26
submitted 20 hours ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/transgender

A transgender woman has been found guilty of sexually assaulting a male partner by failing to disclose her gender status to him, meaning he could not consent to the sexual activity, British prosecutors said on Friday.

Ciara Watkin, 21, performed sex acts on the man, also 21, who she had met on social media site Snapchat in June 2022, but did not disclose her transgender status to him.

The Crown Prosecution Service said Watkin had told the man that she was on her period and meaning he could not touch her below the waist.

A few days later the pair met again, after which Watkin blocked all contact with the man until she eventually got back in touch and told him during an exchange of text messages that she was transgender and had male genitalia, the CPS said.

“It is clear from the evidence in this case that, prior to engaging in sexual activity with the victim, Watkin had made no attempt to inform him of her transgender status,” said Senior Crown Prosecutor Sarah Nelson.

“The victim has made clear in police interview that he would not have engaged in sexual activity had he known that Watkin was transgender and, consequently, these events have had a significant impact on his mental wellbeing.”

Watkin, from Stockton-on-Tees in northeast England, had admitted lying but her lawyers told her trial that it would have been “blindingly obvious” to the man that she was not biologically female, the BBC said.

She was convicted of two charges of sexual assault and one charge of assault by penetration following a trial at Teesside Crown Court and will be sentenced on October 10.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zea_64 2 points 1 hour ago

He didn't disclose his credit card number despite not being asked for it, that's sexual assault.

[-] Borger 23 points 15 hours ago

As much as I think disclosure is important, they didn't have sex. This is literally just trans panic. I cannot believe she got charged with anything.

[-] cyan_mess 15 points 12 hours ago

He knew. There's no way he didn't know, given that she wasn't on hrt and hadn't had any surgeries done at the time; even though she may have been misleading. He only sued because of regret after the fact. The arguments presented by her defense are the most likely scenario. What cis men complained cis women would do to them back when metoo happened, they're doing now to trans women the first chance they've had. I hope this is a wake up call for UK trans folk to stop sexual encounters with cis folk, especially cis men.

[-] amino 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

if anything, this case proves to me why we should never disclose. it's not gonna keep you safe in court, if you survive the murder attempt

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 15 hours ago

the guy literally consented to it too

[-] neuracnu 17 points 14 hours ago

So lying to someone about yourself to get them to engage in sex acts with you... is sexual assault?

That means we're going to go after ever shady guy who claims to be rich, famous or well-connected to get laid, right? Right?

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 15 hours ago

we should sink the uk into the sea tbh

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 28 points 19 hours ago

Counter sue for sexual assault because Ciara wouldn't have slept with the asshole if she had known that he is a raging transphobic piece of shit.

[-] princessnorah 26 points 20 hours ago

The BBC article about this is one of the more transphobic things I've read from a major publication recently.

[-] oftheair 10 points 19 hours ago

From the quotes, the CNN article doesn't seem any less transphobic.

[-] princessnorah 10 points 19 hours ago

After the BBC one I just, couldn't bear reading another.

[-] oftheair 8 points 19 hours ago

Completely valid.

[-] RedSeries 21 points 20 hours ago

"Trans woman charged with biological warfare for breathing near cis male without disclosing her filthy, disgusting tranny status."

Can that whole island kill itself please? Do us all a favor?

[-] oftheair 6 points 19 hours ago

Even the trans people who live there?

[-] RedSeries 5 points 15 hours ago

Obviously not. Don't be dense, I'm venting.

[-] oftheair 4 points 13 hours ago

Don't call us dense. We genuinely couldn't tell.

[-] yoriaiko 1 points 15 hours ago

Pardon' if You find me rude, I'm noob, trying to learn stuff. Aside to things happen in UK, that have lot trans-oriented problems recently, thing could happen anywhere...

But as possible transgender myself (I'd call myself late-egg), I would find myself in 3 situations at meeting new persons:

  1. We are not into any romance/sexual stuff, just friends, any gender stuff is not related, we don't talk it at all, whatever. Still wouldn't want to befriend bi*ots, but that's another topic.

  2. We found each other on sex-finder app, we both knew we want to go into bed together and have fun. In this case now, if I keep hiding my trans-gender secret, wouldn't that be non-con to my partners? should I respect them as other humans? As much as I have rights to live my life in my way, they have same, with both side respect?

  3. Similar in romantic relations from a date-app or some other pick-up line in a cafe', if I'm about to build some relations, based on trust, how any of us could build trust with hiding such info?

Both 2 or 3 are questions related to hiding if asked moments, aside to other person respecting me being "uncommon" or not. Other one could even very politely and friendly refuse going deeper in relation knowing my secret, and imHo that would be ok too.

Personally, I would feel bad if I had to cheat that on partner, either sex or life partner.

How do You deal with that?

[-] RedSeries 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You deal with it by asking what the harm truly is and why the onus is only on trans people to placate cis people

  • Transgender people deserve to be able to have sex/do sex acts with consenting adults without having to wear a gigantic "I'm trans" sign that can subject them to harassment or assault. It's not some secret meant to nefariously get in cis folks pants. This also applies to dating and I have words about that, so I'll stop there.
  • If genitals matter that much, politely decline or ask what genitals the person has. Just because someone is trans doesn't suddenly change that they are the gender they say they are.
    • As an aside, I feel like that cis man is just so weirded out by dick that he's a breath away from chopping his own off when he sees it in the mirror.
  • If the genitals aren't shown and aren't used, why does it fucking matter? This is part of the same reasons bigots use to try and force trans people out of gendered spaces.
  • If someone failed to disclose some other feature of themselves that this cis male disliked, is that ok?
    • What if a cis woman had breast implants and didn't disclose that?
    • What if a cis man had a vasectomy and didn't disclose it?
    • What if a cis person wore a wig or makeup to appear more attractive? That sure seems deceptive.
    • Would cis folks get charged with a sex crime for any physical features they have that go undisclosed, even if they went unused or were irrelevant to the act?
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

Transgender

924 readers
85 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS