637
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] artyom@piefed.social 206 points 1 month ago

I love that he responded to their takedown request by releasing an entire video about Bloomberg and their shitfuckery.

[-] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 107 points 1 month ago

I would like to see more content relating to the last interview in the video with Mr. Pigeon. Truly think he has great arguments that need further airtime

[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago

So controversial, yet so brave

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sickday@kbin.earth 88 points 1 month ago

Time to move to nebula? :)

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 87 points 1 month ago
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago

Every substantial youtube channel should be hosting and backing up to a self-hosted, owned, peertube.

[-] Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 month ago

Issue is such channels need giant amounts of storage for this.

Linus tech Tips showed his multiple upgrades over the years it's quite crazy what they need on storage space.

[-] Auth@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago

LTT storage is excessive. He stores all his footage in full quality instead of just storing his final edited videos in a compressed format. Plus if you're a youtuber with millions of subscribers you can afford to pay for a few TB of storage to hold and serve your videos. Its not that expensive.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 month ago

Not after you lose your channel and all your income. PeerTube doesn't appeal to people who make a living at this because there's no revenue stream.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 24 points 1 month ago

He stores all his footage in full quality instead of just storing his final edited videos in a compressed format.

That's the right way to do it, you want to avoid generation loss as much as possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not just storage, but bandwidth. Streaming one video to potentially thousands of people at once can get very expensive.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] artyom@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago

Nebula is a shithole, just have a glance at their privacy policy.

Floatplane would be ideal but I think he burned that bridge.

PeerTube is probably his best bet.

I don't want to see his channel deleted but I'm also VERY interested in what would take place in the aftermath...

[-] MHLoppy@fedia.io 53 points 1 month ago

Nebula is a shithole, just have a glance at their privacy policy.

https://nebula.tv/privacy

It looks pretty run of the mill to me?

Because youtube was so much better in that regard?

Might sell your data in the future is a hell of a lot better than currently selling the shit out of your data. Nebula is a side grade in terms of privacy, but an upgrade in terms of creators not getting their shit deleted for no good reason.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago

I'm so fucking sick and tired of everyone saying "WELL EVERYONE ELSE IS DOING IT TOO!" as if that's any sort of defense. The world is fucked. You do you but I'm gonna do whatever I can not to contribute to it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

How is his channel going to be deleted? They appealed the take down and YouTube will reinstate the video in a matter of 10 days if Bloomberg failed to produce proof that he used their copy right shit. I'm actually genuinely asking because I watched the whole video and Steve didn't say anything about their channel being deleted.

[-] maaneeack@lemmy.world 131 points 1 month ago

3 dmca/copyright strikes on a channel and yt deletes you. It was mentioned near the beginning of the video.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago

I would assume its in reference to the section of the video quoting YouTube's policies that channels can be removed after 3 copyright strikes. Bloomberg has 10 days to appeal to YouTube and keep the strike active

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

I sympathize with Steve and how he is, and how he goes about explaining things. And the style of making sharp points.

But he’s also flawed, and knows how to play the content game. This is nearly just clickbait. And they flew across the country in service of his style of rhetoric.

I honestly wish more people with audiences were just as pedantic and critical as he is. But he also has his own set of biases in the computer landscape. He is still a Gamer after all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bloomberg has 10 days to file for lawsuit against Gamers Nexus. If they do, the take down stands, and it's a strike until Gamers Nexus may win the case. Which will be expensive. 3 strikes and YouTube closes the channel with near zero option for appeal.

Gamers Nexus cannot manage if a big company like Bloomberg goes all in. They can easily bankrupt a small channel like Gamers Nexus with frivolous lawsuits. And if you are bankrupt, you can't defend yourself.

The US judicial system is heavily tilted towards those that have more money.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 65 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Time for them to at minimum mirror their channel to Odysee and/or PeerTube so that they'll still have a platform just in case their channel gets nuked.

Even if you don't plan on ditching YT outright, it's still a good idea to mirror to Odysee, PeerTube, or both, as a backup because of shit like this.

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 64 points 1 month ago

All YouTube will be is just AI “creator” slop soon. People should be ditching that shit post-haste.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 26 points 1 month ago

Aw, don't you love searching for an update on something just for the algorithm to show you a low view count video that's a mediocre computer voice talking over a barely related slideshow?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

Before Google came along, most search engines were manually curated. I'm disappointed that nobody's had any success bringing that concept back. They always cave in and take the cheap route by trying to make the general public & algorithms rate things, which of course instantly gets gamed to uselessness.

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The pagerank algorithm worked fine for many years in the 2000-2010s before google transitioned into a full time advertising company

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@lemmy.zip 54 points 1 month ago

Bloomberg’s lawyer to Steve: how DARE you contact us without going through another lawyer

[-] toad31@lemmy.cif.su 40 points 1 month ago

He should be on PeerTube, anyways.

[-] OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network 45 points 1 month ago

Waaaay less money to be made there. Not saying he's exclusively doing this for the money like the other reply, but we're not talking about some solo guy making videos in his free time for fun. The man is running a business, needs money to make this videos happen, and to my knowledge this is his job.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

I do not understand why creators feel the need to be exclusively on one platform. Simply crosspost the videos.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 19 points 1 month ago

$$$ that's why. YouTube gives the greatest return. If they post to multiple platforms, not only is it more work, but they then also subtract from the number of views they get on YouTube. It's all about the $$$.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 26 points 1 month ago

Stop building houses on the king's land.

[-] notarobot@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 month ago

I don't watch his channel, but from here it seems like he is in a "rage" spiral. Like being a bit unpleasant and when people respond to that he doubles down going fro just a bit to kind of an ass

[-] Technologist@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

Yeah it's strange why more people don't just give into corporate greed and losing ownership of their channels when they discuss potential (obvious) corruption.

Upsetting that they would react in a negative way!

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago

Ive also only seen a few videos of his over the last few years but it seems like he's recently had some wildly successful videos based off exposing corruption in the PC/tech industry and has morphed his channel from tech reviews to some sort of investigative journalism chasing that high he got from said viral videos.

[-] 123@programming.dev 29 points 1 month ago

He goes into detail on some of the videos, but to summarize the "controversial" videos due less well when it comes to recouping the money it takes to film them (if at all). They (often):

  • have to account for more travel expenses to interview people
  • can't be sponsored since no one wants to sign up for those kinds of pieces and depend on ad revenue alone
  • can include additional legal costs (have lawyers review things, etc. )
  • for things that are time sensitive, they can also mess with the work life balance of the team and the regularly scheduled content they've been working on
  • stress from dealing with mega corps with the money to ruin you as a side quest
[-] socialsecurity@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago

Is that supposed to be a abd thing?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Oh no, no more YouTube tech drama

[-] artyom@piefed.social 41 points 1 month ago

It's not YouTube drama, it's international trade drama.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

On one hand, yes. Totally. Just like the Roblox vigilante stuff and the SKG stuff, etc.

But this video and those examples are connected to larger systemic issues in the world and in the tech industry. It’s not just YouTuber beefs or relationship drama.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
637 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

75734 readers
3388 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS