oh man. so thankful. just biting my nails about the cracker barrel logo.
I am so confused as to why anyone gives a fucking shit about this.
People are bored because their lives are easy. That will change soon.
same thing happened with the sydney sweeney ad. all i care about is them titties
Wait a minute. The logo is literally a cracker and a barrel 🤣. I'm surprised conservatives are ok being made fun of.
The backlash from the racist bigots you mean. Where else are they going to go after church to be mean to the wait staff
The title already says Conservative though.
Yeah. But fuck em. Call em what they are.
Lol.
Boomer oriented company chooses to stay in business for a few more years until boomers are all gone.
I went into a Cracker Barrel once. 90% elderly.
No bigger snowflake than a MAGAt.
Who gives a shit about a logo??? Companies can do whatever the hell they want with their logos so shut up about it and start asking: WHERE'S THE EPSTEIN FILES???
Probably not at Cracker Barrel, but I suppose anything's possible.
Trump stored those stolen documents he was selling to the Saudis in a bathroom. You never know where he hides documents he absolutely has.
The reaction has been absurd, but their new logo was definitely awful.
I don't think that the old logo is great either, and the update did improve on technical aspects. You don't want to have all that small text, for example. And generally, simpler logos are preferable.
But...their shtick is a rustic feel. Whatever you can say about the original logo, it did evoke that. I have a hard time seeing the new one doing that.
EDIT: I also think that this compares favorably to another controversial recent rebrand: Musk rebranding Twitter, which was generally seen as not a good idea; Twitter already had a strong brand identity. People weren't happy and Musk went right ahead with it regardless. At Cracker Barrel, the initial response was "calm down, it'll be okay", but they were willing to second-guess themselves, even though I expect that there were people there who were invested in the rebrand.
EDIT2: They'd also done smaller, more incremental changes to the logo in the past, because the "Old Country Store" text had had its typeface changed at some point in the past.
EDIT3: Here's a more-comprehensive history:
https://dwglogo.com/cracker-barrel-logo/
If they'd just textured the background shape to actually look like a barrel it would be pretty good actually.
I do find it amusing that the “classic” logo everyone is pining for is from the “ancient” year of 1997…
Tbf as weird as it sounds, ‘97 is vintage now
According to another site, the logo was 1977, not 1997. Which tracks with another article mentioning a marketing person coming up with the design in the 70s
How was it awful?
Could you tell me what the heck this yellow blob shape is supposed to be?
From a purely graphic design perspective, the classic logo is too busy and doesn't scale well. The only thing it has going for it is the weirdness of the shape and the distinct color combination. It's technically a really bad logo. You may not prefer the new logo but, technically, it's a whole lot better. It's far more adaptable to newer platforms while stilling being recognizable. Now, as far as being an effective representation of the brand and if that's a corporate concern, I don't know that I can comment on that.
In another post about this, someone posted a bunch of other fast food logos, and they all looked very much the same, especially in silhouette. They're all just a same-y blend of mediocrity, whereas the existing logo was at least unique.
McDonald's probably has the best and most distinctive logo out of anyone.
I will continue to not care at all about it. Release the Epstein files.
I'm not conservative in the slightest and I thought the redesign was completely ass.
Yes, but did you go unhinged calling it "woke"? The logo was a poor fit and I could get behind it, but so many MAGAs losing it over calling a lame logo "woke"....
The whole restaurant is complete ass.
Thank god! Now can we get back to the important issues? How's that WAR ON CHRISTMAS going?
The war on Christmas CANNOT END until Christmas ceases its illegal occupation of November.
We are once again calling on the Claus regime to return to their side of the borders outlined in the Black Friday agreement.
There are xmas decorations in stores right now. And it was very funny to hear the Halloween decorations making spooky noises at them. I hate this badly written episode of Star Trek!
November? I think you forgot to include September and October.
I've never seen people freak out so hard over a LOGO change. Jesus, it's not like they changed the typeface to Comic Sans or Papyrus or some shit!
Because everything in the United States has been turned into "us vs them" crap.
Were it not for the whiny fucking losers and their incessant bitching and moaning over everything, I wouldn't have know nor cared.
I still don't care.
Was it really conservative backlash? I don't think anyone liked it, lol.
Non-conservatives give a shit about cracker barrel?
nope, because its not near where we live. Only cons ever cared about this.
I gotta meet up with the old people in my family somewhere. I'm not having them in my house are you crazy
Just what we needed. Conservatives feeling even more empowered. Goddamnit.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
