[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

True, but getting some details wrong seems to fit with the theme of the meme.

[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I like the iNaturalist app: https://www.inaturalist.org/. When I see something I'm interested in whether plant or animal, I upload a picture and it tells me what it thinks it is. And they're trying to collect good data about flora and fauna so there are volunteers who review submissions and agree or correct it, so it's not just an algorithm doing the work. Obviously when you upload it it's a computer making a guess but people usually review the uploads later, and you can get emails with the results of those reviews.

Someone else mentioned Merlin for birds, which is cool because it can do image ID or bird call ID.

[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dude, Where's My Car? is so much better than it had any right to be. And while the main characters are stoners, most of the humor isn't stoner humor. Not that there's anything wrong with stoner humor, but movies that consist entirely of stoner humor tend to drag after a while.

295
Saab rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by Tehhund@lemmy.world to c/onehundredninetysix
[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 74 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm on both Mastodon and Bluesky. To me, Mastodon's biggest problem is its refusal to have an algorithm to surface popular content. Yes there are problems with algorithms, but I don't have the time or inclination to read every post in chronological order. A good algorithm would show me popular posts without manipulating me for profit.

Edt: a few people have misunderstood me. I'm not proposing "Mastodon shows me stuff from people I don't follow," I'm suggesting "Mastodon shows me stuff only from people I follow, but it shows me the popular stuff first."

[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago

Theoretically, Biden could do it and not be prosecuted.

But if he ordered a member of the military to do it, they are required to refuse illegal orders. I don't know the rules about illegal orders but I bet this would fall under that. At the same time, the President can pardon people convicted in military court so that's not much of a deterrent.

Similarly if he ordered a civilian (say, CIA) to assassinate Trump, that person could be tried. But again, the President's pardon power makes federal charges not much of a threat.

BUT — the President cannot grant pardons for convictions in state courts. So anyone involved would be in trouble if it happened in a US state. And if the Supreme Court did not make the President immune from state-level prosecution, Biden could be tried for being involved... but it seems unlikely that they would go for "the President is immune from federal prosecution but not state prosecution."

Of course, all this show how insane and dangerous the idea of Presidential immunity is. It's a terrible idea.

[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Instant ramen. Or if I'm feeling fancy, ramen that takes 6 whole minutes to cook

[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago

I read that as "the tool to report websites is broken."

24
[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

Sure, but what real-world problem does a trustless solve? I thought this was all very interesting years ago but now that we've had blockchain for years it seems it's only good for illegal or morally questionable transactions.

[-] Tehhund@lemmy.world 88 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The approved mRNA vaccines went through the same approval process as any vaccine. And once approved, they are monitored for safety like any other vaccine. Between pre-approval testing and post-approval monitoring, we would have detected any issues. So the proof is in the pudding — lots of countries have approved them and none have found risks that are worse than the disease they protect against (currently only COVID but there are more mRNA vaccines in the works).

There's also no reason to fear the way they work. Other vaccines introduce antigens (molecules that your body doesn't like and produces antibodies to attack) in various ways — sometimes with a weakend virus, sometimes with a dead virus, sometimes just the antigens themselves. mRNA is just another way to introduce antigens so your body learns to fight them. For a little while your body follows the instructions in the mRNA to produce the antigens, and then your body learns to attack those antigens. It's not all that different from the way other vaccines work. mRNA breaks down pretty quickly in your body so it's not even in your system for very long, and there's no mechanism in the body for mRNA to produce lasting changes. So it's a lot like you got a cold: for a little while the cold makes your body produce molecules, then your body fights it all off, and then in the end there's no permanent change except your body learned to fight off that particular antigen.

147
submitted 2 years ago by Tehhund@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Does ActivityPub send those to other instances, or does ActivityPub only send the original post and the rest (upvotes, downvotes, replies) are stored only on the original server where the post was made?

1
submitted 2 years ago by Tehhund@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I'm trying to comment on this but I'm not sure how to pull it up on lemmy.world and then comment on it: https://startrek.website/comment/38082

view more: next ›

Tehhund

joined 2 years ago