328
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by baxster@sopuli.xyz to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

The EU Commission is lying open on social media about chat control. Tomorrow EU governments debate about Chat control 2.0 Use the fightchatcontrol.eu email tool to make yourself heard

EUCommission Mastodon post

‘Danger to Democracy’ patrick-breyer

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] onlooker@lemmy.ml 138 points 3 weeks ago

Only material that is clearly child sexual abuse will be searched for and can be detected.

Uh-huh. And how do you search for something specific without decrypting everything first? This is fucking embarrassing.

[-] Scavenger8294@feddit.org 13 points 3 weeks ago

Wasn’t the plan for the messenger to scan for explicit material before the messages were sent (and encrypted)?

[-] onlooker@lemmy.ml 37 points 3 weeks ago

I'm going off of a article by TechRadar, but essentially: yes. This isn't about breaking encryption as I initially thought, though that seems to have been the goal when the same law was proposed (and rightfully rejected) in 2022. Rather, the new revision is about making encryption utterly pointless through the virtue of scanning all messages on your device, as you suggested. At least that's my read on the situation.

[-] funkycarrot@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yup, that's it.

[-] Eirikr70@jlai.lu 2 points 3 weeks ago

And so, where is the problem?... Your message is scanned. If it is illegitimate you can't send it. What is the problem?

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 weeks ago

How will that initial scan take place? On your device, or sent to a server? Once you give the authorities that ability, will they stop at CSAM, or will they flag anti-israel content as well?

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago

The government doesnt get to read every message I send and see if they deem it sendable or not. Thats the problem

If you think this would stop at CSAM then you're naive.

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago

What if they decide tomorrow that critisising the government is unlawful? That you get arrested for being LGBTQ? Send "Free Palestine" at your friends and have cops at your door?

If they allow this scanning, they just need to edit a text file to immediately flag thousands for having certain beliefs.

Besides, the real criminals will just move encryption to a different level or find different ways to bypass this.

Ultimately, there's only one solution for governments. That is to ban all encryption. And hopefully that's something we never see happening.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

These same people are at the same time taking away freedom of speech to support a genocide. How do I know they won't scan for pro Palestine content?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

They scanned your message and found you were critical of Israel, a team has been sent to your location to resolve the issue.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's a fair clarification but hardly meaningful, and arguably much worse.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"Only the thing we are searching for will be searched for"

How do you know if a message has that content without scanning all messages to begin with?

The fuck? Do they think we are stupid?

[-] tiwdll@lemmy.ml 54 points 3 weeks ago

Do they think we are stupid?

They definitely do. And they are partly right, for the average person this is enough to stop worrying

[-] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 weeks ago

The average person wasn't even worried or indeed aware of this to begin with

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

They do the Kremlin defence, just shit out words without meaning, wrong meaning, correct meaning, more words, and everyone can find their "right" answer.

Here the gullible/tech illiterate can get their "right" answer.

[-] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 57 points 3 weeks ago

They should just mandate that the child pornographers set the evil bit. It would save the EU leaders the trouble of learning how cryptography works.

[-] bier@feddit.nl 47 points 3 weeks ago

EU: We are not going to read your chats or look at your photos, we just stop the CP.

People: so how will you know what chats and photos contain CP?

EU: Just trust me bro...

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 47 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah we all know that's BS. "Child porn only" will become "anything illegal" which will become "whatever we want" and SL"with a warrant" will become "all the time"

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

DNA testing started out that way, and went exactly as predicted.

[-] m33@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

The only way it will go indeed

[-] krunklom@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 weeks ago

I'm actually starting to think 25/7 monitoring of all digital communications is actually a good idea.

For politicians.

It's the only way to sure they're accountable to the public. This should be the trade off. You enter into politics and literally the only privacy you ever have is when you're in the bathroom.

Every fart, sneeze, cough, every email you send, every text you send on a phone, website you visit, is public record.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago

there will always be burner phones

[-] krunklom@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

Good luck getting one under 24/7 surveillance.

[-] cheloxin@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Prisons are full of contraband. I imagine it's just that much easier on the outside.

[-] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 weeks ago

They always use sex crimes and "the worst of the worst" as an excuse. Always. Then they come after political dissidents and the vulnerable.

[-] klay1@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The wording of that message wiggles around a lot. When you read it again, you realize there can be:

  • almost every monitoring of online communications (just not 'general')
  • all chat scanning (just no chat 'control')
  • everything can be detected (just child abuse will be searched for AND detected)
  • sneak peaking at everybody's chats is ok. (But 'detection orders' need a thorough process)

This is the language of some one who knows is guilty

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 3 weeks ago

"do not read this comment"

The only way to know not to read it is to read it

[-] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 weeks ago

Why doesn't any group of people get that it's OUR devices abd not THEIRS.

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

Ok listen some of you will have to become politicians & get them life-imprisonment sentences

[-] sdiown@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It will just start with those, then slowly increase their right

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

This is absolutely a bad idea that shouldn't be implemented. However, everyone who is continuing to push fo the digital spying with the rhetoric like that needs to be checked thoroughly. Statistically, I can almost guarantee that their hard drives is full of child porn and their basements are full of skeletons.

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

If this were just hash checks running on the local device before it's encrypted and sent I could accept it. Using AI is a step too far.

[-] anon5621@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No, even this should not be applied or sent anywhere. It's my phone I decide what it does, no one else. I paid for it with my money

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think refusing to send anything that's on the hash list wouldn't be far enough for the EU.

[-] Hatman@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Can we assassinate these fucks next please?

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
328 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

42334 readers
579 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS