use it to game on my older 1080p TV.

I bought the Series X for the disc drive & larger internal storage primarily with the better overall specs and performance just being a bonus.

[-] doctorzeromd@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I feel like that's like saying the MacBook air is more popular than the MacBook pro...

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

Games

32634 readers
371 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS