471
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stern@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

government owning the means of production?

🤔

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 1 day ago

Not socialism.

There's a different word for that, unless you think the American government represents the working class.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 20 points 1 day ago

Everyone calling this socialism is a moron

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Socialism is workers owning the means of production. Not the government. The government can be fucking anything and it (or the people controlling it) profiting from owning a company isn't socialism by itself.

It's fine and all to talk about a worker's government but is that what you would call a Trump presidency? The American government at any point in its history? Will literally ONE FUCKING DOLLAR of Intel profit go to a worker from this?

They're cutting social services and expanding the power of the surveillance state. Just think for one goddamn second about function instead of form, I'm begging you people.

[-] pneumaticFax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Could call it national socialism.

[-] kalkulat@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wow. Throw 16M people off health care, then invest the 'savings' in corporations. HEy, Intel, how do you like your blood money?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 32 points 2 days ago

Historical evidence would seem to suggest that Intel very much do like their blood money I would imagine they would like some more please.

[-] SpontaneousCombustion@lemmy.world 238 points 2 days ago

Funny, when Europe does this, it’s called “socialism”.

[-] assembly@lemmy.world 133 points 2 days ago

Can you imagine the screams of, “COMMUNISM!!!!” If Obama or Biden had done this. It’s all we would hear about for an entire election cycle. Fox “News” would play it nonstop.

[-] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 days ago

Didn't Obama do it for GM and a bunch of other companies as part of a bailout package for a period of time?

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 49 points 2 days ago

So did Bush. It's only bad when their enemies do it. It's righteous and just when they do it.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

So if I'm reading that right they set for $700 billion worth of purchase during the Bush admin, it got reduced to 426.4 billion by 2014 and they claimed they made $15.3 billion. It sounds like they made a 3.5% gain on their investment total. A win! Yay... Only if you ignore the fact that if that money went in from 2009-2024, the money averages out on inflation to have been worth 481.29 billion. A loss of $12.15 billion dollars if they would have done anything else with it.

Overall I wouldn't be mad that they wasted that money if they had focused on structuring the company moving forward in a manner that wouldn't end up supporting a wealth divide moving forward. The CEO "only" had a salary of $2.1 million in 2024. Which actually sounds mildly alright. Yet her take home was $29.5 million when they got done throwing stocks and bonuses at her. That's after GM stock started 2024 at $55.50.... and ended the year at $35.64.

So the company lost ~36% of its "worth" and she got more than 13x her salary in stock and bonuses.

[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I was wondering recently if the idea of opportunity cost is the same for governments that can print their own money versus all other entities. I'm not entirely clear on how the that automaker bailouts were financed but would that money even have existed if they hadn't used it for the bailout? It's not like the government was going to create that amount of money and put it in a savings account.

A more appropriate way to look at it might be whether the money earned more than it cost the government to service the debt. IIRC servicing government debt is not inflation-adjusted, so it's probably more informative to compare it to the cost of the debt not inflation adjusted-growth.

But this gets pretty weird since it's not how finance works for entities that cannot print their own money.

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 days ago

Ah but a bailout package is different. That's a display of powerful capitalism. A private company so powerful it can't be allowed to fail and a government so strong it won't allow it to fail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 51 points 2 days ago

Yes, but it's not socialism we're seeing. It's fascism. Fascism also has state control of private industry. For a different purpose.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

And when China and Arab states do it, it's something to aspire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 138 points 2 days ago

Seems like the government owning private industry might stray into the socialism thing thy hate. Why not do this with something more important like healthcare? Republicans are hypocrites.

[-] blattrules@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago

It’s only socialism when democrats do it.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

We’ve always had communism for the rich and cutthroat capitalism for the working class

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Our healthcare system in the US is Socialism, only the government funds the corporations with subsidies, not paying outright for the citizens. It's a man in the middle system where they stick a middle finger up your ass to get money from you three times. With taxes, with insurance, and with actual medical care.

[-] seralth@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Healthcare could help, that's good socialism. Intel is profits and power and control for the sake of it. That's bad socialism.

That way when things fuck up they can point and go SEE SEE IT DOESNT WORK! WE TRIED IT AND IT MADE THINGS WORSE!!

and if it somehow does manage to help or improve things they can now claim they did something smart and take all the credit.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

Well, no. In this case it's probably Intel is collapsing I assume, and they're the only CPU producer native to the US. It'd be a really bad thing strategically to let them fail, so they should be nationalized.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UpperBroccoli 16 points 1 day ago

Boycot Intel? Okay, you got it!

[-] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Already buying AMD. Nothing personal, AMD CPUs are just better, faster, more efficient and easier to upgrade.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

isnt intel kinda dying with the latest fiasco with thier chips.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 91 points 2 days ago

Uhhh, so much for the free market Republicans spent decades championing

[-] ronigami@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

They’ll run it into the ground regardless.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Well, yeah, they always do. Republican admins always leave the economy in the shitter and saddle the nation up with debt so that the incoming Democratic admin has to spend all of their time bringing the economy back up to speed rather than implementing effective reform.

[-] ronigami@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They aren’t interested in effective reform either. Biden had chances to tax billionaires, or to imprison Trump. But yes they are better at handling the economy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

The market would be freer if it wasn’t dominated by a couple capitalist megacorpos. So nationalisation doesn’t mean less freedom, although neolib propaganda would love you to think so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes but contrary to China, USA doesn't use government subsidies to promote their own industries, or state owned companies to spy on the rest of the world. 🤪
/S

I hope Intel survives because a Chinese (mainland+Taiwan) monopoly will not be good, but I am so sick of American disinformation regarding China. Always blaming China for things USA has been guilty of for decades before China.

[-] XenGi@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

Are you sure about that? US hardware is spying on the rest of the world for decades. Cisco is in no way better then huawei.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can you not see the crazy smiley? Clearly indicating the statement is crazy. It was sarcasm, but OK I'll add the /S.

Also the part that USA did it for decades before China should clearly indicate the part above was sarcasm???

[-] absentbird@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Reading comprehension is a skill. It seems like some people just glance at the words and make up what they expect to see. I have no idea how your comment could have been interpreted the way they did without a total disregard for the substance. Maybe they were reading it through an auto translation? Still, seems like the emoji is pretty obvious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Well, now that they're doing it like China is, the rest of the world should use tariffs to mitigate this, like we do with Chinese EVs for an example (since those are so heavily subsidized to root out competition not just in China, but worldwide)

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

Fascism is a far-right, ultranationalist, and authoritarian political ideology that emerged in early 20th-century Europe, characterized by a totalitarian, one-party state, a charismatic leader, a fixation on national decline, and the suppression of individual rights and opposition groups. It combines elements of militarism, economic self-sufficiency, and mass mobilization, often through propaganda and violence, to achieve a vision of national purity and power.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is why I don't like trump being called a nazi, a nazi was a nickname for the german fascist based on the name of the political party NSDAP, specifically the N part, National with the ti part being pronounced the same as the zi part in nazi.

Trump is an american fascist. When you call him a nazi it paints the picture of the ultra villified almost over the top hollywood nazi and it muddies the water and lets other fascist media pundits dismiss it over exaggeration.

Now after being pedantic I prefer these lists tlto check if you live in a fascist state

https://www.keene.edu/academics/cchgs/resources/presentation-materials/characteristics-and-appeal-of-fascism/download/

https://osbcontent.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/PC-00466.pdf

Spoiler alert: the US is under control of a fascist government.

[-] natecox@programming.dev 42 points 2 days ago

And so the current Intel chipset I have will be the last I ever own.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 27 points 2 days ago

I feel like that should’ve already been a given when the 13th and 14th gen Core processors permanently kneecap themselves if they feel like it. But that’s just me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago

So uh, Intel doesn’t get anything, and gives up 10% of their stock because they’ve just decided to retroactively alter the CHIPs act?

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Better for intel than not receiving $8B at all. It can avoid spending it on Ohio plant without upsetting politicians if no one wants to use Ohio made chips. But its not as though telecom companies ever faced real consequences for pocketing "rural broadband subsidies".

The best part about this, is political campaigns surrounded on confiscatory nationalization of climate terrorists and zionazi first political party influence is normalized.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[-] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

small penis government 😤

[-] vane@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

OpenAI next. You don't want AI but you will pay for it in taxes.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

My government, picking winners and losers?

[-] SnotFlickerman 22 points 2 days ago

AyyyyyyyyMD

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
471 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

74381 readers
2504 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS