This isn't about making it harder to access your rights. It's signalling what rights you've lost. Who can advocate for your freedoms when the highest courts follow this new doctrine?
People are being rounded up and sent to concentration camps. It's real easy to play armchair game theorist here, but in order to properly fight back people need safe places to retreat to who will defend you from being kidnapped or outright executed.
There's plenty of people rebelling btw.
I've been port forwarding for decades at this point. I just recently found out about tunneling your traffic through relays like that. Pretty neat stuff. Glad I can finally ditch my isp and switch to another without worrying about their port forwarding policies
Standing up and eating better would also work I assume
I would sooner ride a camel through the eye of a needle than go to heaven
I never really liked Google, but their whole thing was supposed to be that you never needed to worry about backups.
But as Google so often does, they've decided to screw people over who relied on their drive and office suite.
No, this was a data leak. The word "hack" has legal implications and shifts the blame away from the company and onto the individual who discovered the leak.
This just confirms Twitter is a 1M line BASIC program.
Thanks Yoda
Don't tell me how to live 🦅🇺🇸
Be gone AI SLOP
What the hell is a "data issue"