581
Hanlon's Razor (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/tumblr@lemmy.world
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 87 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Also, Hanlon's Razor applies to individuals.

A small child dropping a glass? An adult causing an accident? Sure, that's incompetence.

A company shipping a bad product that kills people? Malice, and Greed. They could afford someone to check that people don't get hurt, they profit from the misery.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago

If your ignorance causes harm you get at most one strike

If you continue to choose harmful ignorance in the face of truth, you are simply malicious

[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Willful ignorance... IS negligence

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

While I agree, and I believe negligence is bad, it is not malice. Malice can include negligence with intent to remain negligent. But also negligence can come from not knowing better which is not itself malicious.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm not saying ignorant people are malicious; just that malicious people tend to be ignorant.

[-] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 5 points 6 days ago

I think ignorance of things like the value of life or the individuality of others excuses them from the empathy we have for the stupid

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 days ago

That can be corrected though, it's willful ignorance should not be tolerated.

[-] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 5 points 6 days ago

can it? I've never been able to convince someone that other people exist and have value. it seems like people who grow up without that tend to stay that way. how do you correct that?

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 days ago

The person has to want to be better. Not everyone does. Especially when their faults form part of their identity.

[-] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 2 points 6 days ago

I guess when I meet adults like that this is usually the case

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 days ago

It seems to be, increasingly, the case in my experience too.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 6 days ago

When you look at figures like Trump or Boslonaro and their respective cronies, intentional malice is the only explanation

[-] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago

Hanlon's razor doesn't apply to politicians or the rich

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

hanlon's razor doesn't apply to politicians because they are paid to know the stuff they're talking about.

hanlon's razor doesn't apply to the rich because their common narrative is that they deserve that position of wealth and power because they're so intelligent and reasonable and such. so they better know their stuff.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

Malice and ignorance often go hand in hand.

[-] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 7 points 6 days ago

Need to distinguish between the powerful and the powerless.

Because the powerful often have the knowledge and then use it to gain power, malice.

While the powerless often are just misled and victims of the powerful.

[-] CraigimusPR1M3@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

I reference Hanlon's Razor commonly, never can remember the name though. I like the addition of the second part too though. There certainly comes a point where it can only be willful ignorance and we dont support that

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 8 points 6 days ago

Your weekly reminder that Marie-Antoinette didn't have much to do with the famine in France and that "let them eat cake" is ahistorical.

[-] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

My only issue with Hanlon is that many bots are out there and ones that have bad intent. IRL I think it applies, but various populated online spaces I feel differently about.

oooooooh no, there's plenty of people who really are just that dumb. my mother for example. you can explain the same thing to her a thousand times and she will still not get the even most basic stuff, as long as she just doesn't want to understand them, for whatever reason. don't assume malice, assume a missing brain or sth

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

"Indistinguishable from malice" doesn't mean they're malicious. It means their ignorance is causing harm as if they were malicious.

Like say if someone didn't understand vaccines to such an extent that they voted to remove them. Causing harm.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
581 points (100.0% liked)

tumblr

5113 readers
365 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS