725
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 hours ago

Did anyone actually watch the clip? Am I going crazy? It's like 20% boos and 80% applause. Very misleading title IMO.

[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 44 points 15 hours ago

Those responsible for the booing will be found and deported to El Salvador.

Thank you for your attention to this matter!

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago

Smithers...have the Rolling Stones killed.

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 42 points 19 hours ago
[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 167 points 23 hours ago

That came after the United States Tennis Association sent a memo to media partners requesting that they censor “disruptions or reactions” in response to Trump. “We ask all broadcasters to refrain from showcasing any disruptions or reactions in response to the President’s attendance in any capacity,” the USTA said in the memo.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 115 points 23 hours ago

It's funny to read yesterday's headline, aka this quote, and then read today's headline. Everyone is going to boo him tomorrow, please don't talk about it. He was in fact boo'ed, let's talk about it.

I guess funny is the wrong word. Insanity?

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago

This is what happens when you involve yourself in someone's war against reality and rational thinking

[-] trager_bombs@lemmy.world 62 points 20 hours ago

Hope they boo louder next time.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago

Hope the next guy doesn't miss. Boos don't accomplish shit.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 22 points 20 hours ago
[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

Vote with whichever of the three boxes is appropriate

[-] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

s/vote/aim better/

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Still waiting to find out that the first incident was a setup. Wouldn't be surprised to learn they found an individual desiring suicide by cop to do it and sacrificed a random magat for the cause.

That is, if it's ever actually investigated.

[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Funny how they don't talk about it anymore eh?

I'm thinking blatant setup

[-] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Ohhh Jack Black is going to cancel your tour

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 10 points 20 hours ago

Every act of resistance, no matter how small, advances our cause and diminishes their control.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

carry sand in your pockets

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Hello Donald, you got sum purty lips.

[-] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 86 points 1 day ago

Booing is pretty tame and lame, honestly.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It’s tame but not lame. Every little bit helps. If it bruised his ego even a little bit, it’s a win.

[-] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 112 points 23 hours ago

Tame but effective, imagine if everywhere you went and everything you did there was a crowd booing you.

[-] Lawelen@fedia.io 3 points 13 hours ago

That's why puttin sits in bunker most of the time.

[-] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 23 hours ago

I'd much rather it be a giant crowding shouting "child rapist" while throwing anything they could get their hands on at him.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 35 points 23 hours ago

while more impactful, that takes more prep time and work. there is a magic to booing. it is uncontrollable, unstoppable, and requires no thought. it gives everyone a free space in which to enter into a grand vocalization of "we stand for what you do not." there is no real way to boo performatively. there is too little room for interpretation within the reverberations of the crowd.

if you do not like booing the 47th president of the united states, i recommend digging into what the problem with the act is, and consider that there's many routes to resistance. for me, i don't like booing the president because the president is meant to be a spectacle. it doesn't matter if you love or hate him. it matters that you feel strongly. the argument i can hear is that you want to increase another kind of spectacle to give the people something to engage in. me, i want to remove him from all spectacle he engages in from my life and focus on community engagement. there is likely valor to both.

but please. consider that better than throwing things at him, giving him the spectacle he thrives in, might be when he appears at an event you are at, that means you don't care about the org that let him in in the first place anymore. get up out of your seat, and make your way to the exit, never to return again.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

That's a good post, but it's wasted here. On Lemmy, any actual action is always disparaged. The only acceptable response to fascism is to sit home furiously wanking about what you'd totally do if only you had an army of meat shields to protect you from the consequences.

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 6 points 20 hours ago

I mean, I personally wouldn't ask people to throw guns at him.

What's in the gun, however...

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Can't be as bad as MAGA actively destroying everything I've ever held dear about this country

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 13 points 23 hours ago

And now imagine you have narcissistic personality disorder and it hits so much harder

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Imagine if you're the dictator of the wealthiest and most powerful nation in human history.

A few boos from folks in the cheap seats seems like a small price to pay when you can feast on the townsfolk every night with abandon.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

but effective

Which of Trump's attacks on the US have been effectively mitigated or prevented by booing? Best I can tell, he doesn't give a single flying fuck about it.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 9 points 20 hours ago

Partly its about reminding his supporters and the neutrals that the people who actively dislike him really do exist. One of their talking points around election fraud/denialism is the idea that there just aren't enough voters against Trump to justify the votes, because that's what they're told.

Granted, they're also told that people like these booers are all paid actors. Paid by whom, and how do they keep anyone from blabbing about these arrangements?

Anyway, every person who gets splintered off from the Trump Train is a win, so push every way you can.

[-] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 5 points 23 hours ago

I don’t hear many boos. Just a crowd.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago

I'd deport them.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 1 points 22 hours ago

The problem with it is the fact he reacts like all bullies do: he'll have a temper-tantrum and do more despicable things even harder than before as an analog to stomping his feet in anger.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 11 points 17 hours ago

You have heard that Donnie has the most fragile ego possible, right? Mass dissent he can directly witness is far more effective than you think.

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

What else are you gonna do at a tennis match?

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Aim a ball machine at his inflamed cankles

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago

I don't think anyone is arguing that this is changing anything. Just that it's funny.

[-] CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago

It IS funny for sure. And to a massive narcissist it probably stings. And hopefully pulls them out of whatever reality bubble they normally reside in. They need to be reminded that they do not have public support at every opportunity.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 27 points 20 hours ago

The Sinner-Alcaraz match

OH COME ON. YOU CAN NOT MAKE THIS SHIT UP.

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 21 points 23 hours ago
[-] gribzy_uk@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago

I was saying boo-urns.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Whatever happened to the free speech maximalists?

[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago

As an apt gesture of appreciation, I'm writing a stern letter to my HOA rep.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
725 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25544 readers
2020 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS