196
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Okay, I'm not doing purity politics, he can change his was and I can forgive him. There's still some years left.

[-] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 2 points 1 hour ago

The "vote blue no matter who" mantra is how we ended up with Killary and Kamalama-ding-dong in the fucking first place. How'd that work out?

[-] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I refuse to vote for him after he appeared on Charlie Kirk's podcast, said he completely aligns with him on trans issues, in particular banning HRT for minors and putting trans women in men's prisons.

Source

At the close of the podcast, Charlie Kirk shifted the discussion to transgender healthcare, stating, "I encourage you to learn about the butchery that is happening under chemical castration in this state. The American people are overwhelmingly against it." Newsom responded, "Yeah. I think we have to be more sensitized to that."

Kirk continued, "Youth should be off limits, you might be right on deportations, I know I’m right on this," to which Newsom simply acknowledged, "Yeah." Kirk then cited the Cass Report—a widely criticized and legally discredited review used to justify bans on transgender healthcare in the UK—as evidence that gender-affirming care for youth should be prohibited. Newsom offered no pushback, replying, "I’m not an expert on this, but I appreciate your broader [point]."

I honestly thought he was looking to run as a Republican in 2028. Fuck him. I'm done. I held my nose and voted for Clinton, Biden, and Harris, but this is my breaking point. I've had it.

[-] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

BUT HIS INTERNS WROTE IN ALL CAPS. HE’S A GENIUS, SOME SAY NO ONE HAS NEVER DONE THAT BEFORE. EPIC. THANK FOR YOUR ATTESTATION OF THIS MASSAGE.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

seems like they are pushing him pretty hard, the DNC that is, seeing as how they freaked out over THE MINNESOTA mayor and zohran in nyc. having him doing some performative parlor tricks for the media.

[-] hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 hours ago

A democrat who does awful things and "aspire[s] to be Ronald Reagan". That's not a democratic or liberal candidate. It's a conservative take-over of the democratic party.

[-] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 17 points 11 hours ago

There are many better options than Newsom, and if the dem party can't find true representatives, the party needs to be reborn.

[-] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 58 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I will never forget that Gavin Newsom vetoed ranked choice voting in CA. He's already demonstrated that he is anti-democratic. I would vote against Trump every time no matter who the DNC put up, including Newsom, but I would be holding my nose yet again to vote for the less shitty of two shitty choices. The DNC can't keep running on "we're not Trump." They needed to give us a candidate we actually wanted.

[-] TherapyGary 18 points 12 hours ago

I would vote against Trump every time no matter who the DNC put up

They needed to give us a candidate we actually wanted.

Apparently they don't

[-] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 22 points 12 hours ago

Astute viewers at home may have noticed that the Democrats just lost the last election with that strategy. Just because I'll hold my nose and do the necessary thing doesn't mean everyone else will. In fact, they didn't.

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Just because I'll hold my nose and do the necessary thing doesn't mean everyone else will.

The 'necessary thing' is voting for a fascist multi millionaire? He may be slightly better than the current guy, since the bar to pass is so low, but he's very far from an actually valid candidate.

I understand different people have different situations in which the 'necessary thing' may vary. However, he'll only solve a handful of current issues plaguing the USA, if even that. From whefe I'm standing (which arguably is quite far away as I'm a European) you'd achieve much more by protesting. Especially given that there may not be another election in your country. Though I'm also aware protests in the USA may come with serious risk of injury or loss of life.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 38 points 14 hours ago

The really weird thing I've noticed lately is just how vocal the "this isn't the time to divide the left" crowd are, when the elections are so far off. This is exactly the right time to be having a serious reckoning on what the Democratic Party should be, and that isn't going to happen unless there is a credible threat of losing left-wing voters.

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 hours ago

These are the same type of people who actively support neoliberalism and want to sabatoge the left. Ask them if they support Zohran Mamdani.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 6 hours ago

or that minnesota? mayor they threw in teh bus, and david hoggs they also did too.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago

If we’re not allowed to criticize candidates in the general then I’m gonna criticize them extra hard in the primaries.

I’m gonna have to vote for whoever everyone else picks anyway because my choice has literally never won.

[-] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 5 points 3 hours ago

What primary? I believe the little switcheroo they pulled to try and shove Kamalama-ding-dong down democrats throats, was on purpose. That makes 3 primaries in a row that the DNC fucked over democrats, which is why I registered Independent the last time I got a new license.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 9 points 13 hours ago

Well yeah? You didn’t think they were being earnest, the point has always been to get you to shut up and simply vote for whoever they want you too.

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 hours ago

Bingo. The rhetoric exists specifically to deter any consideration about defecting from the party line because they aren't actually of the left, they are the right wing defense of the capitalist status quo; the same capitalist status quo that is currently devolving into fascism in its late stages.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago

"I can prove with statistics that you're a Nazi enabler (just as long as you don't look at the statistics, and also you make all the same assumptions as me about how other people would have voted in my hypothetical scenario)"

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Instead of trying to tear down the other Dems, why aren't you trying to build up your candidates?

Bernie is better about this than you are. Follow his lead.

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

So terrible to “tear down” (criticize) a politician siding with the far right on trans people. His feelings are much more important than trans kids being safe and healthy, obviously.

If Bernie has told anyone to shut up about Newsom’s transphobia he can also fuck off.

By the way, all this “tearing down” has a super easy fix. All he has to do is stop being a fucking transphobe. If it’s so important that everyone supports him, you should call his office and tell him to walk that shit back. Because it’s going to lose him voters if he tries a presidential run.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Legislation signed by Newsom:

2024 Ban on Parental Notification:

Newsom signed a bill prohibiting school districts from notifying parents if their child changes their gender identity, protecting students from forced outings and creating a safe space for gender exploration. 

California Sanctuary State Law:

In 2022, Newsom signed a law making California a refuge for transgender youth and families from other states with discriminatory laws, ensuring access to gender-affirming care. 

Inclusion in Death Tracking:

Newsom signed a bill into law that explicitly included sexual orientation and gender identity in the tracking data for violent deaths of LGBTQ individuals. 

Areas of conflict and criticism:

Veto of Custody Bill:

In 2023, Newsom vetoed a bill that would have required judges to consider a parent's affirmation of their child's gender identity in custody disputes. 

Concerns about Trans Athletes:

Newsom has voiced opposition to transgender athletes competing in women's sports, a stance that has drawn criticism from the LGBTQ+ community for aligning with conservative viewpoints on the issue. 

Public Resistance to School Notification:

Newsom's initial resistance to the ban on parental notification, even as he signed other bills expanding rights, caused tension within the LGBTQ+ community. 

Recent shifts in Newsom's position:

Podcast with Charlie Kirk:

In March 2025, Newsom appeared on a podcast with right-wing provocateur Charlie Kirk, where he agreed with Kirk's views on the "unfair advantage" of trans athletes in sports, causing shock and condemnation from allies and sparking debate about his commitment to trans rights. 

Internal Democratic Feud:

His stance on trans issues, including athletes, is reportedly causing tension within the Democratic Party and has been seen by some as a strategic move to avoid being associated with the party's support for trans rights, especially after recent election losses. 

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Why are you explaining this to me like I’m not a trans person who has lived in California over a decade?

California LGBTQ leaders and organizations with decades of experience in advocating for LGBTQ people immediately condemned his statements. It doesn’t matter what legislation he’s signed in the past, throw the trans community under the bus and that goes out the window.

If any criticism of him is bad, the only way to make it stop is to get him to stop being a transphobe for political gain. Period. If everyone has shut up about it then it’s because I’m dead.

Also, don’t you think it’s a little rude to respond to a comment with a ChatGPT infodump without even disclosing it?

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago

because they would lose thier tax cuts benefits from the gop, which they almost never reverse, and money and power that comes with being part of the inner circle of the DNC, which is basically gop lite.

[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

I feel like there are way more comments about how you can't make me support Newsom but people that actually… say you have to support Newsome. Like do they even really exist here?

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

I'm already getting so many fundraising emails from Colin Alred's campaign in Texas

[-] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

We need to rember the recall election agianst him was pushed by republicans but wasn't baseless...the question wasn't was did he do it, it was who could replace him that isnt worse, when we saw mr drag a bear and generic white democrats, gavin won not on merit, but by default. By no means is a good candidate but he gives the people a good liberal bribe.

We cannont let a right wing governor take the reigns, and we dont want to lose what gavin has given us, thats where we stand.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
196 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9293 readers
1516 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS