I remember how we would get into trouble for copying each other's homework in high school.
Now we get in trouble for generating each other's homework 🤷
OK Tech bros, repeat after me:
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind."
I wonder if a good fine tuned model beats every general purpose LLM if you need it for a really specific purpose
Yes it does
Of course, and this is why the new hotness is a Mixture of Experts for one model that is effectively a bunch of experts arguing over the answer, or else on a different scale there's the Combination of Agents where different specialized agents perform specialized tasks.
There is new project which they share fine-tuned modernbert on some task. Here is the org https://huggingface.co/adaptive-classifier
I thought DeepSeek's selling point was efficiency?
It was beating near frontier models at tenth of a cost could be hosted by you or any cloud service for you and the open weights were not censored for China's pr and could be jailbroken to say write code for shady stuff which any frontier model would refuse.
(None of them are THAT much better than previous, even worse in some areas)
Wait a second.
Grok's symbol is a lightning bolt?
Grok 2 will have two lightning bolts
how about you grok deez nuts (it is 1 am please forgive me)
Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.
Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.
As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.
Rules:
Rule 1 - No harassment or personal character attacks of community members. I.E no namecalling, no generalizing entire groups of people that make up our community, no baseless personal insults.
Rule 2 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning models to cryptocurrency. I.E no comparing the usefulness of models to that of NFTs, no comparing the resource usage required to train a model is anything close to maintaining a blockchain/ mining for crypto, no implying its just a fad/bubble that will leave people with nothing of value when it burst.
Rule 3 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning to simple text prediction algorithms. I.E statements such as "llms are basically just simple text predictions like what your phone keyboard autocorrect uses, and they're still using the same algorithms since <over 10 years ago>.
Rule 4 - No implying that models are devoid of purpose or potential for enriching peoples lives.
