241
Meet The Bluesky (media.piefed.ca)
submitted 3 days ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 44 points 3 days ago

Bluesky speedrunning enshittification.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 days ago

It's actually easy to dodge their enshittification with atproto.

If you get banned on mastodon, you can't move your followers to another server, but on bluesky you can get your rotation key and move them permissionlessly.

Alternate appviews can dodge shit decisions (like the OSA id thing), without you needing to make a new account or move servers.

[-] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 13 points 3 days ago

Are there any other instances of BS though? My understanding was that it's too costly to host so there's only the official one

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago

It's gotten cheaper.

deer.social is an alt-client. app.wafrn.net is an alt-pds and appview.

[-] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Oh sweet that's great to hear!

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago

If you get banned on mastodon, you can’t move your followers to another server

This actually depends. Mastodon has several ways of 'banning' a users, and apparently 'frozen' users can migrate their followers.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Sure, but admins still have the power to make it impossible for you to migrate, whereas bluesky does not.

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

I mean those followers wouldn't mean much if Bluesky stopped indexing your profile though, unless they also jumped to an alternative relay.

I don't want to labour this point too much, I generally agree with you that Bluesky handles this better and it's the direction fedi should be heading.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

That's a fault of everyone using bluesky's infrastucture, the same could happen on the fediverse.
That's the biggest problem rn imo.

[-] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

I mean the name alone was a nail in the coffin. Bluesky for blue MAGA.

[-] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

I don't know that the name had anything to do with it, but it definitely is a BlueMAGA watering hole with all the vibes of a portapotty after a 3-day festival in high summer.

[-] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

It was just a joke considering both have blue in their name.

Bluesky became the liberal part of twitter. I mean quite literally most users come from there. It was doomed from the start with that.

[-] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 27 points 3 days ago
[-] maam@feddit.uk 24 points 3 days ago

Someone got banned for saying rude things towards JKR.

[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 days ago

Seriously, you Americans and your countless frigging 3 letter abbreviations for more or less significant people. JKR, AOC, MTG, WTF! Just write those names, you'll soon run out of acronymns.

[-] scratchee@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago
[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago
[-] moakley@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago
[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 days ago

And what about the person writing the abbreviation?

[-] SCmSTR 10 points 3 days ago

That bitch has a rotten fish turd for a heart.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They've got fuckin JKR Rowling on there?? What absolute trash.

[-] candy_colors@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

Can someone please explain?

[-] klu9@piefed.social 40 points 3 days ago
[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 19 points 3 days ago

Interesting that he's so optimistic about bluesky vs mastodon

[-] klu9@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago

I think he has written about some of the better technical aspects of ATproto vs ActivityPub, but the one thing holding it back was how hard/expensive it was to host. Now apparently that final hurdle has been resolved.

(NOTE: I am not an expert, just trying to recall from a little reading elsewhere)

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 16 points 3 days ago

Now apparently that final hurdle has been resolved.

He says so in this article, but afaik you won't get a full bluesky node, just parts of it. So it's not fully decentralized. But you're not under their TOS apparently.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Actually, you can host a full-network relay for $34 a month: https://whtwnd.com/bnewbold.net/3kwzl7tye6u2y (article by a bluesky engineer).

All the other pieces are self hostable, PDSes are trival to host, and would cost less than $5 a month.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago

All the other pieces are self hostable, PDSes are trival to host, and would cost less than $5 a month.

No I think they still have control over the decentralized identifiers, ironically

https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

Also: a lot of stuff from that article isn't really accurate anymore.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

yeah, honestly I wish them luck

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

You can use a web did.

But yeah, did:plc is a joke.

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The good news here is that Bluesky has made enormous progress in true federation. The cost of operating a full Bluesky stack has fallen from tens of millions of dollars per year to tens of dollars per month

Great!

But Bluesky, the company, still needs serious work.

As things stand, Bluesky has very bad terms of service that every user who creates an account has to subject themselves to. In particular, Bluesky's ToS contain a "binding arbitration" waiver that forces users to surrender the right to sue Bluesky no matter how the company harms them. This is so pro-enshittificatory, it's like a landing strip for the sole use of Enshittification Airlines, which can land a 747 full of enshittfying nonsense on Bluesky's users every 10 minutes, around the clock, without worrying about any legal repercussions.

This is less great.

Edit: Wait, what?

The new waiver says that you don't have to arbitrate for "claims that fraud, criminal misconduct, or gross negligence by Bluesky caused death or personal injury." That sounds good! It also sounds like everything that someone might sue Bluesky for, leaving me to wonder what Bluesky will make you arbitrate for.

What's more, if the point of a binding arbitration waiver is to reduce nuisance suits and threats, this completely nullifies that tactic, because all a nuisance litigant has to do is claim that they are suing because of "fraud, criminal misconduct, or gross negligence," and Bluesky is back in court.

I'm more confused now.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Definitely important to look at, but also pretty industry standard. These texts are legal protections so they cover literally everything, even if a lot of those wouldn't hold in court.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago
[-] candy_colors@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

So I'm guessing their going to allow more cuckservatives on there huh? It's funny how truth social was never considered too right wing

We need to make mastodon/pixedfed and lemmy easier to understand for the masses

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago

Thanks, I have not kept up with the lore.

Been on mastodon (actually gotosocial but same thing) for a bit now.

I knew at some point blue would get enshitified. Didn't think it would happen so soon though.

[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I said months ago, on Bluesky no less, that it would eventually travel down the same route Twitter did. Said enjoy it while it lasts but eventually it's inevitable that bluesky will just be twitter from years ago. And they're traveling that route in record time.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 17 points 3 days ago

Bluesky? More like Blu Spy

*laugh track*

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

funky slap bass

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Your meme templates get more exotic as time goes on.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
241 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse memes

1789 readers
89 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
Specific

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS